The concept of paradigm as a set of ontological and epistemological benchmarks is the basis for a discussion of the influence the Newtonian mechanistic paradigm has exerted over special education theory, research, and practice. Discussions of “malcontents” with the mechanistic paradigm across the social sciences and within special education are noted. Recent literature in the field of special education is critiqued for renaming theories as paradigms, thereby leaving mechanistic assumptions in place. The contours are then drawn of theoretical reorientations and of the emerging alternative holistic paradigm and its importance for special education. It is concluded that we do not have paradigms or paradigm shifts within the field, but that the field is part of a paradigm that is undergoing change across the sciences and social sciences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H.S., & Taylor, L. (1986). An introduction to learning disabilities. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
2.
Battista, J.R. (1982). The holistic paradigm and general systems theory. In W. Gray, J. Fidler, & J. Battista (Eds.), General systems theory and the psychological sciences (Vol. I) (pp. 209–210). Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.
3.
Berman, M. (1984). The reenchantment of the world. New York: Bantam Books.
4.
Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivity and relativity: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Biklen, D. (1985). Achieving the complete school, strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
Blatt, B. (1984). On distorting reality to comprehend distortion. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 627–628.
7.
Blatt, B., Biklen, D., & Bogdan, R. B. (Eds.). (1977). An alternative textbook in special education. Denver: Love.
8.
Bogdan, R.B., & Taylor, S.A. (1982). Inside out. The social meaning of mental retardation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
9.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Simon & Schuster.
11.
Capra, F. (1986). The concept of paradigm and paradigm shift. Revision, Journal of Consciousness and Change, 9, (1), 11–17.
12.
Carnine, D. (1987). A response to “False standards, a distorting and disintegrating effect on education, turning away from useful purposes, being inevitably unfulfilled, and remaining unrealistic and irrelevant.”Remedial and Special Education, 8, (1), 42–43.
13.
Carrier, J.G. (1983). Explaining educability: An investigation of political support for the Children with Learning Disabilities Act of 1969. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 4, (2), 125–140.
14.
Church, S., & Newman, J.M. (1986). Danny. A case history of an instructionally induced reading problem. In J.M. Newman (Ed.), Whole language, theory and practice (pp. 169–179). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
Cousins, N. (1985). Nobel Prize conversations by Sir John Eccles, Roger Sperry, Ilya Prigogine, Brian Josephson. Dallas: Saybrook Publishing.
16.
Dodson-Gray, E. (1982). Patriarchy as a conceptual trap. Wellesley, MA: Roundtable Press.
17.
Doll, W.E. (1986a). Curriculum beyond stability, Schon, Prigogine, Piaget. Paper presented at Bergamo Curriculum Conference, Bergamo, OH.
18.
Doll, W.E. (1986b). Prigogine: A new sense of order, a new curriculum. Theory Into Practice, 25, (1), 10–16.
19.
Dudley-Marling, C. (1986). Assessing the written language development of learning disabled children: An holistic perspective. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2, (1), 33–43.
20.
Edgerton, R. (1967). The cloak of competence. Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Erickson, F. (1984). School literacy, reasoning, and civility: An anthropologist's perspective. Review of Educational Research, 54, (4), 525–546.
22.
Ewoldt, C. (1982). The Kendall demonstration elementary school language arts curriculum guide. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, KDES Outreach.
23.
Ewoldt, C. (1985). A descriptive study of the developing literacy of young hearing-impaired children. Volta Review, 87, (5), 109–126.
24.
Fisher, C.T., & Rizzo, A.A. (1974). A paradigm for humanizing special education. The Journal of Special Education, 8, 321–329.
25.
Forness, S.R., & Kavale, K.A. (1987). Holistic inquiry and the scientific challenge in special education: A reply to Iano. Remedial and Special Education, 8, (1), 47–51.
26.
Fox, H. (1983). Original blessing. A primer in creation spirituality. Santa Fe, NM: Bear & Co.
27.
French, M. (1985). Beyond power. On woman, men, and morals. New York: Ballantine.
28.
Frye, N. (1981). Where metaphors and equations meet: A convergence of the arts and sciences. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21, (7), 64
29.
Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, (3), 266–275.
30.
Gergen, K., & Gergen, M. (1982). Explaining human conduct: Form and function. In P. Secord (Ed.), Explaining human behavior: Consciousness, human action, and social structure (pp. 127–154). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Giroux, H.A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53, (3), 257–293.
32.
Gould, S.J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
33.
Graves, D.H. (1985). All children can write. Learning Disabilities Focus, 1, (1), 36–43.
34.
Hasselbriis, P. (1982). I.E.P.s and a whole language model of language arts. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 1, (4), 17–21.
35.
Heshusius, L. (1981). Meaning in life as experienced by persons labeled retarded in a group home: A participant observation study. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
36.
Heshusius, L. (1982). At the heart of the advocacy dilemma: A mechanistic world view. Exceptional Children, 49, 6–13.
37.
Heshusius, L. (1984a). The survival story of a non-reader: An interview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 472–476.
38.
Heshusius, L. (1984b). Why would they and I want to do it? A phenomenological-theoretical view of special education. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 363–368.
39.
Heshusius, L. (1986a). Paradigm shifts and special education: A response to Ulman and Rosenberg. Exceptional Children, 52, 461–465.
40.
Heshusius, L. (1986b). Pedagogy, special education, and the lives of young children: A critical and futuristic perspective. Journal of Education, 168, (3), 25–38.
41.
Heshusius, L. (1988). The arts, science, and the study of exceptionality. Exceptional Children, 55, (1), 60–66.
42.
Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43.
Holzman, L., & LaCerva, C. (1986). Development, learning and learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Learning Disabilities, Kansas City, MO.
44.
Iano, R.P. (1986). The study and development of teaching: With implications for the advancement of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7, (5), 50–61.
45.
Iano, R.P. (1987). Rebuttal: Neither the absolute certainty of prescriptive law nor a surrender to mysticism. Remedial and Special Education, 8, (1), 52–61.
46.
Jacob, E. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57, (1), 1–50.
47.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of education. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
48.
Johnson, M.C. (1977). A review of research methods in education. Chicago: Rand McNally.
49.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1985). Learning disability and the history of science: Paradigm or paradox?Remedial and Special Education, 6, (4), 12–23.
50.
Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London: Hutchinson.
51.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56, (3), 257–277.
55.
Leigh, J.E. (1980). Whole language approaches: Premises and possibilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 62–69.
56.
LeShan, L., & Margenau, H. (1982). Einstein's space and van Gogh's sky. Physical reality and beyond. New York: Macmillan.
57.
Lewis, F. (1983, November 13). Quantum mechanics of politics and life. Des Moines Sunday Register, pp. 1, 3.
58.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
59.
Lloyd, J.W. (1987). The art and science of research on teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 8, (1), 44–46.
60.
Mann, L., & Phillips, W.A. (1967). Fractional practices in special education: A critique. Exceptional Children, 33, 311–317.
61.
Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Mosgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 59–89). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62.
McDermott, R.P. (1974). Achieving school failure: An anthropological approach to illiteracy and social stratification. In G.D. Spindler (Ed.), Education and cultural process: Toward an anthropology of education (pp. 82–118). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
63.
McDermott, R.P. (1977). The ethnography of speaking and reading. In R. Shuy (Ed.), Linguistics (pp. 153–185). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
64.
McKean, K. (1985). Intelligence: New ways to measure the wisdom of man. Discover, 6, (10), 25–41.
65.
McNutt, G. (1984). A holistic approach to language arts instruction in the resource room. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 315–320.
66.
Meek, M., Armstrong, S., Austerfield, V., Graham, J., & Plackett, E. (1983). Achieving literacy. Longitudinal studies of adolescents learning to read. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
67.
Mehan, H., Hertweck, A., & Meihls, L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped. Decision making in students' educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
68.
Messick, S. (1984). Assessment in context: Appraising student performance in relation to instructional quality. Educational Researcher, 13, (1), 3–8.
69.
Miller, C.M.M. (1985). The viability of students with special learning needs remaining in regular classrooms: Perceptions of students, teachers, parents and administrators, and observations of teachers' responses to student diversity. Unpublished thesis, York University, Toronto.
70.
Mitchell, R.M. (1980). Is professionalism succumbing to a push-button mentality?Counterpoint, 1, (2), 14
71.
Morgan, G.M. (1983). Beyond method. Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
72.
Ogilvy, J. (1986). The current shift of paradigms. Revision, A Journal of Consciousness and Change, 9, (1), 11–17.
73.
Popkewitz, T.S. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research. The social functions of the intellectual. New York: Falmer Press.
74.
Polkinghorne, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
75.
Poplin, M. (1984a). Research practices in learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 2–5.
76.
Poplin, M. (1984b). Summary rationalizations, apologies and farewell: What we don't know about the learning disabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 130–135.
77.
Poplin, M. (1984c). Toward an holistic view of persons with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 290–294.
78.
Poplin, M. (1985). Reductionism from the medical model to the classroom: The past, present and future of learning disabilities. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavior, 10, (1&2), 37–70.
79.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. Man's new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.
80.
Radencich, M.C. (1984). The status of learning disabilities: The emergence of a paradigm or a paradigm shift?Learning Disabilities, 3, (7), 79–89.
81.
Randall, F. (1984). Why scholars become story-tellers. The New York Times Book Review, pp. 1, 31.
82.
Reid, D.K., & Hresko, W.P. (1981). A cognitive approach to learning disabilities. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
83.
Rhodes, L.K., & Dudley-Marling, C.C. (1988). Teaching reading and writing to learning disabled and remedial learners: A holistic perspective. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
84.
Rhodes, W.C. (1987). Ecology and the new physics. Behavior Disorders, 13, (1), 58–61.
85.
Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiparadigm science. The American Sociologist, 10, 156–167.
86.
Rorty, R. (1982). Method, social science and social hope. In R. Rorty (Ed.), Consequences of pragmatism (pp. 191–229). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
87.
Sadawa, D., & Caley, M.T. (1985). Dissipative structures: New metaphors for becoming in education. Educational Researcher, 14, (3), 13–25.
88.
Sanders, N. (1986). Friendship perceptions of learning disabled students. A participant observation study. Unpublished thesis, York University, Toronto.
89.
Sarason, S.B. (1981). Psychology misdirected. New York: Macmillan-The Free Press.
90.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
91.
Scully, M.G. (1980). Social scientists, unable to explain some issues, turning to humanists. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 20, (5), 1, 4.
92.
Sleeter, C.E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46–54.
93.
Smith, F. (1983). How children learn. In D. Carnine, D. Elkind, A.D. Henrickson, D. Meichenbaum, R.L. Sieben, & F. Smith (Eds.), Interdisciplinary voices in learning disabilities (pp. 187–214). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
94.
Smith, F. (1986). Insult to intelligence. New York: Arbor House.
95.
Smith, J., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15, (1), 4–12.
96.
Smith, M.L. (1982). How educators decide who is learning disabled. Challenge to psychology and public policy in the schools. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
97.
Thurman, S.K., & Widerstrom, A.H. (1985). Young children with special needs. A developmental and ecological approach. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
98.
Tomlinson, S. (1982). A sociology of special education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
99.
Torgesen, J.K. (1986). Learning disabilities theory: Its current state and future prospects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 399–407.
100.
Tucker, J.A. (1985). Curriculum-based assessment: An introduction. Exceptional Children, 52, 199–204.
101.
Ulman, J.D., & Rosenberg, M.S. (1986). Science and superstition in special education. Exceptional Children, 52, 459–460.
102.
Valle, R.S. (1981). Relativistic quantum psychology. In R.S. Valle & R. von Eckarteberg (Eds.), The metaphors of consciousness (pp. 417–434). New York: Plenum.
103.
Van Steenbergen, B. (1986, October). Holisme schreeuwt om kritische sympathie. Elseviers Magazine, pp. 81–92.
104.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1967). Robots, men and minds. New York: George Braziller.
105.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.
106.
Weaver, C. (1988). Reading process and practice. From socio-psycholinguistics to whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
107.
Willis, P.E. (1977). Learning to labour. Westmead, England: Saxon House.
108.
Winkler, K.J. (1985). Questioning the science in social science. Scholars signal a Turn to Interpretation. Chronicle of Higher Education, 30, (17), 1–3.
109.
Wolf, F.A. (1981). Taking the quantum leap. New York: Harper & Row.
