The present study examined the first impressions that are formed of boys with either learning disabilities (LD), attention deficit disorder (ADD), or both disorders, in an effort to understand better why they are so often unpopular with and rejected by their peers. The intent of the study was to remedy methodological problems of previous first-impression studies to determine whether devaluation of boys with either LD or ADD after a brief exposure is a reliable and valid finding. To this end, physical attractiveness data were gathered, children were employed as judges, subgroups of stimulus children were formed, and situational demands were varied. Results indicated that the boys with either LD or ADD were devalued relative to controls on a variety of dependent variables, including popularity. Both situational demands, as well as judgments of physical attractiveness, appeared to play a role in accounting for these differences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bryan, J., Bryan, T., & Sonnefeld, L. (1982). Being known by the company we keep: The contagion of first impressions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–294.
2.
Bryan, J., & Perlmutter, B. (1979). Immediate impressions ofLD children by female adults. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 80–88.
3.
Bryan, J., & Sherman, R. (1980). Immediate impressions of nonverbal ingratiation attempts by learning disabled boys. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 19–28.
4.
Bryan, T., & Bryan, J. (1981). Some personal and social experiences of learning disabled children. In B. Keogh (Ed.), Advances in special education (pp. 147–186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
Bryan, T,Donahue, M., & Pearl, R. (1981a). Learning disabled children's communicative competence on referential communication tasks. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 4, 383–393.
6.
Bryan, T,Donahue, M., & Pearl, R. (1981b). Learning disabled children's peer interactions during a small-group problem solving task. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 13–22.
7.
Bryan, T,Donahue, M., Pearl, R., & Sturm, C. (1981). Learning disabled children's conversational skills- The “TV talk show.”Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 250–259.
8.
Bryan, T, & Pflaum, S. (1978). Social interactions of learning disabled children: A linguistic, social, and cognitive analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 70–79.
9.
Campbell, S., & Paulauskas, S. (1979). Peer relations in hyperactive children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 233–245.
10.
Conners, C.K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 885–888.
11.
Hartup, W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 103–196, 4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
12.
Jones, E., Rock, L., Shaver, K., Goethab, G., & Ward, L. (1968). Pattern of performance and ability attribution: An unexpected primacy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 317–340.
13.
Klein, A., & Young, R. (1979). Hyperactive boys in their classroom: Assessment of teacher and peer perceptions, interactions, and classroom behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 425–442.
14.
Lambert, N.M., & Sandoval, J. (1980). The prevalence of learning disabilities in a sample of children considered hyperactive. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 33–50.
15.
Landau, S., <£ Milich, R. (1988). Social communication patterns of attention deficit disordered boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 69–81.
16.
Ledingham, J.E., Younger, A., Schwartzman, A., <£ Bergeron, C. (1982). Agreement among teacher, peer, and self-ratings of children's aggression, withdrawal, and likability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 363–372.
17.
Loney, J., & Milich, R. (1982). Hyperactivity, aggression, and inattention in clinical practice. In M. Wolraich & D.K. Routh (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 3, pp. 113–147). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
Milich, R., & Landau, S. (1982). Socialization and peer relations in hyperactive children. In K. Gadow <£ I. Bialer (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. l,pp. 283–339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19.
Ollendick, T., Francis, G., & Hart, K. (1985). Correlates of adult and child perceptions of social competency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 129–141.
20.
Pekarik, G., Prinz, R., Liebert, D.t Weintraub, S.t & Neale, J. (1976). The Pupil Evaluation Inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 83–97.
21.
Pelham, W., & Bender, M. (1982). Peer relations in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–436). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22.
Perlmutter, B., & Bryan, J. (1984). First impressions, ingratiation, and the learning disabled child. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 157–161.
23.
Riggio, R., & Friedman, H. (1985). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421–427.
24.
Rosenthat, R. (1987). Judgment studies: Design, analysis and meta-analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Stone, W., & La Greca, A. (1984). Comprehension of nonverbal communication: A reexamination of the social competencies of learning disabled children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 505–518.
26.
Wender, P. (1971). Minimal brain dysfunction in children. New York: Wiley.
27.
Whalen, C,Henker, B., Collins, B., McAuliffe, S., & Vaux, A. (1979). Peer interactions in a structured communication task: Comparisons of normal and hyperactive boys and of methylphenidate (Ritalin) and placebo effects. Child Development, 50, 388–401.
