Some previous research has shown strong associations between spelling ability and rapid automatic naming (RAN) after controls for phonological processing and nonsense-word reading ability, consistent with the double-deficit hypothesis in reading and spelling. Previous studies did not, however, control for nonsense-word spelling ability before assessing RAN—spelling associations. In this study, 65 children with poor spelling skills but average reasoning ability completed RAN tasks and spelling, reading, and reasoning tasks. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that, after controls for chronological age, reasoning ability, and spelling of nonsense words, alphanumeric RAN, but not nonalphanumeric RAN, was still a strong predictor of spelling acquisition. Findings are discussed in terms of single- and double-deficit models of spelling and implications for effective teaching.
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Bowers, P.G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Predictors of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133-153.
3.
Bowers, P.G., Sunseth, K., & Golden, J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress . Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 31-53.
4.
Bowey, J.A. (2005). Individual differences in early reading ability . In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155-172). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
5.
Bowey, J.A., McGuigan, M., & Ruschena, A. (2005). On the association between serial naming speed and word-reading skill: Towards a developmental account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400-422.
Cataldo, S., & Ellis, N.C. (1988). Spelling, reading and phonological skills in interactive development. Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 86-109.
8.
Catts, H.W., & Kamhi, A.G. (2005). The connections between language and reading disabilities . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
9.
Clarke, P., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Individual difference in RAN and reading: A response timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 73-86.
10.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Compton, D.L., Davis, C.J., DeFries, J.D., Gayçn, J., & Olson, R.K. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on reading and RAN: An overview of results from the Colorado twin studies. In M .Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. Timonium, MD: York.
12.
Compton, D.L., DeFries, J.C., & Olson, R.K. (2001). Are RAN and phonological awareness deficits additive in children with reading disabilities? Dyslexia, 7, 125-149.
13.
Conners, C.K. (1997). Conners' Rating Scales-Revised: Technical manual . New York: Multi-Health Systems .
14.
Conners, C.K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J.D., & Epstein, J.N. (1998). The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 257-268.
15.
Cornwall, A. (1992). The relationship of phonological awareness, rapid naming, and verbal memory to severe reading and spelling disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 532-538.
16.
Denckla, M.B., & Cutting, L.E. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29-42.
17.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1996). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18.
Evans, M.A., Shaw, D., & Bell, M. (2000). Home literacy activities and their influence on early literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology , 54, 65-75.
19.
Fawcett, A.J., & Nicolson, R. (1996). The Dyslexia Screening Test. London: Psychological Corporation.
20.
Fawcett, A., Nicolson, R., & MacLagan, F. (2001). Cerebellar tests differentiate between groups of poor readers with and without IQ discrepancy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 119-135.
21.
Fletcher-Flinn, C.M., Shankweiler, D., & Frost, R. (2004). Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 617-644.
22.
Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, B.A., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98-108.
23.
Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495-515). London: Academic Press.
24.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia . In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301-326). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
25.
Gathercole, S.E., Alloway, T.P., Willis, C., & Adams, A.-M. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 265-281.
26.
Goulandris, N.K., Snowling, M.J., & Walker, I. (2000). Is dyslexia a form of specific language impairment? A comparison of dyslexic and language impaired children as adolescents. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 103-120.
Henderson, S.E., & Sugden, D.A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. London: Psychological Corporation.
29.
Kail, R., & Hall, L.K. (1994). Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30, 949-954.
30.
Kamhi, A.G., & Catts, H.W. (1986). Towards an understanding of developmental language and reading disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders , 51, 337-347.
31.
Kazlaukaite, V., & Lynn, R. (2002). Two year test-retest reliability of the Colored Progressive Matrices. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 354.
32.
Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 267-289.
33.
Kirby, J., Parrila, R.K., & Pfeiffer, S.L. , (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
34.
Levy, B.A., Abello, B., & Lyschynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173-188.
35.
Manis, F.R., Doi, L.M., & Bhada, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 325-333.
36.
Manis, F.R., & Freedman, L. (2001). The relationship of naming to multiple reading measures in disabled and non-disabled normal readers. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency and the brain (pp. 65-92). Timonium, MD: York .
37.
Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M., & Doi, L.M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129-157.
38.
Maxwell, S.E., & Delaney, H.D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181-190.
39.
Meyer, M.S., Wood, F.B., Hart, L.A., & Felton, R.H. (1998). Longitudinal course of rapid naming in disabled and nondisabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 91-114.
40.
Närhi, V., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Leppäsaari, T., Korhonen, T.T., Tolvanen, A., et al. (2004). Rapid serial naming: Relations between different stimuli and neuropsychological factors. Brain and Language, 92, 45-57.
41.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M.J. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359-370.
42.
Neale, M.D. (1997). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (2nd rev. British ed.). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson Education.
43.
Neuhaus, G., Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., & Carlson, C.D. (2001). Measures of information processing in rapid automatized naming (RAN) and their relation to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 359-373.
44.
Neuhaus, G.F., & Swank, P.R. (2002). Understanding the relations between RAN letter subtest components and word reading in first grade students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 158-174.
45.
Nicolson, R.I., & Fawcett, A. (2001). Dyslexia as a learning disability. In A. J. Fawcett (Ed.), Dyslexia: Theory and good practice (pp. 141-159). London: Whurr.
46.
Pennington, B.F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P.A., & Lefly, D.L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 707-755.
47.
Pennington, B.F., Groisser, D., & Welsh, M.C. (1993). Contrasting cognitive deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder versus reading disability. Developmental Psychology, 29, 511-523.
48.
Rack, J.P., & Olson, R.K. (1993). Phonological deficits and individual differences in reading disability: Genetic and environmental influences. Developmental Review, 13, 269-278.
49.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29-53.
50.
Ramus, F., Pidgeon, E., & Frith, U. (2003). The relationship between motor control and phonology in dyslexic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 44, 712-722.
Romani, C., Olson, A., & Di Betta, A.M. (2005). Spelling disorders. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 431-447). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
53.
Savage, R.S. (2001). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading , 10, 143-164.
54.
Savage, R.S. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 301-325.
55.
Savage, R.S., & Frederickson, N. (2005). Further evidence of a link between rapid naming and text reading rate. Brain and Language, 93, 152-159.
56.
Savage, R.S., & Fredrickson, N. (2006). Beyond phonology: What else is needed to describe the problems of poor readers and spellers? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 399-413.
57.
Savage, R.S., Fredrickson, N., Goodwin, R., Patni, U., Smith, N., & Tuersley, L. (2005). The relationship between rapid digit naming, phonological awareness, motor automaticity, and speech perception. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 12-28.
58.
Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 35, 245-256.
59.
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Guy, K., & Griffin, J.D. (2002). Rapid naming deficits in children and adolescents with reading disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain and Language, 74, 70-83.
60.
Shanahan, T. (1984). Nature of the reading-writing relation: An exploratory multivariate analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 466-477.
61.
Shanahan, T., & Lomax, R.G. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 116-123.
Stage, S.A., & Wagner, R. (1992). Development of young children's phonological and orthographic knowledge as revealed by their spellings. Developmental Psychology, 28, 287-296.
64.
Strattman, K., & Hodson, B.W. (2005). Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers. Child Language and Therapy, 21, 165-190.
65.
Sunseth, K., & Bowers, G.B. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401-429.
66.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon .
67.
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first grade children . New York: Oxford University Press .
68.
Venezky, R.L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
69.
Vukovic, R.K., & Siegel, L.S. (2006). The double deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 39, 25-47.
70.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Development of reading related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
71.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
72.
Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). The Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
73.
Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272-277.
74.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321-340.
75.
Wolf, M. (Ed.). (2001). Dyslexia, fluency and the brain. Timonium, MD: York.
76.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The double deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-24.
77.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming speed processes. Timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
78.
Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211-229.
79.
Wolf, M., & O'Brien, B. (2001). On issues of time, fluency and intervention. In A. Fawcett (Ed.), Dyslexia: Theory and good practice (pp. 124-140). London: Whurr.
80.
Wolf, M., O'Rourke, G.A., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43-72.
81.
Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
82.
Young, A., & Bowers, P.G. (1995). Individual difference and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 428-454.
83.
Ziegler, J.C., Stone, G.O., & Jacobs, A.M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers , 29, 600-618.
