This article attempts to redress a critical conceptual and methodological weakness in prevailing research on bias in deviant status attainment processes by focusing explicit attention on the dynamic, sequential, and reflexive nature of processing. The argument put forth here is that while processors are oriented toward rational decision making, uncertainty is an inherent part of judgements. As a result, effective decision making requires the use of available social heuristics to make decisions possible and still rational in appearance. We suggest that one underlying heuristic is typescripting. When recent anomalies in data on bias in criminal and juvenile justice processing are viewed with a dynamic model of processing that incorporates the idea of social heuristics, they appear to make sense. We discuss some of these anomalies, present some illustrative data from a large-scale survey of juveniles, and use the model to predict some counterintuitive findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ageton, S. S.
and D. S. Elliott 1978 The Incidence of Delinquent Behavior in a National Probability Sample of Adolescents. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.
2.
Anderson, E.1976“The `chivalrous' treatment of the female offender in the arms of the criminal justice system: a review of the literature.”Social Problems23: 350-357.
3.
Armstrong, G.1977“Females under the law: `protected' but unequal.”Crime and Delinquency8: 109-120.
4.
Arnold, W. R.1971“Race and ethnicity relative to other factors in juvenile court dispositions.”Amer. J. of Sociology77: 211-227.
5.
Berk, R. A.
and S. Ray1982“Selection biases in sociological data.”Social Science Research11: 352-398.
6.
Bernstein, I. N.
, E. Kick, J. T. Leung, and B. Schultz1977“Charge reduction: an intermediary stage in the process of labelling criminal defendants.”Social Forces56: 362-384.
7.
Blumstein, A.1982“On the racial disproportionality of United States' prison population.”J. of Criminal Law and Criminology73: 1259-1281.
8.
Chesney-Lind, M.1973“Judicial enforcement of the female sex-role: the family court and the female delinquent.”Issues in Criminology8: 51-59.
9.
Chesney-Lind, M.1977“Judicial paternalism and the female status offender: training women to know their places.”Crime and Delinquency23, 2: 109-120.
10.
Cohen, L. E.
and J. R. Kluegal1979“The detention decision: a study of the impact of social characteristics and the legal factors in two metropolitan juvenile courts.”Social Forces58: 146-161.
11.
Conway, A.
and L. Bogdan1977“Sexual delinquency: a persistence of a double standard.”Crime and Delinquency8: 131-135.
12.
Dannefer, D.
and R. K. Schutt1982“Race and juvenile justice processing in court and police agencies.”Amer. J. of Sociology87: 1113-1132.
13.
Elliott, D. S.
and S. S. Ageton1980“Reconciling race and class differences in self-reported and official estimates of delinquency.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 95-110.
14.
Empey, L. T.
1982 American Delinquency: Its Meaning and Construction. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
15.
Gove, W. R.
1975 The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective. New York: Wiley.
16.
Harris, A. R.1977“Sex and theories of deviance: toward a functional theory of deviant typescripts.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 3-16.
17.
Harris, A. R.
and G. D. Hill1982“The social psychology of deviance: toward a reconciliation with social structure.”Annual Rev. of Sociology8: 161-186.
18.
Harris, A. R.
and G. D. Hill 1984 “Bias in status processing decisions.” In A. R. Harris (ed.) Rationality and Collective Belief: Advances in Social Psychology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
Hindelang, M.1978“Race and involvement in common law personal crimes.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 93-109.
20.
Hindelang, M. J.
, T. Hirschi, and J. G. Weis 1981 Measuring Delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Hughes, E. C.1945“Dilemmas and contradictions of status.”Amer. J. of Sociology50: 353-359.
22.
Kleck, G.1981“Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: a critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty.”Amer. Soc. Rev.46: 783-805.
23.
Landes, W. M.1971“An economic analysis of the courts.”Journals of Law and Economics12: 61-107.
24.
Manders, D.1975“Labelling theory and social reality: a Marxist critique.”Insurgent Sociologist6: 51-60.
25.
Rubington, E.
and M. S. Weinberg 1981 Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective. New York: Macmillan.
26.
Spector, M.1975“Labelling theory in Social Problems: a journal launches a new theory.”Social Problems24: 69-75.
27.
Thomson, R. J.
and M. T. Zingraff1981“Detecting sentencing disparity: some problems and evidence.”Amer. J. of Sociology86: 768-880.
28.
Tudor, J. F.
and W. R. Gove1977“The effects of sex role differences on the social control of mental illness.”J. of Health and Social Behavior18: 98-112.
29.
Tudor, W.
, J. F. Tudor, and W. R. Gove1979“The effect of sex role differences on the societal reaction to mental retardation.”Social Forces57: 871-886.
30.
Wells, E. L.1978“Theories of deviance and the self-concept.”Social Psychology41: 189-204.
31.
Wheeler, S.
, D. Weisburg, and N. Bede1982“Sentencing the white-collar offender: rhetoric and reality.”Amer. Soc. Rev.47: 641-659.
32.
Wilson, J. Q.
1968 “The police and the delinquent in two cities,” pp. 9-30 in S. Wheeler (ed.) Controlling Delinquents. New York: Wiley.
