This article describes the relationship between metacognition, defined as awareness and regulation of cognitive activity, and the learning needs of students who are experiencing academic difficulty. Investigations of metacognitive instruction to enhance memory skills, to increase text comprehension, and to improve written expression and math performance arc reported. Particular attention is paid to the role of the teacher and learner in the acquisition and self-control of the targeted cognitive strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alley, G.R., & Deshler, D.D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love.
2.
Arter, J., & Jenkins, J. (1978). Differential diagnosis-prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal (Tech. Rep. No. 80). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
3.
Brown, A.L. (1975). The development of memory: Knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 103–152). New York: Academic Press.
4.
Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Closer (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol 1, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Brown, A.L., & Ferrara, R.A. (1980, October). Diagnosing zones of proximal development: An alternative to standardized testing. Paper presented at the Conference on Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, Center for Psychological Studies, Chicago.
6.
Brown, A.L, & Palincsar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1–17.
7.
Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (in press). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In J. Borkowski & J.D. Day (Eds.), Intelligence and cognition in special children: Comparative studies of giftedness, mental retardation, and learning disabilities. New York: Ablex.
8.
Budoff, M. (1972). Measuring learning potential: An alternative to the traditional intelligence test. Studies in Learning Potential, 3(39). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 085 962), 1–48.
9.
Cawley, J.F. (Ed.). (1985). Developmental teaching of mathematics for the learning disabled. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
10.
Collins, A., & Gentner, D. (1980). A framework for a cognitive theory of writing. In L. W. Gregg & E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 51–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Dawson, M.M., Hallahan, D.P., Reeve, R.E., & Ball, D. W. (1979). The effect of reinforcement and verbal rehearsal on selective attention in learning disabled children (Technical Report). Charlottesville: University of Virginia, Virginia Research Institute on Learning Disabilities.
12.
DeCorte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(6), 765–779.
13.
Englert, C.S, Hiebert. E.H., & Stewart, S.R. (1985). Spelling unfamiliar words by an analogy strategy. Journal of Special Education, 19(3), 291–30.
14.
Flower, L, & Hayes, JR. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.
15.
Gelzheiser, L.M. (1984). Generalization from categorical memory tasks to prose by learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1128–1138.
16.
Gerber, M.M. (1983). Learning disabilities and cognitive strategies: A case for training for constraining problem solving?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16(5), 255–260.
17.
Gerber, M.M. (1984, April). Generalization of spelling strategies by L.D. students as a result of contingent imitation/modeling and mastery criteria. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
18.
Golinkoff, R. (1976). A comparison of reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 11, 623–659.
19.
Gordon, C.J., & Braun, C. (1985). Metacognitive processes: Reading and writing narrative discourse. In D.L. Forrest-Pressley, G.E. MacKinnon, & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol 2, pp. 1–75). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20.
Graves, D.H. (1982). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
21.
Hall, L.K., & Day, J.D. (1984, April). Intelligence and cognitive control as predictors of generalization of learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
22.
Hammill, D., & Larsen, S. (1974). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training. Exceptional Children, 41, 6–14.
23.
Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students' composition skills: A self-control strategy training approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 27–36.
24.
Keogh, B.K., & Glover, A.T. (1980). The generality and durability of cognitive training effects. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(1), 75–82.
25.
Kurtz, B.E., & Borkowski, J.G. (1985, March). Metacognition and the development of strategic skills in impulsive and reflective children. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Toronto.
26.
Lloyd, J, Saltzman, N.J., & Kauffman, J.M. (1981). Predictable generalization in academic learning as a result of preskills and strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4(1), 203–216.
27.
Mann, L. (1979). On the trail of process. New York: Grune & Stratton.
28.
Meichenbaum, D. (1980). Cognitive behavior modification with exceptional children: A promise yet unfulfilled. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(1), 83–88.
29.
Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.
30.
Miller, G.E. (1985). The effects of general and specific self-instruction training on children's comprehension monitoring performances during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 616–628.
31.
O'Lcary, S. (1980). A response to cognitive training. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(1), 89–94.
32.
O'Sullivan, J.T., & Pressley, M. (in press). Completeness of instruction and strategy transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
33.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
34.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771–777.
35.
Paris, S., Cross, D.R., Jacobs, J.E., Oka, E.R., DeBritto, A.M., & Saarnio, DA. (1984). Improving children's metacognition and reading comprehension with classroom instruction. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
36.
Paris, S., Newman, R., & McVey, K. (1982). Learning the functional significance of mnemonic actions: microgenetic study of strategy acquisition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology: 34, 490–509.
37.
Pflaum, S.W., & Pascarella, E.T. (1980). Interactive effects of prior reading achievement and training in context on the reading of learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 138–158.
38.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & O'Sullivan, J.T. (1984). Memory strategy instruction is made of this: Metamemory and durable strategy use. Educational Psychologist, 19, 94–107.
39.
Raphael T, Kirschner, B., & Englert, C. (1985, December). Teaching expository reading and writing skills: Impact of process writing and text structure instruction on teachers and students. Paper presented at the National Reading ConferenceSan Diego, CA.
40.
Rubin, A., & Bruce, B. (1984). QUILL Reading and writing with a microcomputer. In BA. Hutson (Ed.), Advances in reading/language research (Vol. 3). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41.
Ryan, E.B. (1981). Identifying and remediating failures in reading comprehension: Toward an instructional approach, for poor comprehenders. In T.G. Walker & G.E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Advances in reading research (pp. 9–50). New York: Academic Press.
42.
Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., Alley, G, Warner, M., & Denton, P. (1984). Multipass: A learning strategy for improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(2), 295–304.
43.
Slife, B.D., Weiss, J., & Bell, T. (1985). Separability of metacognition and cognition: Problem solving in learning disabled and regular students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 437–445.
44.
Swanson, H.L. (1984). Does theory guide practice?. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 7–16.
45.
Tarver, S.G., Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, JM, & Ball, D.W. (1976). Verbal rehearsal and selection attention in children with learning disabilities: A developmental lag. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 375–385.
46.
Torgesen, J.K. (1977). Memorization processes in reading-disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 571–578.
47.
Torgesen, J.K. (1978). Performance of reading disabled children on serial memory tasks: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 57–87.
48.
Vellutino, F., Steger, B.M., Mover, S.C., Harding. C.J., & Niles, J A. (1977). Has the perceptual deficit hypothesis led us astray?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(6), 375–385.
49.
Vye, N.J., Burns, M.S., Delclos, V.R., & Bransford, J.D. (in press). Dynamic assessment of intellectually handicapped children. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Foundations and fundamentals. New York: Guilford Press.
50.
Wong B. (in press). Directions in future research on metacognition in learning disabilities. In H.L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51.
Wong B., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(2), 228–238.
