This article provides a comparative glimpse of work/family issues in Australia and the USA. It begins with a summary of an emerging vision of ideal policies and practices for work and family. The article then provides historical background for the recent emergence of a ‘care gap’ in both countries, focusing on key commonalities and differences. The current status of the gap and the related ‘default solution’ to the gap are then outlined. Key commonalities here include an increasing diversity of family forms, a rise in delayed and denied childbearing, and substantial gender inequality. Significant current divergence across the societies includes relatively more family-responsive governmental policies in Australia, more attractive part-time opportunities for mothers in Australia, a relatively more equal division of labor in the home in the USA, a greater prevalence of corporate-sponsored work/family policies in the USA, and greater coverage of Australian employees by work/family policies negotiated through enterprise agreements. A tentative research agenda is provided in conclusion, focusing on part-time employment options, work incentives and childcare for single parents, the causes of delayed and denied childbearing, and enterprise bargaining and corporate policies.
Albelda, R. P. and Tilly, C. (1997) Glass Ceilings and Bottomless Pits: Women’s Work, Women’s Poverty. Boston, MA: South End Press .
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2000) ‘Labour Force Status and Other Characteristics of Families, Australia’ (June), Catalogue No. 6224.0. Canberra: ABS .
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001a) ‘Labour Force, Australia, Preliminary’ (May), Catalogue No. 6202.0. Canberra: ABS .
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001b) ‘Special Article: Full-time and Part-time Employment’, in ‘Labour Force, Australia’ (October), Catalogue No. 6203.0. Canberra: ABS .
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2003) ‘Employee Earnings, Benefits and Trade Union Membership, Australia’ (August), Catalogue No. 6310.0.
6.
Bailyn, L. (1993) Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World. New York: Free Press .
7.
Baird, M. (2003) ‘Paid Maternity Leave: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly’ , Australian Bulletin of Labour29(1): 97-109 .
8.
Bardoel, E. A. , Tharenou, P. and Ristov, D. (2000) ‘The Changing Composition of the Australian Workforce Relevant to Work-Family Issues’ , International Human Resource Issues1(1): 58-77 .
9.
Bardoel, E. A. , Tharenou, P. and Moss, S. (2001) ‘Work-Family Practices and Accommodating Work-Family Workplaces: A Combined Institutional and Resource Dependent Theory Explanation’, Working Paper 31/01, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Melbourne .
10.
Barnes, A. (2001) ‘Low Fertility: A Discussion Paper’, Occasional Paper No. 2, Department of Family and Community Services, Canberra .
11.
Barnett, R. and Rivers, C. (1998) He Works/She Works: How Two Income Families are Happy, Healthy, and Thriving. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
12.
Benet, S. (2001) ‘Parents May Pay Ultimate Price for Low-Cost Care’ , Women’s E News (21 June), accessed 1 July 2001, http://www.womensenews.org
13.
Bittman, M. (1999) ‘Parenthood Without Penalty: Time Use and Public Policy in Australia and Finland’ , Feminist Economics5(3): 27-42 .
14.
Bond, J. T. , Galinsky, E. and Swanberg, J. (1998) The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute .
15.
Budig, M. J. and England, P. (2001) ‘The Wage Penalty for Motherhood’ , American Sociological Review66(2): 204-225 .
16.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2000) Union Members in 2000, USDL 01-21, US Department of Labor, accessed 5 October 2006, http://www.bls.gov/schedule/archives/all_nr.htm%23UNION2
17.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003) Union Members in 2003, USDL 04-53, US Department of Labor, accessed 5 October 2006, http://www.bls.gov/schedule/archives/all_nr.htm%23UNION2
18.
Burkett, E. (2000) The Baby Boon: How Family-Friendly America Cheats the Childless. New York: Free Press .
19.
Bushey, H. and Gunderson, B. (2001) ‘Hardships Suffered by Welfare Families’ (27 June). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute , http://www.epinet.org
20.
Chapman, B. , Dunlop, Y. , Gray, M. , Liu, A. and Mitchell, D. (2001) ‘The Impact of Children on the Lifetime Earnings of Australian Women: Evidence from the 1990s’, Working Paper, Australian National University .
21.
Crittenden, A. (2001) The Price of Motherhood. New York: Metropolitan Books .
22.
Davis, E. and Lansbury, R. (2000) ‘Employment Relations in Australia’, in G. Bamber and R. Lansbury (eds) International and Comparative Employment Relations, pp. 110-143. London: Sage .
23.
Department of Employment , Workplace Relations and Small Business (1999) Work and Family: State of Play 1998. Canberra: DEWRSB .
24.
Deutsch, F. (1999) Halving It All: How Equally Shared Parenting Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
25.
Dowd, N. (2000) Redefining Fatherhood. New York: New York University Press .
26.
Drago, R. (2000) ‘Trends in Working Time in the U.S.: A Policy Perspective’ , Labor Law Journal51(Winter): 212-218 .
27.
Drago, R. , Costanza, D. , Caplan, R. , Brubaker, T. , Cloud, D. , Harris, N. , Kashian, R. and Riggs, T. L. (2001) ‘The Willingness-to-Pay for Work/Family Policies: A Study of Teachers’ , Industrial and Labor Relations Review55: 22-41 .
28.
Duncan, A. and Harris, M. (2001) ‘Simulating the Behavioural Effects of Welfare Reforms among Sole Parents in Australia’ (June), Working Paper No. 6/01, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research .
29.
Folbre, N. (2001) The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: New Press .
30.
Fried, M. (1998) Taking Time: Parental Leave Policy and Corporate Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
31.
Fukuyama, F. (1999) The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. New York: Free Press .
32.
Garey, A. I. (1999) Weaving Work and Motherhood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
33.
Gerstel, N. and Clawson, D. (2000) ‘Unions Responses to Family Concerns’, Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts/Amherst .
34.
Glass, J. (2000) ‘Envisioning the Integration of Family and Work: Toward a Kinder, Gentler Workplace’ , Contemporary Sociology29(1): 129-143 .
35.
Glezer, H. and Wolcott, I. (2000) ‘Conflicting Commitments: Working Mothers and Fathers in Australia’, in L. L. Haas , P. Hwang and G. Russell (eds) Organizational Change and Gender Equity, pp. 43-56. London: Sage .
36.
Harrington, M. (1999) Care and Equality: Inventing a New Family Politics. New York: Knopf .
37.
Heymann, J. (2000) The Widening Gap: Why America’s Working Families Are in Jeopardy - and What Can Be Done About It. New York: Free Press .
38.
Hochschild, A. (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home & Home Becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books .
39.
Hochschild, A. with Machung, A. (1989) The Second Shift. New York: Avon .
40.
Joint Governments’ Submission (2000) ‘Safety Net Review - Wages: 1999-2000’. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business .
41.
Kalb, G. (1999) ‘Labour Supply and Welfare Participation in Australian Two-Adult Households: Comparing 1986/87 with 1994/95,’ Working Paper no. BP-34, Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University , December.
42.
Kalb, G. (2000) ‘Labour Supply and Welfare Participation in Australian Two-Adult Households: Accounting for Involuntary Unemployment and the “Cost” of Part-time Work’, Preliminary Working Paper No. BP-35, Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University , October.
43.
Lakoff, G. (1996) Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals Don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
44.
McClure, P. (2000) ‘Participation Support for a More Equitable Society’, Final Report of the Reference Group on Welfare Reform. Canberra: Department of Family and Community Services .
45.
McDonald, P. (2000) ‘Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility’ , Journal of Population Research17(1): 1-16 .
46.
Maushart, S. (2001) Wifework: What Marriage Really Means for Women. Melbourne: Text Publishing .
47.
Moen, P. and Yu, Y. (2000) ‘Effective Work/Life Strategies’ , Social Problems47(August): 291-326 .
48.
Moss-Kanter, R. (1977) Work and the Family in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
49.
Pocock, B. (2003) The Work/Life Collision. Leichardt: Federation Press .
50.
Risman, B. (1998) Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
51.
Russell, G. and Bowman, L. (2000) ‘Work and Family: Current Thinking, Research and Practice’. Canberra: Department of Family and Community Services .
52.
Sandberg, J. and Hofferth, S. (2001) ‘Changes in Children’s Time with Parents, U.S., 1981-1997’ (May), PSC Research Report No. 01-475, University of Michigan , accessed 5 October 2006, http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/pubs/papers/rr01-475.pdf
53.
Schor, J. B. (1998) The Overspent American: Upscaling, Downshifting, and the New Consumer. New York: Basic Books .
54.
Stone, D. (2000) ‘Why We Need a Care Movement’ , The Nation (13 March) 270(10): 13-15 .
55.
UMR Research Party (2001) ‘Australia-wide Study of Workplace Issues’ (February), Report for the Australian Council of Trade Unions .
56.
US Department of Labor (1999) ‘Report on the American Workforce’, accessed 5 October 2006, http://www.bls.gov/opub/rtaw/pdf/rtaw1999.pdf
57.
Varner, A. and Drago, R. (2001) ‘Fertility and Work in the United States: A Policy Perspective’, Report for the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Japan .
58.
Whyte, W. H., Jr (1956) The Organization Man. New York: Simon & Schuster .
59.
Williams, J. (1999) Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press .
60.
Willis, J. S. (1997) ‘Women and Part-time Employment: The Waverley Survey’, General Paper No. G122, Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University , December.
61.
Wooden, M. (2001a) ‘Are Non-standard Jobs Sub-standard Jobs?’ , Australian Social Monitor3(3): 65-70 .
62.
Wooden, M. (2001b) ‘Industrial Relations Reform in Australia: Causes, Consequences and Prospects’ , Australian Economic Review34(3): 243-262 .
