A pre-post experimental design with 6-week delayed posttest was implemented to investigate the effects of reading comprehension strategy (RCS) instruction with and without attribution retraining (AR) on reading outcomes for seventh, eighth, and ninth graders with learning and other mild disabilities. Students were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: RCS+AR, RCS, or a Read Naturally (Ihnot, 1992) comparison condition. Results indicated that compared to the comparison group, both strategy instruction groups performed better on a summarization measure of comprehension after treatment producing large effect sizes. Both groups also performed better after a 6-week delay; however, only the RCS+AR group maintained a large effect size. In addition, RCS+AR students displayed higher attributions for reading success at post- and delayed posttesting. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Barton, M.L. ( 1997). Addressing the literacy crisis: Teaching reading in the content areas. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 81, 22-30. doi: 10.1177/019263659708158705
3.
Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (in press). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995-2006. Remedial & Special Education.
4.
Borkowski, J.G., Carr, M., Rellinger, L., & Pressley, M. ( 1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions and self-esteem. In B. J. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 53-92). London : Routledge.
5.
Borkowski, J.G., Weyhing, R.S., & Carr, M. ( 1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.46
6.
Carr, M., & Borkowski, J.G. (1989). Attributional training and the generalization of reading strategies with underachieving children . Learning & Individual Differences, 1, 327-341. doi: 10.1016/1041-6080(89)90015-0
7.
Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievements. ( 2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
8.
Chan, L.K.S. ( 1996). Combined strategy and attributional training for seventh grade average and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading , 19, 111-127. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1996 .tb00092.x
Edmonds, M.S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K.K., & Schnakenberg, J.W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262-300. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325998
11.
Esser, M.M.S. ( 2001). The effects of metacognitive strategy training and attribution retraining on reading comprehension in African-American students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(7-A), 2340. (UMI No. 3021672)
12.
Ford, M.E. ( 1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
13.
Gajria, M., Jitendra, A.K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. ( 2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 40, 210-225. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400030301
14.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Williams, J., & Baker, S. ( 2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320. doi: 10.3102/00346543071002279
15.
Ihnot, C. ( 1992). Read naturally. St. Paul, MN: Read Naturally.
16.
Jitendra, A.K., Hoppes, M.K., & Xin, Y.P. ( 2000). Enhancing summary comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction . Journal of Special Education, 34, 127-139. doi: 10.1177/002246690003400302
17.
Johnson, L., Graham, S., & Harris, K. ( 1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study of students with learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80-91. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000107
18.
Katims, D.S., & Harris, S. ( 1997). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41, 116-123. http://www.reading.org
19.
LaJoie, S.P. ( 2008). Metacognition, self regulation and self regulated learning: A rose by any other name?Educational Psychology Review, 20, 469-475. doi: 10.1007/s10648-008-9088-1
20.
Lenz, B.K., Ellis, E.S., & Scanlon, D. ( 1996). Teaching learning strategies to adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. ( 1996). Reflections on "Promoting thinking skills of students with learning disabilities: Effects on recall and comprehension of expository prose."Exceptionality, 6, 53-57. doi: 10.1207/ s15327035ex0601_1
22.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J.E. ( 2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103-116.
23.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Mohler, L., Beranek, M., Boon, R., Spencer, V., & Talbott, E. ( 2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 18-27. doi: 10.1111/0938-8982.00003
24.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. ( 2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 52-65. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00057
25.
Miranda, A., Villaescusa, M.I., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (1997). Is attribution retraining necessary? Use of self-regulation procedures for enhancing the reading comprehension strategies of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 503-512. doi: 10.1177/002221949703000506
26.
Nelson, J.M., & Manset-Williamson, G. (2006). The impact of explicit, self-regulatory reading comprehension strategy instruction on the reading-specific self-efficacy, attributions, and affect of students with reading disabilities . Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 213-230.
27.
Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E.S. ( 1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text . Educational Psychologist, 25, 19-33. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_3
28.
Robertson, J.S. ( 2000). Is attribution retraining a worthwhile classroom intervention for K-12 students with learning difficulties?Educational Psychology Review, 12, 111-134. doi: 10.1023/A:1009089118008
29.
Saenz, L.M., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31-41. doi: 10.1177/074193250202300105
30.
Schmitt, M.C. ( 1990). A questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, 43, 454-461.
31.
Schunk, D.H., & Cox, P.D. ( 1986). Strategic training and attributional feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 201-209. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.201
32.
Shell, D., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. ( 1995). Self-efficacy, attribution and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences . Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386-398. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.386
33.
Stipek, D.J. ( 1993). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
Stipek, D.J., & Weiz, J.R. ( 1981). Perceived personal control and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 51, 101-137. doi: 10.3102/00346543051001101
35.
Swanson, H.L. ( 1999). Reading research for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200605
36.
Tabassam, W., & Grainger, J. ( 2002). Self-concept, attributional style and self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 141-151.
37.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D.J. ( 2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
38.
Weaver, C.A., & Kintsch, W. ( 1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 230-244). White Plains, NY: Longman.
39.
Wixson, K.K., & Lipson, M.Y. ( 1991). Perspectives on reading disability research. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 539-570). White Plains, NY: Longman.
40.
Wong, B.Y.L., Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Butler, D.L. ( 2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383-402). New York, NY: Guilford.
