Do Word-Problem Features Differentially Affect Problem Difficulty as a Function of Students' Mathematics Difficulty With and Without Reading Difficulty?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2009
Do Word-Problem Features Differentially Affect Problem Difficulty as a Function of Students' Mathematics Difficulty With and Without Reading Difficulty?
This study examined whether and, if so, how word-problem features differentially affect problem difficulty as a function of mathematics difficulty (MD) status: no MD (n = 109), MD only (n = 109), or MD in combination with reading difficulties (MDRD; n = 109). The problem features were problem type (total, difference, or change) and position of missing information in the number sentence representing the word problem (first, second, or third position). Students were assessed on 14 word problems near the beginning of third grade. Consistent with the hypothesis that mathematical cognition differs as a function of MD subtype, problem type affected problem difficulty differentially for MDRD versus MD-only students; however, the position of missing information in word problems did not. Implications for MD subtyping and for instruction are discussed.
Andersson, U., & Lyxell, B. (2007). Working memory deficit in children with mathematical difficulties: A general or specific deficit? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 197-228.
2.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A new and powerful approach to multiple testing. The Annals of Statistics , 29, 1165-1188.
3.
Carpenter, T.P., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J.M. (1981). Problem structure and first-grade children's initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 27-39.
4.
Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1983). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts . In R. A. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 7-44). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Cirino, P.T., Fletcher, J.M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Barnes, M.A., & Fuchs, L.S. (2007). Cognitive arithmetic differences in learning difficulty groups and the role of behavioral inattention. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 25-35.
6.
DeCorte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders' strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education , 18, 363-381.
7.
Fuchs, L.S., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J.D., & Hamlett, C.L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology , 97, 493-513.
8.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading difficulties . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563-573.
9.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Prentice, K. (2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 37, 293-306.
10.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J., Hamlett, C.L., & Lambert, W. (2008). Problem-solving and computational skill: Are they shared or distinct aspects of mathematical cognition? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 30-47.
11.
Garcia, A.I., Jiménez, J.E., & Hess, S. (2006). Solving arithmetic word problems: An analysis of classification as a function of difficulty in children with and without arithmetic LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 270-281.
12.
Geary, D.C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24-37.
13.
Geary, D.C., Hamson, C.O., & Hoard, M.K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263.
14.
Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., & Hamson, C.O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213-239.
15.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Groen, G.J., & Parkman, J.M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329-343.
17.
Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R.S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 25-33.
18.
Hanich, L.B., Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615-626.
19.
Hecht, S.A., Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 192-227.
20.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods in meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21.
Hoover, H.D., Hieronymous, A.N., Dunbar, S.B., & Frisbie, D.A. (1993). Iowa test of basic skills. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
22.
Jordan, N.C., & Hanich, L.B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 567-578.
23.
Jordan, N.C., & Hanich, L.B. (2003). Features of children with moderate mathematics deficiencies: A longitudinal perspective. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 213-221.
24.
Jordan, N.C., Hanich, L.B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834-850.
25.
Jordan, N.C., & Montani, T.O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624-634.
26.
Lewis, A.B., & Mayer, R.E. (1987). Miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 363-371.
27.
Mazzocco, M. (2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 318-232.
28.
Parmar, R.S., Cawley, J.F., & Frazita, R.R. (1996). Word-problem solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415-429.
29.
Pellegrino, J.W., & Goldman, S.R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23-32, 57.
30.
The Psychological Corporation. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
31.
Riley, M.S., & Greeno, J.G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction , 5, 49-101.
32.
Robinson, C.S., Menchetti, B.M., & Torgesen, J.K. (2002). Toward a two-factor theory of one type of mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 81-89.
33.
Rourke, B.P., & Finlayson, A.M. (1978). Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 121-133.
34.
Schatschneider, C., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. (2006, May). Understanding/preventing math problem-solving disability. Presented at the annual meeting of the Math Network within the National Institute of Child Health and Development , Bethesda, MD.
35.
Swanson, H.L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249-274.
36.
Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). Wide range achievement test-revision 3. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
