The Effect of Various Instructional Conditions on Expressive Music Performance

Abstract

This study is a comparison of the effectiveness of three approaches used to elicit expressivity in music students' performances: (a) aural modeling, (b) verbal instruction addressing concrete musical properties, and (c) verbal instruction using imagery and metaphor. Thirty-six college pianists worked with three melodies, one in each instructional condition. With each, subjects first gave a baseline performance, then received instruction for performing more expressively, and then gave a final performance. Subjects also verbally reported their thoughts during the process. Results confirmed that musicians can accommodate all three types of instruction used in the study and that each has strengths and weaknesses related to the characteristics of the music being performed and the musicians themselves. Additionally, analysis of the verbal reports suggested that musicians may use a cognitive translation process whereby they convert metaphor/imagery information into more explicit plans for changing the expressive musical properties of their performance (e.g., loudness, tempo, articulation).

August 22, 2005

January 30, 2006

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barten, S. S. (1998). Speaking of music: The use of motor-affective metaphors in music instruction. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 32 (2), 89–97.

Clarke, E. F. (1993). Imitating and evaluating real and transformed musical performances. Music Perception, 10 (3), 317–341.

Clarke, E. F. , & Baker-Short, C. (1987). The imitation of perceived rubato: A preliminary study. Psychology of Music, 15 (1), 58–75.

Dickey, M. R. (1992). A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 27–40.

Ebie, B. D. (2004). The effects of verbal, vocally modeled, kinesthetic, and audio-visual treatment conditions on male and female middle-school vocal music students' abilities to expressively sing melodies. Psychology of Music, 32 (4), 405–417.

Johnson, C. M. (2000). Effect instruction in appropriate rubato usage on the onset timings of musicians in performances of Bach. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 78–84.

Juslin, P. N. , & Laukka, P. (2000). Improving emotional communication in music through cognitive feedback. Musicae Scientiae, 4, 151–183.

Juslin, P. N. , & Persson, R. S. (2002). Emotional communication. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 219–236). New York: Oxford University Press.

Laukka, P. (2004). Instrumental music teachers' views on expressivity: A report from music conservatories. Music Education Research, 6 (1), 45–56.

10.

Lindström, E. , Juslin, P. N. , Bresin, R. , & Williamon, A. (2003). “Expressivity comes from within your soul”: A questionnaire study of music students' perspectives on expressivity. Research Studies in Music Education, 20, 23–47.

11.

Lisboa, T. , Williamon, A. , Zicari, M. , & Eiholzer, H. (2005). Mastery through imitation: A preliminary study. Musicae Scientiae, 9 (1), 75–110.

12.

Persson, R. (1996). Brilliant performers as teachers: A case study of commonsense teaching in a conservatoire setting. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 25–36.

13.

Repp, B. H. (2000). Pattern typicality and dimensional interactions in pianists' imitation of expressive timing and dynamics. Music Perception, 18, 173–211.

14.

Sang, R. C. (1987). A study of the relationship between instrumental music teachers' modeling skills and pupil performance behaviors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 91, 155–159.

15.

Sheldon, D. A. (2004). Listeners' identification of musical expression through figurative language and musical terminology. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 357–368.

16.

Sloboda, J. A. (1996). The acquisition of musical performance expertise: Deconstructing the “talent” account of individual differences in musical expressivity. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence (pp. 107–126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17.

Woody, R. H. (1999). The relationship between advanced musicians' explicit planning and their expressive performance of dynamic variations in an aural modeling task. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 331–342.

18.

Woody, R. H. (2000). Learning expressivity in music performance: An exploratory study. Research Studies in Music Education, 14, 14–23.

19.

Woody, R. H. (2002a). Emotion, imagery and metaphor in the acquisition of musical performance skill. Music Education Research, 4, 213–224.

20.

Woody, R. H. (2002b). The relationship between musicians' expectations and their perception of expressive features in an aural model. Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 53–61.

21.

Young, V. , Burwell, K. , & Pickup, D. (2003). Areas of study and teaching strategies in instrumental teaching: A case study research project. Music Education Research, 5, 139–155.