Routine activity theory predicts that changes in legitimate opportunity structures (e.g., technology) can increase the convergence of motivated offenders and suitable targets in the absence of capable guardianship. The Internet has fundamentally changed consumer practices and has simultaneously expanded opportunities for cyber-fraudsters to target online consumers. The authors draw on routine activity theory and consumer behavior research to understand how personal characteristics and online routines increase people’s exposure to motivated offenders. Using a representative sample of 922 adults from a statewide survey in Florida, the results of the regression models are consistent with prior research in that sociodemographic characteristics shape routine online activity (e.g., spending time online and making online purchases). Furthermore, indicators of routine online activity fully mediate the effect of sociodemographic characteristics on the likelihood of being targeted for fraud online. These findings support the routine activity perspective and provide a theoretically informed direction for situational crime prevention in a largely unexplored consumer context.
American Association for Public Opinion Research.2004. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
2.
Anderson, Keith B.2004. Consumer Fraud in the United States: An FTC Survey . Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
3.
Belknap, Joanne.1987. ‘‘Routine Activity Theory and the Risk of Rape: Analyzing Ten Years of National Crime Survey Data. ’’ Criminal Justice Policy Review2:337-56.
4.
Belsley, David A., Edwin Kuh, and Roy E. Welsch .1980. Regression Diagnostics . New York: John Wiley.
5.
Berg, Sara.2008. ‘‘Preventing Identity Theft through Information Technology.’’ Pp. 151-67 in Perspectives on Identity Theft, edited by M. M. McNally and G. R. Newman.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
6.
Bhatnagar, Amit, Sanjog Misra, and H. Raghav Rao .2000. ‘‘On Risk, Convenience, and Internet Shopping Behavior: Why Some Consumers Are Online Shoppers While Others Are Not.’’Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery33:98-105.
7.
Budd, Tracey.1999. Burglary of Domestic Dwellings: Findings from the British Crime Survey. London: Home Office Statistical Bulletin.
8.
Burns, Ronald G., Keith H. Whitworth, and Carol Y. Thompson .2004. ‘‘Assessing Law Enforcement Preparedness to Address Internet Fraud.’’Journal of Criminal Justice32:477-93.
9.
Chang, Joshua and Nicholas Samuel.2004. ‘‘Internet Shopper Demographics and Buying Behavior in Australia.’’ Journal of American Academy of Business5:171-76.
10.
Clarke, Ronald V.1995. ‘‘Situational Crime Prevention.’’ Pp. 91-150 in Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention , edited by M. Tonry and D. P. Farrington.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Clarke, Ronald V.1997. Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies . 2nd ed. Albany, NY: Harrow & Heston.
12.
Clarke, Ronald V.1999. Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating, and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods (Police Research Series, Paper 112). London: Home Office.
13.
Clarke, Ronald V. and David Weisburd.1994. ‘‘Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits: Observations on the Reverse of Displacement.’’ Pp. 165-83 in Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 2, edited by R. V. Clarke.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
14.
Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson.1979. ‘‘Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.’’American Sociological Review52:170-83.
15.
Cohen, Lawrence E., Marcus Felson, and Kenneth C. Land .1980. ‘‘Property Crime Rates in the United States: A Macrodynamic Analysis, 1947-1977, with Ex Ante Forecasts for the Mid-1980s.’’American Journal of Sociology86:90-117.
16.
Cohen, Lawrence E., James R. Kluegel, and Kenneth C. Land .1981. ‘‘Social Inequality and Predatory Criminal Victimization: An Exposition and Test of a Formal Theory.’’American Sociological Review46:505-24.
17.
Copes, Heath and Lynne Vieraitis.2008. ‘‘The Risks, Rewards, and Strategies of Stealing Identities.’’ Pp. 87-110 in Perspectives on Identity Theft. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 23, edited by M. McNally and G. R. Newman.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
18.
Criminal Law Reporter.2006. ‘‘More Americans Fear Cybercrime than Physical Crime, According to IBM Study.’’ Criminal Law Reporter78:725.
19.
Curtin, Richard, Stanley Presser, and Eleanor Singer.2005. ‘‘Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century.’’ Public Opinion Quarterly69:87-98.
20.
Day, Jennifer C., Alex Janus, and Jessica Davis.2005. Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
21.
Dugan, Laura and Robert Apel.2005. ‘‘The Differential Risk of Retaliation by Relational Distance: A More General Model of Violent Victimization. ’’ Criminology43:697-728.
22.
Dugan, Laura, Daniel S. Nagin, and Richard Rosenfeld .2003. ‘‘Exposure Reduction or Retaliation? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate-Partner Homicide.’’Law and Society Review37:169-98.
23.
Eck, John E. and David Weisburd.1995. ‘‘Crime Places in Crime Theory.’’ Pp. 1-33 in Crime and Place, Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 4, edited by J. E. Eck and D. Weisburd.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
24.
Fallows, Deborah.2005. How Women and Men Use the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project .
25.
Farag, Sendg, Jesse Weltevreden, Ton Van Rietbergen, Marty Dijst, and Frank Van Ort .2006. ‘‘E-Shopping in the Netherlands: Does Geography Matter?’’ Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design33:59-74.
26.
Fattah, Ezzat.1993. ‘‘The Rational Choice/Opportunity Perspectives as a Vehicle for Integrating Criminological and Victimological Theories.’’ Pp. 225-58 in Routine Activity and Rational Choice, edited by R. Clarke and M. Felson.New York: Transaction.
27.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.2001. Press release: Internet fraud investigation ‘‘operation cyber loss.’’ Retrieved http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/ifcc052301.htm.
28.
Federal Trade Commission.2006. Consumer Fraud and Identity Theft Complaint Data. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Felson, Marcus.1986. ‘‘Linking Criminal Choices, Routine Activities, Informal Social Control, and Criminal Outcomes.’’ Pp. 119-28 in The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspective on Offending, edited by D. B. Cornish and R. V. Clarke.New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
30.
Ferraro, Monique Mattei, Eoghan Casey, and Michael McGrath .2004. Investigating Child Exploitation and Pornography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
Finkelhor, David, Kimberly J. Mitchell, and Janis Wolak.2000. Online Victimization: A Report on the Nation’s Youth. Washington DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
32.
Fletcher, Nigel.2007. ‘‘Challenges for Regulating Fraud in Cyberspace .’’ Journal of Financial Crime14:190-207.
33.
Fox, John.1991. Regression Diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Gardner, William, Edward Mulvey, and Esther Shaw.1995. ‘‘Regression Analysis of Counts and Rates: Poisson, Overdispersed Poisson, and Negative Binomial Models .’’ Psychological Bulletin118:392-404.
35.
Gelber, Alexandra.2006. ‘‘Federal Jurisdiction in Child Pornography Cases.’’ United States Attorney’s Bulletin54(7):3-7.
36.
Gmel, Gerhard.2001. ‘‘Imputation of Missing Values in the Case of Multiple Item Instrument Measuring Alcohol Consumption. ’’ Statistics in Medicine20:2369-81.
37.
Gottfredson, Michael R.1981. ‘‘On the Etiology of Criminal Victimization.’’Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology72:714-26.
38.
Grabowsky, Peter N. and Russell G. Smith.1998. Crime in the Digital Age: Controlling Telecommunications and Cyberspace Illegalities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
39.
Grazioli, Stefano and Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa.2001. ‘‘Deceived: Under Target Online.’’Communications of the ACM46:196-205.
40.
Hanushek, Eric A. and John E. Jackson.1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists . San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
41.
Harris Poll.2005. ‘‘Almost Three-Quarters of All American Adults Go Online. Harris Interactive Poll.’’ Retrieved March5, 2010 (http://www.harrisinteractive. com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=569).
42.
Hesseling, René B. P.1995. ‘‘Displacement: A Review of the Literature.’’ Pp. 197-230 in Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 3, edited by R. V. Clarke.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
43.
Hindelang, Michael J., Michael R. Gottfredson, and James Garafolo.1978. Victims of Personal Crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
44.
Holtfreter, Kristy, Michael D. Reisig, and Thomas G. Blomberg .2006. ‘‘Consumer Fraud Victimization in Florida: An Empirical Study.’’St. Thomas Law Review18:761-89.
45.
Holtfreter, Kristy, Michael D. Reisig, and Travis C. Pratt .2008. ‘‘Low Self-control, Routine Activities, and Fraud Victimization.’’Criminology46:189-220.
46.
Holtfreter, Kristy, Michael D. Reisig, Nicole Leeper Piquero, and Alex R. Piquero .2010. ‘‘Low Self-Control and Fraud: Offending, Victimization, and Their Overlap.’’Criminal Justice and Behavior37:188-203.
47.
Horrigan, John B. ( 2008). Online Shopping. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
48.
Internet Crime Complaint Center.2006. Internet Crime Report. Washington, DC: The National White Collar Crime Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation .
49.
Jensen, Gary F. and David Brownfield.1986. ‘‘Gender, Lifestyles, and Victimization: Beyond Routine Activity.’’Violence and Victims1:85-99.
50.
Johnson, Shane D., Wim Bernasco, Kate Bowers, Henk Elffers, Jerry Ratcliffe, George Rengert, and Michael Townsley .2007. ‘‘Space-time Patterns of Risk: A Cross-national Assessment of Residential Burglary Victimization.’’Journal of Quantitative Criminology23:201-19.
51.
Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom.1996. PRELIS 2: User’s Reference Guide . Chicago: Scientific Software International .
52.
Keeter, Scott, Courtney Kennedy, April Clark, Trevor Tompson, and Mike Mokrzycki.2007. ‘‘What’s Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys? The Impact of the Growing Cell-only Population.’’Public Opinion Quarterly71:772-92.
53.
Kennedy, Leslie W. and David R. Forde.1990. ‘‘Routine Activities and Crime: An Analysis of Victimization in Canada.’’Criminology28:137-52.
54.
Korgaonkar, Pradeep K. and Lori D. Wolin.1999. ‘‘A Multivariate Analysis of Web Usage.’’Journal of Advertising Research39:53-68.
55.
Korgaonkar, Pradeep and Lori D. Wolin.2002. ‘‘Web Usage, Advertising, and Shopping: Relationship Patterns.’’Internet Research12:191-204.
56.
Land, Kenneth C., Patricia McCall, and Daniel S. Nagin .1996. ‘‘A Comparison of Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Semiparametric Mixed Poisson Regression Models.’’ Sociological Methods and Research24:387-442.
57.
Langenderfer, Jeff and Terrance A. Shimp.2001. ‘‘Consumer Vulnerability to Scams, Swindles, and Fraud: A New Theory of Visceral Influences on Persuasion.’’Psychology and Marketing18:763-83.
58.
Lauritsen, Janet L.2001. ‘‘The Social Ecology of Violent Victimization: Individual and Contextual Effects in the NCVS.’’Journal of Quantitative Criminology17:3-32.
59.
Levi, Michael.1998. ‘‘Organizing Plastic Fraud: Enterprise Criminals and the Sidestepping of Fraud Prevention.’’ The Howard Journal37:423-38.
60.
Levi, Michael and David S. Wall.2004. ‘‘Technologies, Security, and Privacy in the Post-9/11 European Information Society.’’Journal of Law and Society31: 194-220.
61.
Licht, Mark H.1995. ‘‘Multiple Regression and Correlation.’’ Pp. 19-64 in Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, edited by L. Grimm and P. Yarnold.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
62.
Lin, Carolyn A.2006. ‘‘Interactive Media Technology and Electronic Shopping.’’ Pp. 203-22 in Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications, edited by C. A. Lin and D. J. Atkin.New York: Routledge.
63.
Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese.2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
64.
McCarty, Christopher, Mark House, Jeffrey Harman, and Scott Richards.2006. ‘‘Effort in Phone Survey Response Rates: The Effects of Vendor and Client-controlled Factors.’’Field Methods18:172-88.
65.
McNally, Megan M. and Graeme R. Newman.2008. Perspectives on Identity Theft. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 23. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
66.
Messner, Steven F. and Kenneth Tardiff.1987. ‘‘The Social Ecology of Urban Homicide: An Application of the ‘Routine Activities’ Approach.’’Criminology23:241-67.
67.
Miethe, Terance and Robert F. Meier.1994. Crime and Its Social Context: Toward and Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
68.
Mitchell, Kimberly J. and David Finkelhor.2001. ‘‘Risk of Crime Victimization Among Youth Exposed to Domestic Violence.’’Journal of Interpersonal Violence16:944-64.
69.
Moore, Elizabeth and Michael Mills.1990. ‘‘The Neglected Victims and Unexamined Costs of White-collar Crime.’’ Crime and Delinquency36:408-18.
70.
Newman, Graeme R.2008. ‘‘Identity Theft and Opportunity.’’ Pp. 9-31 in Perspectives on Identity Theft. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 23 , edited by M. M. McNally and G. R. Newman.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
71.
Newman, Graeme R. and Ronald V. Clarke.2003. Superhighway Robbery: Preventing E-Commerce Crime . Devon, UK: Willan Publishing .
72.
Nielsen Online.2008. Nielsen Online Reports Topline U.S. data for March 2008. New York : Nielsen Company.
73.
Parks Associates.2008. Only One in Five Households Has Never Used E-Mail. Dallas, TX : Parks Associates.
74.
Pew Research Center.2004. Survey Experiment Shows Polls Face Growing Resistance, but Still Representative. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
75.
Piquero, Alex R., John MacDonald, Adam Dobrin, Leah E. Daigle, and Francis T. Cullen .2005. ‘‘Self-control, Violent Offending, and Homicide Victimization: Assessing the General Theory of Crime.’’Journal of Quantitative Criminology21:55-71.
76.
Pontell, Henry N., Gregory C. Brown, and Anastasia Tosouni .2008. ‘‘Stolen Identities: A Victim Survey.’’ Pp. 57-85 in Perspectives on Identity Theft. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 23, edited by M. M. McNally and G. R. Newman.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
77.
Pratt, Travis C.2009. Addicted to Incarceration: Corrections Policy and the Politics of Misinformation in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Pratt, Travis C. and Francis T. Cullen.2005. ‘‘Assessing Macro-level Predictors and Theories of Crime: A Meta-analysis.’’Crime and Justice: A Review of Research32:373-450.
79.
Ratchford, Brian T., Debabrata Talukadar, and Myung-Soo Lee .2001. ‘‘A Model of Consumer Choice of the Internet as an Information Source.’’International Journal of Electronic Commerce5:7-21.
80.
Reisig, Michael D., Travis C. Pratt, and Kristy Holtfreter .2009. ‘‘Perceived Risk of Internet Theft Victimization: Examining the Effects of Social Vulnerability and Impulsivity.’’Criminal Justice & Behavior36:369-84.
81.
Rodgers, Karen and Georgia Roberts.1995. ‘‘Women’s Non-spousal Multiple Victimization: A Test of the Routine Activities Theory.’’ Canadian Journal of Criminology37:363-91.
82.
Sampson, Robert J.1987. ‘‘Personal Violence by Strangers: An Extension and Test of the Opportunity Model of Predatory Victimization.’’Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology78:327-56.
83.
Sampson, Robert J. and Janet L. Lauritsen.1990. ‘‘Deviant Lifestyles, Proximity to Crime, and the Offender-Victim Link in Personal Violence.’’Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency27:110-39.
84.
Sampson, Robert J. and John D. Wooldredge.1987. ‘‘Linking the Micro- and Macro-level Dimensions of Lifestyle-Routine Activity and Opportunity Models of Predatory Victimization.’’Journal of Quantitative Criminology3:371-93.
85.
Schreck, Christopher J. and Bonnie S. Fisher.2004. ‘‘Specifying the Influence of Family and Peers on Violent Victimization: Extending Routine Activities and Lifestyles Theories.’’Journal of Interpersonal Violence19:1021-41.
86.
Schreck, Christopher J., Eric A. Stewart, and Bonnie S. Fisher .2006. ‘‘Self-control, Victimization, and the Influence on Risky Lifestyles: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Panel Data.’’Journal of Quantitative Criminology22:319-40.
87.
Schreck, Christopher J., Richard A. Wright, and J. Mitchell Miller .2002. ‘‘A Study of Individual and Situational Antecedents of Violent Victimization.’’Justice Quarterly19:159-80.
88.
Shover, Neal, Glenn S. Coffey, and Dick Hobbs.2003. ‘‘Crime on the Line: Telemarketing Fraud and the Changing Nature of Professional Crime.’’British Journal of Criminology43:489-505.
89.
Shover, Neal, Glenn S. Coffey, and Clinton R. Sanders .2004. ‘‘Dialing for Dollars: Opportunities, Justifications, and Telemarketing Fraud.’’Qualitative Sociology27:59-75.
90.
Soopramanien, Didier and Alastair Robertson.2007. ‘‘Adoption and Usage of Online Shopping: An Empirical Analysis of the Characteristics of ‘Buyers,’ ‘Browsers’ and ‘Non-Internet shoppers.’’’ Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services14:73-82.
91.
Sorce, Patricia, Victor Perotti, and Stanley Widrick .2005. ‘‘Attitude and Age Differences in Online Buying.’’ International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management33:122-32.
92.
Stewart, Eric A., Kirk W. Elifson, and Claire E. Sterk .2004. ‘‘Integrating the General Theory of Crime into an Explanation of Violent Victimization among Female Offenders.’’Justice Quarterly21:159-81.
93.
Stranahan, Harriet and Dorota Kosiel.2007. ‘‘E-Tail Spending Patterns and the Importance of Online Store Familiarity.’’ Internet Research4:421-34.
94.
Swinyard, William R. and Scott Smith.2003. ‘‘Why People (Don’t) Shop Online: A Lifestyle Study of the Internet Consumer.’’Psychology and Marketing20: 567-97.
95.
Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Linda S. Fidell.2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
96.
Titus, Richard.2001. ‘‘Personal Fraud and Its Victims.’’ Pp. 57-74 in Crimes of Privilege: Readings in White-Collar Crime, edited by N. Shover and J. P. Wright.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
97.
Titus, Richard, Fred Heinzelmann, and John Boyle.1995. ‘‘Victimization of Persons by Fraud.’’ Crime and Delinquency41:54-72.
98.
U.S. Census Bureau.2008. Projected Online Retail Sales. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division.
99.
U.S. Department of Commerce.2008. U.S. Census Bureau News: Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales, 4th Quarter 2007 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
100.
U.S. Department of Justice.2008. Crime in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
101.
Waksberg, Joseph.1978. ‘‘Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialing .’’ Journal of the American Statistical Association73:40-6.
102.
Wall, David S.2005. ‘‘The Internet as a Conduit for Criminals.’’ Pp. 77-98 in Information Technology and the Criminal Justice System, edited by A. Pattavina . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
103.
Wall, David S.2007a. Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
104.
Wall, David S.2007b. ‘‘Policing Cybercrimes: Situating the Public Police in Networks of Security within Cyberspace.’’Police Practice and Research8:183-205.
105.
Weisberg, Herbert, John Krosnick, and Bruce Bowen.1989. An Introduction to Survey Research and Data Analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
106.
Weisburd, David, Laura A. Wyckoff, Justin Ready, John E. Eck, Joshua C. Hinkle, and Frank Gajweski.2006. ‘‘Does Crime Just Move Around the Corner? A Controlled Study of Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits.’’Criminology44:549-92.
107.
Willison, Robert.2008. ‘‘Applying Situational Crime Prevention to the Information Systems Security Context.’’ Pp. 169-92 in Perspectives on Identity Theft. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 23, edited by M. M. McNally and G. R. Newman.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
108.
Wilson, Debbie, Alison Patterson, Gemma Powell, and Rachelle Hembury .2006. ‘‘Fraud and Technology Crimes: Findings from the 2003/04 British Crime Survey, the 2004 Offending, Crime and Justice Survey and Administrative Sources. Online Report 9/06.’’London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office. Retrieved March 5, 2010 (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/offending_survey.html ).
109.
Wortley, Richard and Stephen Smallbone.2006. ‘‘Applying Situational Principles to Sexual Offenses against Children.’’ Pp. 7-35 in Situational Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 19, edited by R. Wortley and S. Smallbone.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
110.
Yar, Majid.2006. Cybercrime and Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
