Using a sample of sex offenders in the state of Washington, the current study examines the nature and magnitude of disparities in notification decisions among distinct groups of sex offenders. The method of conjunctive analysis is used to describe the extent to which similar types of sex offenders (i.e., groups of sex offenders that share similar sets of risk factors for re-offending) are treated similarly in notification decisions. The observed patterns of widespread disparities in these decisions among distinct composite profiles of sex offenders are then discussed in terms of their implications for future research on evaluating disparity in criminal processing, the collateral consequences of notification decisions, and ongoing public policy on the control and management of sex offenders.
Adams, Devon B.2002. Summary of States Sex Offender Registries, 2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 192265. Washington DC: Office of Justice Programs.
2.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. 2006. H.R. 4472, 109th Congress.
3.
Adkins, Geneva, David Huff, and Paul Stageberg.2000. The Iowa Sex Offender Registry and Recidivism . Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning and Statistical Analysis Center.
4.
Anderson, Amy L. and Lisa L. Sample.2008. ‘‘Public Awareness and Action Resulting From Sex Offender Community Notification laws.’’Criminal Justice Policy Review19:371-96.
5.
Barbaree, Howard E., Michael C. Seto, Calvin M. Langston, and Edward Peacock.2001. ‘‘Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Six Risk Assessment Instruments for Adult Sex Offenders.’’Criminal Justice and Behavior28:490-521.
6.
Barnoski, Robert.2005a. Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Has Community Notification Reduced Recidivism?Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Document No. 05-12-1202.
7.
Barnoski, Robert.2005b. Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Notification Levels and Recidivism. Document No. 05-12-1203. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
8.
Barnoski, Robert.2006a. Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Predicting Recidivism Based on Demographics and Criminal History. Document No. 06-01-1207. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
9.
Barnoski, Robert.2006b. Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Sex Offender Risk Level Classification Tool and Recidivism. Document No. 06-01-1204. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
10.
Cohen, Michelle and Elizabeth L. Jeglic.2007. ‘‘Sex Offender Legislation in the United States: What Do We Know?’’International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology51:369-83.
11.
Drake, Elizabeth and Robert Barnoski.2006. Sex Offenders in Washington State: Key Findings and Trends . Document No. 06-03-1201. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
12.
Duwe, Grant and William Donnay.2008. ‘‘The Impact of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Recidivism: The Minnesota Experience.’’ Criminology46: 411-46.
13.
Edwards, William and Christopher Hensley.2001. ‘‘Contextualizing Sex Offender Management Legislation and Policy: Evaluating the Problem of Latent Consequences in Community Notification Laws.’’ International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology45:83-101.
14.
Elbogen, Eric B., Marc Patry, and Mario J. Scalora .2003. ‘‘The Impact of Community Notification Laws on Sex Offender Treatment Attitudes.’’International Journal of Law and Psychiatry26:207-19.
15.
Farkas, Mary Ann and Amy Stichman .2002. ‘‘Sex Offender Laws: Can Treatment, Punishment, Incapacitation, and Public Safety be Reconciled?’’Criminal Justice Review27:256-83.
16.
Finn, Peter.1997. Sex Offender Community Notification. NIJ Research in Action. February 1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
17.
Freeman, Naomi J. and Jeffrey C. Sandler.2009. ‘‘The Adam Walsh Act: A False Sense of Security or an Effective Public Policy Initiative?’’Criminal Justice Policy Review, Online First DOI:10.1177/0887403409338565. Retrieved August 1, 2009 (Also available at http://cjp.sagepub.com.)
18.
Freeman-Longo, R.E.1996. ‘‘Feel Good Legislation: Prevention or Calamity .’’ Child Abuse & Neglect20:95-101.
19.
Hanson, R. Karl.1997. The Development of a Brief Actuarial Risk Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism. Public Works and Government Services Canada. ISBN: 0-662-26207-7.
20.
Hanson, R. Karl and Andrew J.R. Harris.2000. ‘‘When Should We Intervene? Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Offense Recidivism.’’Criminal Justice and Behavior27:6-35.
21.
Hanson, R. Karl and Kelley Morton-Bourgon.2004. Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: An Updated Meta-Analysis . Public Works and Government Services Canada. ISBN: 0-662-36397-3.
22.
Hanson, R. Karl and Kelley Morton-Bourgon.2005. ‘‘The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-analysis of Recidivism Studies.’’Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology73:1154-63.
23.
Hanson, R. Karl and Kelley Morton-Bourgon.2007. The Accuracy of Recidivism Risk Assessments for Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis. Public Works and Government Services Canada. ISBN: 978-0-662-45166-2.
24.
Hanson, R. Karl and Monique T. Bussière.1998. ‘‘Predicting Relapse: A Meta-analysis of Sexual Offender Recidivism Studies.’’Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology66:348-62.
25.
Hart, Timothy C. and Terance D. Miethe.2008. ‘‘Exploring Bystander Presence and Intervention in Nonfatal Violent Victimization: When Does Helping Really Help.’’Violence and Victims23:637-51.
26.
Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act. 1994. H.R. 3355, 103rd Congress.
27.
Langton, Calvin M., Howard E. Barbaree, Kevin T. Hansen, Leigh Harkins, and Edward Peacock.2007. ‘‘Reliability and Validity of the STATIC-2002 Among Adult Sexual Offenders with Reference to Treatment Status.’’Criminal Justice and Behavior34:616-40.
28.
Levenson, Jill S.2003. ‘‘Policy Interventions Designed to Combat Sexual Violence: Community Notification and Civil Commitment.’’Journal of Child Sexual Abuse12:17-52.
29.
Levenson, Jill S.2008. ‘‘Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Residence Restrictions.’’Criminal Justice Studies21:153-66.
30.
Levenson, Jill S. and Andrea L. Hern.2007. ‘‘Sex Offender Residence Restrictions: Unintended Consequences and Community Reentry.’’Justice Research and Policy9:59-74.
31.
Levenson, Jill S. and David A. D’Amora.2007. ‘‘Social Policies Designed to Prevent Sexual Violence: The Emperor’s New Clothes?’’Criminal Justice Policy Review18:168-99.
32.
Levenson, Jill S., David A. D’Amora, and Andrea L. Hern.2007. ‘‘Megan’s Law and its Impact on Community Re-Entry for Sex Offenders.’’Behavioral Sciences and the Law25:587-602.
33.
Levenson, Jill S. and Leo P. Cotter.2005. ‘‘The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration.’’Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21:49-66.
34.
Levenson, Jill S., Yolanda N. Brannon, Timothy Fortney, and Juanita Baker.2007. ‘‘Public Perceptions about Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies.’’Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy7:137-61.
35.
Lieb, Roxanne, Vernon Quinsey, and Lucy Berliner.1998. ‘‘Sexual Predators and Social Policy.’’Crime and Justice23:43-114. (Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0192-3234%281998%2923%3C43%3ASPASP%3E2.0.co%3B2-R on January 28, 2008)
36.
Matson, Scott and Roxanne Lieb.1996. Community Notification in Washington State: 1996 Survey of Law Enforcement. Document No. 96-11-1101. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
37.
Matson, Scott and Roxanne Lieb.1997. Megan’s Law: A Review of State and Federal Legislation . Document No. 97-10-1101. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
38.
Megan’s Law. 1996. H.R. 2137. 104th Congress.
39.
Miethe, Terance D., Timothy Hart, and Wendy Regoeczi.2008. ‘‘The Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations: An Exploratory Method for Discrete Multivariate Analyses of Crime Data.’’Journal of Quantitative Criminology24:227-41.
40.
Miethe, Terance D. and William H. Sousa.2009. ‘‘Carjacking and Its Consequences: A Situational Analysis of Risk Factors for Differential Outcomes.’’Security Journal, 23: 241-258.
41.
Pam Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act of 1996. 1996. S. 1675. 104th Congress.
42.
Petrosino, Anthony J. and Carolyn Petrosino.1999. ‘‘The Public Safety Potential of Megan’s Law in Massachusetts: An Assessment From a Sample of Criminal Sexual Psychopaths.’’Crime and Delinquency45:140-58.
43.
Phillips, Dretha M.1998. Community Notification as Viewed by Washington’s Citizens. Document No. 98-03-1101. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
44.
Presser, Lois and Elaine Gunnison.1999. ‘‘Strange Bedfellows: Is Sex Offender Notification a Form of Community Justice?’’ Crime and Delinquency45:299-315.
45.
Quinn, James F., Craig J. Forsyth, and Carla Mullen-Quinn .2004. ‘‘Societal Reaction to Sex Offenders: A Review of The Origins and Results of the Myths Surrounding their Crimes and Treatment Amenability.’’Deviant Behavior25:215-32.
46.
Ragin, Charles C.1987. The Comparative Method. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
47.
Regoeczi, Wendy C. and Terance D. Miethe.2010. ‘‘Leading Lethal Lives? Variations in the Structure, Context, and Criminal Justice Response to Female Homicide Victimization.’’ Pp. 72-94 in Female Victims of Crime: Reality Reconsidered, edited by Venessa Garcia and Janice E. Clifford.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
Sandler, Jeffrey C., Naomi J. Freeman, and Kelly M. Socia .2008. ‘‘Does a Watched Pot Boil? A Time-Series Analysis of New York State’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law.’’Psychology, Public Policy, and Law14:284-302.
49.
Schram, Donna, D. and Cheryl D. Milloy.1995. Community Notification: A Study of Offender Characteristics and Recidivism. Document No. 95-10-1101. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. October 1995.
50.
Simon, Jonathan.1998. ‘‘Managing the Monstrous: Sex Offenders and the New Penology.’’ Psychology, Public Policy, and Law4:452-67.
51.
Tewksbury, Richard.2002. ‘‘Validity and Utility of the Kentucky Sex Offender Registry.’’ Federal Probation66:21-6.
52.
Tewksbury, Richard.2004. ‘‘Experiences and Attitudes of Registered Female Sex OffendersWestern Criminology Review71-8.’’ Federal Probation68:30-3.
53.
Tewksbury, Richard.2005. ‘‘Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration.’’ Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21:67-81.
54.
Tewksbury, Richard.2006. ‘‘Sex Offender Registeries as a Tool for Public Safety: Views from Registered Offenders.’’ . (Retrieved from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v07n1/01/sexoffender.htmlonAugust12, 2009.)
55.
Tewksbury, Richard and George E. Higgins.2005. ‘‘What Can Be Learned From an Online Sex Offender Registry Site?’’Journal of Community Corrections14:9-11, 15-6.
56.
Tewksbury, Richard and Matthew Lees.2006. ‘‘Perceptions of Sex Offender Registration: Collateral Consequences and Community Experiences.’’ Sociological Spectrum26:309-34.
57.
Tewksbury, Richard and Matthew Lees.2007. ‘‘Perceptions of Punishment: How Registered Sex Offenders View Registries.’’ Crime & Delinquency53:380-407.
58.
Vásquez, B.E., Sean Madden, and Jeffery T. Walker .2008. The Influence of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws in the United States: A Time-Series Analysis . Crime and Delinquency54:175-92.
59.
Washington Community Protection Act. 1990. § 71- RCW-71.09.
60.
Washington State Institute for Public Policy.2005. Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Recidivism Rates. Document No. 05-08-1203. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. August 26, 2005.
61.
Zevitz, Richard G. and Mary Ann Farkas.2000. ‘‘The Impact of Sex-Offender Community Notification on Probation/Parole in Wisconsin’’. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology44:8-21.
62.
Zgoba, Kristen, Philip Witt, Melissa Dalessandro, and Bonita Veysey.2008. Megan’s Law: Assessing the Practical and Monetary Efficacy [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 17, 2009 (http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/225370.pdf ).
