The authors investigated whether practice in reading fluency had a causal influence on the relationship between working memory (WM) and text comprehension for 155 students in Grades 2 and 4 who were poor or average readers. Dysfluent readers were randomly assigned to repeated reading or continuous reading practice conditions and compared with untreated dysfluent and fluent readers on posttest measures of fluency, word identification, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. Three main findings emerged: (a) The influence of WM on text comprehension was not related to fluency training, (b) dysfluent readers in the continuous-reading condition had higher posttest scores than dysfluent readers in the other conditions on measures of text comprehension but not on vocabulary, and (c) individual differences in WM better predicted posttest comprehension performance than word-attack skills. In general, the results suggested that although continuous reading increased comprehension, fluency practice did not compensate for WM demands. The results were interpreted within a model that viewed reading comprehension processes as competing for a limited supply of WM resources that operate independent of fluency.
Allinder, R.M., Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. ( 1998). Curriculum-based measurement. In H. B. Vance (Ed.), Psychoeducational assessment of children: Best practices for school and clinic setting (2nd ed., pp. 106-132). New York: John Wiley.
2.
Allington, R. ( 2001). What really matters for struggling readers? Designing research-based programs. New York: Longman.
3.
Baddeley, A.D., & Logie, R.H. ( 1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Baker, S., Simmons, D., & Kame’enui, E. (1995). Vocabulary acquisition: Synthesis of the research (Technical Report No. 13). Eugene : University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
5.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
Biemiller, A. ( 2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In A. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223-242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. London: Sage Ltd.
8.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. ( 2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills . Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42.
9.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. ( 2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology , 96(4), 671-681.
10.
Chard, D.J., Stoolmiller, M., Harn, B.A., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., et al. (2008). Predicting reading success in a multilevel schoolwide reading model: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 174-188.
11.
Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. ( 2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
12.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . New York: Academic Press .
13.
Daane, M.C., Campbell, J.R., Grigg, W.S., Goodman, W.J., & Orange, A. ( 2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
15.
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P.M. ( 1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 442-433.
16.
de Jong, P. ( 1998). Working memory deficits of reading disabled children . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 75-95.
17.
Denton, C.A., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Bryan, D. ( 2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 79-89.
18.
Dunn, L.M., Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D.M. ( 1997). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
19.
Ehri, L.C. ( 1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Engle, R.W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J.J. ( 1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 972-992.
21.
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 16-23.
22.
Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. ( 2003). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language , 51, 136-158.
23.
Goff, D., Pratt, C., & Ong, B. ( 2005). The relationship between children’s reading comprehension, working memory, language skills, and components of reading decoding in a normal sample. Reading and Writing, 18, 583-616.
24.
Herdman, C., & LeFevre, J. ( 1992). Individual differences in the efficiency of word recognition . Educational Psychology, 84, 95-105.
25.
Herman, P. ( 1985). The effect of repeated readings on reading rate, speech pauses, and word recognition accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly , 20, 553-565.
26.
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (1992). Deficits in output phonology: An explanation of reading failure? Cognitive Neuropsychology , 9(1), 47-72.
27.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. ( 2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719-729.
28.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review , 99, 122-149.
29.
Kail, R., & Hall, L.K. ( 1999). Sources of developmental change in children’s word-problem performance. Journal of Educational Psychology , 91, 660-668.
30.
Klingberg, T., Fernell, E., Olesen, P.J., Johnson, M., Gustafsson, P., & Dahlström, K. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD-A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , 44, 177-186.
31.
Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. ( 2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices . Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
32.
Kyllonen, P.C., & Christal, R.E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity!Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
33.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. ( 1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
34.
Levy, B., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. ( 1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 20, 173-188.
35.
Logan, G.D. ( 1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 123-146.
36.
Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, K.A., & Frijters, J.C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334-358.
37.
Luo, D., Thompson, L.A., & Detterman, D.K. (2006). The criterion validity of tasks of basic processes. Intelligence, 34, 2006.
38.
Mathes, P.G., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 8(4), 233-243.
39.
McKeown, M., Beck, I., Omanson, R., & Pople, M. ( 1985). Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 522-535.
40.
Nation, K., Adams, J.W., Bowyer-Crane, C.A., & Snowling, M.J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139-158.
41.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
42.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Oakhill, J.V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P.E. ( 2003). Dissociation of single-word reading and text comprehension . Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468.
44.
O’Connor, R.E., Bell, K.M., Harty, K.R., Larkin, L.K., Sackor, S., & Zigmond, N. ( 2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 474-485.
45.
O’Connor, R.E., White, A., & Swanson, H.L. ( 2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children , 74, 31-46.
46.
Paris, S. ( 2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills . Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184-202.
47.
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. ( 2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension . Memory & Cognition, 29, 344-354.
48.
Perfetti, C. ( 1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Pinnel, G.S., Pikulski, J.J., Wixson, K.K., Campbell, J.R., Gough, P.B., & Beatty, A.S. ( 1995). Listening to children read aloud. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
50.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. ( 1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28-53.
51.
Reutzel, D.R., & Hollingsworth, P.M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders’ reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325-331.
52.
Roshotte, C.A., & Torgesen, J.K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly , 20(2), 180-188.
53.
Rupley, W.H., Willson, V.L., & Nichols, W.D. ( 1998). Exploration of the developmental components contributing to elementary school children’s reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 143-158.
54.
SAS Institute. (2003). SAS/STAT user’s guide. Cary, NC: Author .
55.
Schreiber, P.A. ( 1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 177-186.
56.
Schwanenflugel, P.J., Meisinger, E.B., Wisenbaker, J.M., Kuhn, M.R., Strauss, G.P., & Morris, R.D. ( 2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly , 41, 496-522.
57.
Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.F., Oakhill, J.V., & Yuill, N.M. ( 2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension. Reading & Writing, 13, 81-103.
58.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
59.
Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. ( 1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder. Cognition, 24, 139-168.
60.
Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A.E., Liberman, A.M., Brady, S.A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax . Psychological Science, 6, 149-156.
61.
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E.B. ( 1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled. Child Development , 60, 973-980.
62.
Simmons, D.C., Coyne, M.D., Kwok, O., McDonagh, S., Harn, B.A., & Kame’enui, E.J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 158-173.
63.
Singer, J.D. ( 2002). Fitting individual growth models using SAS PROC MIXED . In S. L. Hersberger & D. S. Moskowitz (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications (pp. 135-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K.E. ( 1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
66.
Stanovich, K.E. ( 1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
67.
Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L.S. ( 1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
68.
Stothard, S., & Hulme, C. ( 1996). A comparison of reading comprehension and decoding difficulties in children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties in children: Processes and intervention (pp. 95-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69.
Swanson, H.L. ( 1996) Individual and age-related differences in children’s working memory. Memory & Cognition, 24, 70-82.
70.
Swanson, H.L. ( 1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in skilled readers: Is the phonological loop more important than the executive system ? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 1-31.
71.
Swanson, H.L., & Ashbaker, M. ( 2000). Working memory, short-term memory, articulation speed, word recognition, and reading comprehension in learning disabled readers: Executive and/or articulatory system?Intelligence, 28, 1-30.
72.
Swanson, H.L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471-491.
73.
Swanson, H.L., Howard, C., & Sáez, L. (2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 252-269.
74.
Swanson, H.L., Kehler, P., & Jerman, O. (in press). Working memory, declarative knowledge, and strategies in children with reading disabilities.
75.
Swanson, H.L., & Trahan, M. ( 1996). Learning disabled and average readers’ working memory and comprehension: Does metacognition play a role? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 333-355.
76.
Swanson, H.L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D.M., & Hammill, D.D. ( 2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlation evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407-440.
77.
Therrien, W.J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. ( 2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 89-97.
78.
Thorell, L.B., Lindqvist, S., Nutley, S.B., Bohlin, G., & Klingberg, T. ( 2009). Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Developmental Science, 12, 106-113.
79.
Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.K., & Conway, T. ( 2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58, 78.
80.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R.W. ( 2007). On the division of short-term memory and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038-1066.
81.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early identification as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology , 88, 601-638.
82.
Verhaeghen, P., & Salthouse, T.A. (1997). Meta-analysis of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231-249.
83.
Waters, G.S., & Caplin, D. ( 1996). A capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just & Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103, 761-772.
Willcutt, E.G., Pennington, B.F., Olson, R.K., Chhabildas, N., & Hulslander, J. (2005). Neuropsychological analyses of comorbidity between reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: In search of the common deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology , 27(1), 35-78.
86.
Woodcock, R. ( 1998). The Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised/ Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
87.
Yuill, N.M., & Oakhill, J.V. ( 1991). Children’s problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
