The extant literature on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities (LD) has indicated that whereas a majority belong to peer groups, a higher proportion are isolated and most have lower social status among peers in general than their typically achieving classmates. Although some work has examined these issues over short-term longitudinal studies, none to date have examined them over extensive time periods. Toward this end, the current study examined a sample of 1,361 students (678 girls and 683 boys; 55 with LD) using multiple measures of peer social functioning assessed each semester from spring of third grade through fall of sixth grade. The results indicated that whereas students with LD were similar to their typically achieving peers in terms of group functioning and characteristics, they were viewed as lower in social standing among their classmates as a whole. These effects were maintained over time, indicating that long-term inclusion may not substantially affect peer social functioning among students with LD.
Al-Yagon, M., & Mikulincer, M. (2004). Patterns of close relationships and socioemotional and academic adjustment among school-age children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19, 12−19.
2.
Austin, A.B., & Draper, D.C. (1984). The relationship among peer acceptance, social impact, and academic achievement in middle school. American Education Research Journal, 21, 597−604.
3.
Berndt, T.J., & Keefe, K. (1995). Friends' influence on adolescents' adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312−1329.
4.
Berndt, T.J., Laychak, A.E., & Park, K. (1990). Friends' influence on adolescents' academic achievement motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 664−670.
5.
Berndt, T.J., Perry, T.B., & Miller, K.E. (1988). Friends' and classmates' interaction on academic tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 506−513.
6.
Brendgen, M., Wanner, B., Morin, A.J.S., & Vitaro, F. (2005). Relations with parents and with peers, temperament, and trajectories of depressed mood during early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 579−594.
7.
Bryk, A.S., Raudenbush, S.W., & Congdon, R.T., Jr. (1996). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L program. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
8.
Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Cairns, R.B., Cairns, B.D., Neckerman, H.J., Gest, S.J. & Gariépy, J.-L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection?Developmental Psychology , 24, 815−823.
10.
Cairns, R.B., Leung, M.-C., Buchanan, L., & Cairns, B.D. (1995). Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: Fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. Child Development, 66, 1330−1345.
11.
Cairns, R.B., Perrin, J.E., & Cairns, B.D. (1985). Social structure and social cognition in early adolescence: Affiliative patterns. Journal of Early Adolescence , 5, 339−355.
12.
Carlson, C.I. (1987). Social interaction goals and strategies of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 20, 306−311.
13.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102−105.
14.
Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 29, 261−282.
15.
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Kupersmidt, J.B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17−59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CTBM/McGraw-Hill. (1999). Teacher's guide to Terra Nova: CTBS battery, survey, and plus editions, multiple assessments. Monterey, CA: Author .
17.
DeRosier, M.E., Kupersmidt, J.B., & Patterson, C.J. (1994). Children's academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development, 65, 1799−1813.
18.
Edwards, C.A. (1990). Leadership, social networks, and personal attributes in school age girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina.
19.
Elias, M.J. (2004). The connection between social—emotional learning and learning disabilities: Implications for intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 53−63.
20.
Estell, D.B., Farmer, T.W., Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. (2002). Social relations and academic achievement in inner-city early elementary classrooms. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 518−528.
21.
Estell, D.B., Farmer, T.W., Pearl, R., Van Acker, R., & Rodkin, P.C. (2003). Heterogeneity in the relationship between popularity and aggression: Individual, group, and classroom influences. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), S. C. Peck, & R. W. Roeser (Vol. Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Vol. 101. Person-centered approaches to studying human development in context (pp. 75−85). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Farmer, T.W. (2000). The social dynamics of aggressive and disruptive behavior in school: Implications for behavioral consultation. Journal of Education and Behavioral Consultation,21, 194−208.
23.
Farmer, T.W., & Farmer, E.M.Z. (1996). Social relationships of students with exceptionalities in mainstream classrooms: Social networks and homophily. Exceptional Children, 62, 431−450.
24.
Fleming, V.M., & Alexander, J.M. (2001). The benefits of peer collaboration: A replication with a delayed posttest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 588−601.
25.
Frederickson, N.L., & Furnham, A.F. (2004). Peer-assessed behavioral characteristics and sociometric rejection: Differences between pupils who have moderate learning difficulties and their mainstream peers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 391−410.
26.
Gest, S.D., Farmer, T.W., Cairns, B.D., & Xie, H. (2003). Identifying children's peer social networks in school classrooms: Links between peer reports and observed interactions. Social Development, 12, 513−529.
27.
Gest, S.D., Graham-Bermann, S.A., & Hartup, W.W. (2001). Peer experience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23−40.
28.
Gottlieb, B.W., Gottlieb, J., Berkell, D., & Levy, L. (1986). Sociometric status and solitary play of LD boys and girls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 619−622.
29.
Gresham, F.M., Evans, S., & Elliott, S.N. (1988). Self-efficacy differences among mildly handicapped, gifted, and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Special Education , 22, 231−241.
30.
Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (1997 ). Stanford Achievement Test series, ninth edition: Spring multilevel norms book. San Antonio, TX: Author .
31.
Hoover, H.D., Hieronymus, A.N., Frisbie, D.A., & Dunbar, S.B. (1993). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Forms K and L. Chicago: Riverside.
32.
Hymel, S., Comfort, C., Schonert-Reichl, K., & McDougall, P. (1996). Academic failure and school dropout: The influence of peers. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment (pp. 313−345). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1996). Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 226−237.
34.
Kavale, K.A., & Mostert, M.P. (2004). Social skills interventions for individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 31−43.
35.
Kuhne, M., & Wiener, J. (2000). Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly , 23, 64−75.
36.
Ladd, G.W. (2005). Children's peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Manion, V., & Alexander, J.M. (1999). The benefits of peer collaboration on strategy use, metacognitive causal attribution, and recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychiatry, 67, 268−289.
38.
Meadan, H., & Halle, J.W. (2004). Social perceptions of students with learning disabilities who differ in social status. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19, 71−82.
39.
Parker, J.G., & Asher, S.R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?Psychological Bulletin,102, 357−389.
40.
Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct measures of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence , 18, 125−144.
41.
Pearl, R., Farmer, T.W., Van Acker, R., Rodkin, P., Bost, K.K., Coe, M., et al. (1998). The social integration of students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms: Peer group membership and peer-assessed social behavior. Elementary School Journal, 99, 167−185.
42.
Plata, M., Trusty, J., & Glasgow, D. (2005). Adolescents with learning disabilities: Are they allowed to participate in activities?Journal of Educational Research, 98, 136−143.
43.
Prinstein, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310−342.
44.
Rodkin, P.C., Farmer, T.W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14−24.
45.
Rydell Altermatt, E., & Pomerantz, E.M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 111−123.
46.
Salend, S.J., & Duhaney, L.M.G. (1999). The impact of inclusion on students with and without learning disabilities and their educators. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 114−126.
47.
Tur-Kaspa, H., Margalit, M., & Most, T. (1999). Reciprocal friendship, reciprocal rejection and socio-emotional adjustment: The social experiences of children with learning disorders over a one-year period. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14, 37−48.
48.
Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B., & Boardman, A.G. (2001). The social functioning of students with learning disabilities: Implications for inclusion. Exceptionality,9, 47−65.
49.
Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B.E., & Schumm, J.S. (1996). The effects of inclusion on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 598−608.
50.
Vaughn, S., Hogan, A., Kouzekanani, K., & Shapiro, S. (1990). Peer acceptance, self-perceptions, and social skills of learning disabled students prior to identification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 101−106.
51.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Revised (WISC-R). Madrid: TEA Ed.
52.
Wentzel, K.R. (2003). Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 5−28.
53.
Wiener, J. (2004). Do peer relationships foster behavioral adjustment in children with learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 21−30.
54.
Wiener, J., & Tardif, C.Y. (2004). Social and emotional functioning of children with learning disabilities: Does special education placement make a difference?Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19, 20−32.
55.
Xie, H., Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. (1999). Social networks and configurations in inner-city schools: Aggression, popularity, and implications for students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 147−155.
