Measuring Impulsivity-Reflection

Abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT), which was devised to measure conceptual tempo. The construct of impulsivity-reflection has been widely investigated by psychologists and educators. Epstein, Hallahan, and Kauffman (1975), in a recent review of literature, present evidence suggesting a significant relationship between impulsivity-reflection and the school learning problems of exceptional children. There are, however, general measurement problems associated with the MFFT that need to be considered. Data from this present study and from others may be interpreted to indicate that there are problems with the reliability and validity of the MFFT. The construct of impulsivity-reflection has validity, but the procedure used to measure this aspect of problem-solving needs to be re-examined. Studies using the MFFT should be interpreted with caution.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ault, R. , Mitchell, C. , Hartmann, D. : Some methodological problems in reflection-impulsivity research. Child Development, 1976, 47, 227–231.

Becker, L. : Conceptual tempo and the early detection of learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1976, 9, 433–442.

Block, J. , Block, J. , Harrington, D. : Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 611–632.

Egeland, B. , Weinberg, R. : The Matching Familiar Figures Test: A look at its psychometric credibility. Child Development, 1976, 47, 483–491.

Epstein, M. , Hallahan, D. , Kauffman, J. : Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education. Journal of Special Education, 1975, 9, 11–25.

Forness, S. : Screening kindergarten children for early intervention through direct observation of classroom behavior (technical report). Los Angeles: University of California, 1973.

Kagan, J. : Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child Development, 1965, 36, 609–628.

Kagan, J. : Reflection impulsivity. The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966, 7, 17–24.

Kagan, J. , Rosman, B. , Day, D. , Albert J. , Phillips, W. : Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs General and Applied, 1964, 78, 1–37.

10.

Keogh, B. : Psychological evaluation of exceptional children: Old hangups and new directions. Journal of School Psychology, 1972, 10, 141–146.

11.

Keogh, B. , Donlon, J. : Field dependence, impulsivity, and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972, 5, 331–337.

12.

Keogh, B. , Hall, B. , Becker, L. : Early identification of exceptional children of educational programming (technical report). Los Angeles: University of California, 1974.

13.

Messer, S. : Reflection-impulsivity: Stability and school failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 61, 487–490.

14.

Salkind, N. : Errors and latency on the MFFT: A reassignment of classification strategies. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 1975.

15.

Zelniker, T. , Jeffrey, W. , Ault, R. , Parsons, J. : Analysis and modification of search strategies of impulsive and reflective children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Child Development, 1972, 43, 321–335.