This study reports on the cost benefits of an intensive treatment program for unmanageable juvenile delinquent boys, compared to the usual treatment in a secured juvenile corrections facility. A total of 101 boys who received the majority of their treatment services in a specialized program providing intensive mental health treatment were matched to a group of 101 juveniles who received treatment as usual (TAU) in a secured juvenile corrections setting on the basis of treatment propensity scores. Outcome data included the number and type of criminally charged offenses over an average follow-up period of 53 months (range 14 to 92 months). Borrowing from Cohen criminal justice processing costs for each offense was calculated in 2001 dollars. The initial costs of the program were offset by improved treatment progress and lowered recidivism, especially violent recidivism. The treatment group yielded a benefit-cost ratio of more than 7 to 1 over the TAU group. The results are discussed and compared to cost-benefit analyses of other juvenile treatment programs.
American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.
2.
Andrews, D. A. and J. Bonta. 1995. Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto: Multihealth Systems.
3.
Aos, S.2004. Washington State's Family Integrated Transitions Program for Juvenile Offenders: Outcome Evaluation and Benefit-Cost Analysis. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
4.
Aos, S., P. Phipps, R. Barnoski, and R. Lieb. 2001. The Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs to Reduce Crime: Version 4.0. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
5.
Caldwell, M.1994. “Applying Social Constructionism in the Treatment of Patients Who Are Intractably Aggressive”. Hospital and Community Psychiatry45:6-7.
6.
Caldwell, M. and G. Van Rybroek. 2001. “Efficacy of a Decompression Treatment Model in the Clinical Management of Violent Juvenile Offenders.”International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology45 (4): 469-477.
7.
Caldwell, M. and G. Van Rybroek. 2002, April. Efficacy of the Decompression Model in the Treatment of Persistently Violent Juvenile Offenders. Paper presented at the Biannual Meeting of the American Psychology–Law Society, Austin, Texas.
8.
Caldwell, M. and G. Van Rybroek. In press. “ReducingViolence in Serious andViolent Juvenile Offenders Using an Intensive Treatment Program.”International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.
9.
Cohen, M. A.1988. “Pain, Suffering, and JuryAwards: AStudy of the Cost of Crime toVictims.” Law and Society Review22 (3): 537-555.
10.
Cohen, M. A.1998. “The Monetary Value of Saving a High-Risk Youth.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology14:5-56.
11.
Cohen, M. A., T. Miller, and S. Rossman. 1994. “The Costs and Consequences of Violent Behavior in the United States.” Pp. 216-315 in Understanding and Preventing Violence, Volume 4: Consequences and Control, edited by A. J. Reiss, Jr. and J. A. Roth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.
Dehejia, R. and S. Wahba. 1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.”Journal of the American Statistical Association94: 1053-1062.
13.
Dehejia, R. and S. Wahba. 2002. “Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies.”Review of Economics and Statistics84 (1): 151-161.
14.
Drake, C.1993. “Effects of Misspecification of the Propensity Score on Estimators of Treatment Effect.”Biometrics49:1231–1236.
15.
Edens, J. F., J. L. Skeem, K. R. Cruise, and E. Cauffman. 2001. “Assessment of ‘Juvenile Psychopathy’ and Its Association with Violence: A Critical Review.”Behavioral Sciences and the Law19:53-80.
16.
Farrington, D., A. Petrosino, and B. Welsh. 2001. “Systematic Reviews and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Correctional Interventions.”The Prison Journal81 (3): 339-359.
17.
Fass, S. and C. Pi. 2002. “Getting Tough on Juvenile Crime: An Analysis of Costs and Benefits.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency39 (4): 363-399.
18.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1996. Uniform Crime Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
19.
Fellner, J.2000. “Out of Sight: Super-Maximum Security Confinement in the United States.”Human Rights Watch12 (1). Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.hrw.org/reports/2000/supermax/index.htm
20.
Forth, A. E. and H. C. Burke. 1998. “Psychopathy in Adolescence: Assessment, Violence, and Developmental Precursors.” Pp. 205-229 in Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society, edited by D. J. Cooke, A. D. Forth, and R. D. Hare. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
21.
Forth, A. E., D. Kosson, and R. D. Hare. 2003. Psychopathy Checklist–Youth Version. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.
22.
Goldstein, A. P., B. Glick, S. Reiner, D. Zimmerman, and T. Coultry. 1986. Aggression Replacement Training. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
23.
Gottfredson, D. C.2001. Schools and Delinquency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Gottfredson, M. and T. Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Gretton, H., R. Hare, and R. Catchpole. 2004. “Psychopathy and Offending from Adolescent to Adulthood: A 10-Year Follow-Up.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology72: 636-645.
26.
Gu, X. and P. Rosenbaum. 1993. “Comparison of Multivariate Matching Methods: Structures, Distances, and Algorithms.”Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics2:405-420.
27.
Hamparian, D., R. Shuster, J. Davis, and J. White. 1985. The Young Criminal Years of the Violent Few. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
28.
Hirschi, T.1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Howell, J. and S. Bilchick. Eds. 1995. Guide for Implementing the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Chronic, and Violent Juvenile Offenders. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
Imai, K.2002. The Importance of Statistical Methodology for Analyzing Data from Field Experimentation: Evaluating Voter Mobilization Strategies. Technical Report. Oxford: Harvard University Press.
31.
Lipsey, M., and D. Wilson. 1998. “Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders: ASynthesis of Research.” Pp. 313-345 in Serious& Violent Juvenile Offenders, edited by R. Loeber and D. Farrington. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Lipsey, M., D. Wilson, and L. Cothern. 2000. “Effective Intervention for Serious Juvenile Offenders.”Juvenile Justice Bulletin, April 2000. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
33.
Martinson, R.1974, spring. “WhatWorks? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform.”The Public Interest35:22-54.
34.
McCord, J. and R. Tremblay. 1992. The Prevention of Antisocial Behavior in Children. New York: Guilford.
35.
McDougall, C., M. Cohen, R. Swaray, and A. Perry. 2003. “The Costs and Benefits of Sentencing: ASystematic Review.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science587:160-177.
36.
Miller, T., D. Fisher, and M. Cohen. 2001. “Costs of Juvenile Violence: Policy Implications.”Pediatrics107(1). Retrieved February 16, 2004, from Electronic Abstracts: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/1/e3
37.
Moffitt, T. A.1993. “Adolescent-Limited and Life-Course-Persistent Antisocial Behavior, a Developmental Taxonomy.”Psychological Review100 (4): 674-701.
38.
Moffitt, T. A. and A. Caspi. 2001. “Childhood Predictors Differentiate Life-Course Persistent and Adolescent-Limited Antisocial Pathways among Males and Female.”Development and Psychopathology13:355-375.
39.
Moffitt, T. A., A. Caspi, H. Harrington, and B. Milne. 2002. “Males on the Life-Course Persistent and Adolescent-Limited Pathways: Follow–up at Age 26 Years.”Development and Psychopathology14:179–207.
40.
Monroe, C. M., G. J. Van Rybroek, and G. J. Maier. 1988. “Decompressing Aggressive Inpatients: Breaking the Aggression Cycle to Enhance Positive Outcome.”Behavioral Sciences and the Law6:543-557.
41.
Ogloff, J. P. R. and D. R. Lyon. 1998. “Legal Issues AssociatedWith the Concept of Psychopathy. Pp. 401-422 in Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society, edited by D.J. Cooke, A. D. Forth, and R. D. Hare. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
42.
Robertson, A., P. Grimes, and K. Rogers. 2001. “A Short-Run Cost-Benefit Analysis of Community-Based Interventions for Juvenile Offenders.”Crime and Delinquency47:265-284.
43.
Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.”Biometrika70:41-55.
44.
Sherman, L. W.1993. “Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction.”Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency30 (4): 445-474.
45.
Sherman, L. W., D. A. Smith, J. D. Schmidt, and D. P. Rogan. 1992. “Crime, Punishment and Stake in Conformity: Legal and Informal Controls of Domestic Violence.”American Sociological Review57 (5): 680-690.
46.
Tate, D., D. Reppucci, and E. Mulvey. 1995. “Violent Juvenile Delinquents: Treatment Effectiveness and Implications for Future Action.”American Psychologist50 (9): 777-781.
47.
Thornberry, T., A. Lizotte, M. Krohn, M. Farnsworth, and S. Jang. 1991. “Testing Interactional Theory: An Examination of Reciprocal Causal Relationships Among Family, School, and Delinquency.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology82:3–35.
48.
Wechsler, D.1991. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
49.
Welsh, B. and D. Farrington. 2000. “Correctional Intervention Programs and Cost-Benefit Analysis.”Criminal Justice and Behavior27 (1): 115-133.
50.
Wolford, B. and L. Koebel. 1995.“Kentucky Model forYouths at Risk.”Criminal Justice9:5-55.
51.
Yates, B. T.1985. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Cost-benefit Analysis: An Introduction.”Behavioral Assessment7:207-234.
52.
Yates, B. T.1994. “Toward the Incorporation of Costs, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, and Costbenefit Analysis into Clinical Research.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology62 (4): 729-736.
