Four groups of girls—hyperactive, reading disabled, hyperactive and reading disabled, or solely attention disordered—were contrasted with male counterparts on measures of intelligence, achievement, personality, and cognitive style. Across groups, significant sex differences were found for WISC-R measures, WRAT arithmetic, parent-rated aggressivity, Children's Personality Questionnaire (CPQ) profiles. Children's Embedded Figures Test (CEFT) scores, and self-rated augmentation. For the girls, reading-spelling achievement was robustly associated with WISC-R Verbal scores, while for the boys Sequential Memory scores provided the stronger link. For the girls but not boys cognitive style measures formed a fairly cohesive cluster, as did measures of augmentation, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. The boys' but not girls' color-naming speeds and CEFT scores were strongly correlated with age. Within and across sexes, the groups could be discriminated by their WISC-R profiles, arithmetic scores, and ratings of aggressivity. Solely hyperactive subjects were unexpectedly the most sensitive to omissions of details (Leveling-Sharpening task), but groups did not differ on other cognitive style measures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P.T., Holcomb, P.J., McCray, D.S., & Dykman, R.A.Studies of nervous system sensitivity in children with learning and attention disorders. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 1982, 17, 30–41.
2.
Ackerman, P.T., Oglesby, D.M., & Dykman, R.A.A contrast of hyperactive, learning disabled, and hyperactive-learning disabled boys. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1981, 10, 168–172.
3.
Bannatyne, A.Language, Reading and Learning Disabilities. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1971.
4.
Battle, E.S., & Locey, B.A context for hyperactivity in children over time. Child Development, 1972, 43, 757–773.
5.
Broverman, D.M., Klaiber, E.L., Kobayaski, K., & Vogel, W.Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 23–50.
6.
Buchsbaum, M.Self-regulation of stimulus intensity: Augmenting/reducing and the average evoked response. In G.E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self-regulation (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Publishing, 1976, pp. 101–135.
7.
Campbell, S.B.Cognitive styles and behavior problems of clinic boys: A comparison of epileptic, hyperactive, learning disabled, and normal groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1974, 2, 307–312.
8.
Canning, P.M.Orr, R.R., & Rourke, B.P.Sex differences in the perceptual, visual-motor, linguistic, and concept-formation abilities of retarded readers?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 563–567.
9.
Cantwell, D.P.Familial-genetic research with lryperactive children. In D.P. Cantwell (Ed.), The Hyperactive Child: Diagnosis, Management. Current Research, New York: Spectrum, 1975.
10.
Conners, C.K.A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 126, 152–156.
11.
Conners, C.K.Symptom patterns in hyperkinetic, neurotic, and normal children. Child Development, 1970, 41, 667–682.
12.
Guyer, B.L., & Friedman, M.P.Hemispheric processing and cognitive styles in learning-disabled and normal children. Child Development, 1975, 46, 658–668.
13.
Haier, R.J., Buchsbaum, M.S., Murphy, D.L., Gottesman, I.I., & Coursey, R.D.Psychiatric vulnerability, monoamine oxidase, and the average evoked potential. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980, 37, 340–345.
14.
Jastak, J.F., & Jastak, S.R.The Wide Range Achievement Test Manual. Wilmington, Del.: Guidance Associates, 1965.
15.
Kagan, J.Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 1964, 78 (Whole No. 518).
16.
Karp, S.A., & Konstadt, N.Manual for the Children's Embedded Figures Test. New York: Cognitive Tests, 1963.
Lahey, B.B., Stempnick, M., Robinson, E.J., & Tyroler, M.J.Hyperactivity and learning disabilities as independent dimensions of child behavior problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978, 87, 333–340.
19.
Langhorne, J.E., Loney, J., Paternite, C.T., & Bechtoldt, H.P.Childhood hyperkinesis: A return to the source. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1976, 85 (2), 201–209.
20.
Levine, M.D., Oberklaid, F., & Meltzer, L.Developmental output failure: A study of low productivity in school aged children. Pediatrics, 1981, 67, 18–25.
21.
Loney, J., Langhorne, J.E., Jr., & Paternite, C.E.An empirical basis for subgrouping the hyperkinetic/MBD syndrome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1978, 87, 431–441.
22.
Lovell, K., Shapton, D., & Warren, N.S.A study of some cognitive and other disabilities in backward readers of average intelligence as assessed by a non-verbal test. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 34, 58–64.
23.
Maccoby, E.E., & Jacklin, C.N.The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974.
24.
McGuinness, D., & Pribram, K.H.The origins of sensory bias in the development of gender differences in perception and cognition. In M. Bortner (Ed.), Cognitive Growth and Development: Essays in Memory of Herbert G. Birch. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1979, pp. 3–56.
25.
Naylor, H.Reading disability and lateral asymmetry: An information processing analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 531–545.
26.
Peters, C.C., & Van Voorhis, W.R.Statistical Procedures and Their Mathematical Bases. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1940, pp. 183–184.
27.
Petrie, A.Individuality in Pain and Suffering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
28.
Porter, R.B., & Cattell, R.B.Handbook for the Children's Personality Questionnaire. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1972.
29.
Prinz, R., & Loney, J.Teacher-rated hyperactive elementary school girls: An exploratory development study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 1974, 4, 246–257.
30.
Rudel, R.G.Learning disability: Diagnosis by exclusion and discrepancy. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1980, 19, 547–569.
31.
Santostefano, S.Cognitive controls versus cognitive styles: An approach to diagnosing and treating cognitive disabilities in children. In S. Chess & A. Thomas (Eds.), Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development. New York. Brunner/Mazel. Inc., 1970, pp. 70–103.
32.
Santostefano, S.Clinical Child Psychology—a Biodevelopmental Approach: Theory and Diagnostic Methods for Cognitive Disabilities (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.
33.
Shapiro, D.Neurotic Styles. New York: Basic Books, 1965.
34.
Teplov, B.M.Problems in the study of general types of higher nervous activity in man and animals. In J.A. Gray (Ed.), Pavlov's Typology. New York: Macmillan Co., 1964, pp. 3–153.
35.
Thorndike, R.L.Reading comprehension: Education in fifteen countries. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.
36.
Whalen, C.K. & Henker, B. (Eds.),Hyperactive Children: The Social Ecology of Identification and Treatment. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
37.
Weintraub, P.The brain: His and hers. Discover, 1981, 2, 15–20.
38.
Witelson, S.F.Sex and the single hemisphere: Right hemisphere specialization for spatial processing. Science, 1976, 193, 425–427.
39.
Witelson, S.F.Developmental dyslexia: Two right hemispheres and none left. Science, 1977, 195, 309–311.
40.
Witkin, H.A., Dyk, R.B., Paterson, H.F., Goodenough, D.R., & Karp, S.A.Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1962.
41.
Zuckerman, M., Bachsbaum, M., & Murphy, D.L.Sensation seeking and its biological correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 187–214.
