To determine if students with learning disabilities (LD) demonstrate a higher frequency of chemical dependency than students without learning disabilities (NLD), a total of 191 adolescents with LD (101 males and 90 females) were given the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI). The sample consisted of 88 students with LD and 103 NLD students between the ages of 12 and 18. The SASSI is an objectively scored self-report inventory that accurately classifies adolescents as chemically dependent (CD) or not chemically dependent (NCD). A significantly higher proportion of students with LD than NLD students were classified as CD. Of the 30 students who were classified as CD, 70% were students with LD. A discriminant analysis indicated that the presence or absence of a learning disability was a better predictor of classification as CD or NCD than gender, ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status, or family composition. The implications for evaluation and educational planning for students with learning disabilities are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bender, W.N. (1985). Differences between learning disabled and non-learning disabled children in temperament and behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 11–18.
2.
Bender, W.N., & Smith, J.K. (1990). Classroom behavior of children and adolescents with learning disabilities: A metaanalysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 293–305.
3.
Bentler, G.J., & Bentler, P.M. (1980). The role of peer and adult models for drug taking at different stages in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 449–465.
4.
Brosnan, F. (1983). Overrepresentation of low socioeconomic students in special education programs in California. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 517–525.
5.
Bryan, T. (1982). Social skills of learning disabled children and youth: An overview. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 13–22.
6.
Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261–283.
7.
Creager, C. (1989). SASSI test breaks through denial. Professional Counseling, 4, 65.
8.
Epstein, M.H., & Cullinan, D. (1984). Behavior problems of mildly handicapped and normal adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 33–37.
9.
Fisher, G.L., & Harrison, T.C. (1992). Assessment of alcohol and other drug abuse with referred adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 172–178.
10.
Fors, S.W., & Rojek, D.G. (1983). The social and demographic correlates of adolescent drug use patterns. Journal of Drug Education, 13, 205–222.
11.
Fox, L.C., & Forbing, S.E. (1991). Overlapping symptoms of substance abuse and learning handicaps: Implications for educators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 24–39.
12.
Gregory, J.F. (1986, April). A secondary analysis of HSB data related to special education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 276 219)
13.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S.L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development.New York: Academic Press.
14.
Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., & Bachman, J.G. (1989). Drug use, drinking and smoking: National survey results from high school, college, and young adult populations, 1975-85 (DHHS Publication No. ADM 89-1638). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
La Greca, A.M., & Stone, W.L. (1990). LD status and achievement: Confounding variables in the study of children's social status, self-esteem, and behavioral functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 483–490.
16.
Leone, P.E. (1988). A study of the use of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana by students identified as “seriously emotionally disturbed.”Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 798)
17.
Mayton, D.M. (1989, April). Risk factors for substance use for rural adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Reno, NV. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 309 353)
18.
McKinney, J.D., & Feagans, L. (1984). Academic and behavioral characteristics of learning disabled children and average achievers: Longitudinal studies. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 7, 251–264.
19.
Mercer, C. (1983). Students with learning disabilites (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Moore, D., & Polsgrove, L. (1989). Disabilities, developmental handicaps, and substance misuse: A review. Social Pharmacology, 3, 375–408.
22.
Needle, R.H., Su, S.S., & Doherty, W.J. (1990). Divorce, remarriage, and adolescent substance use: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 157–169.
23.
Pandina, R.J., & Schuele, J.A. (1983). Psychosocial correlates of alcohol and drug use of adolescent students and adolescents in treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 44, 950–973.
24.
SPSS, Inc. (1986). SPSS* user's guide.Chicago: Author.
25.
Stein, J.A., Newcomb, M.D., & Bentler, P.M. (1987). An eight-year study of multiple influences on drug use and drug use consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1094–1105.
26.
Wright, P., & Santa Cruz, R. (1983). Ethnic composition of special education programs in California. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 387–394.
