de Mesquita, P. B., & Gilliam, W. S. (1994). Differential diagnosis of childhood depression: Using comorbidity and symptom overlap to generate multiple hypotheses. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 24, 157–172.
2.
Doris, J. L. (1993). Defining learning disabilities: A history in search of consensus. In R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanaugh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 97–116). Baltimore: Brookes.
3.
Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1993). Classification of learning disabilities: Relationships with other childhood disorders. In R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanaugh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 27–56). Baltimore: Brookes.
4.
Hammill, D. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84.
5.
Hammill, D. D. (1993). A brief look at the learning disabilities movement in the United States. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 295–310.
6.
Kavale, K. A., Forness, S. R., & Lorsbach, T. C. (1991). Definition for definitions of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 257–268.
7.
Keogh, B. K. (1987). Learning disabilities: In defense of a construct. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, (1), 4–9.
8.
Keogh, B. K. (1988). Learning disability: Diversity in search of order. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 225–251). New York: Pergamon.
9.
Lyon, G. R. (1994). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues.Baltimore: Brookes.
10.
Lyon, G. R., & Flynn, J. M. (1991). Assessing subtypes of learning abilities. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 59–74). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
11.
Lyon, G. R., Gray, D., Kavanaugh, J., & Krasnegor, N. (1993). Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies.Baltimore: Brookes.
12.
MacMillan, D. L. (1993). Development of operational definitions in mental retardation: Similarities and differences with the field of learning disabilities. In R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanaugh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 117–152). Baltimore: Brookes.
13.
Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 282–294.
14.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1994). Learning disabilities: Issues on definition. In Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities (pp. 61–66). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
15.
Silver, L. (1988). A review of the federal government's interagency committee on learning disabilities: Report to the U.S. Congress. LD Focus, 3, 73–81.
16.
Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Conceptual and empirical problems with discrepancy definitions of reading disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 269–282.
17.
Swanson, H. L. (1991). Operational definitions and learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 242–256.
18.
USDOE. (1994). Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act.Washington, DC: Author.