The concept of choral blend is often adjudicated but seldom researched. Voice matching to achieve choral blend (placing specific voices next to one another to achieve a blended sound within a section) is frequently recommended. The authors asked participants (N = 55) comprised of vocal, instrumental, and nonmusic majors to move a continuous response digital interface dial to indicate judgment of blend quality while listening to voice-matched choral groupings. Graphic analyses indicated general agreement in judgments of good blend and bad blend among all three groups especially within alto and bass excerpts. Less agreement appeared for soprano and tenor excerpts. Pearson correlations between repeated excerpts were highly positive for vocalists but less consistent for others. Vocalists listened longer before making a judgment. Few group differences in judgment magnitude appeared, but general tendencies toward good blend judgments were evident. Discussion included future research implications and applications for educators.
Brittin, R.V. (1996). Listeners' preference for music of other cultures: Comparing response modes. Journal of Research in Music Education , 48, 328-340.
2.
Coggiola, J.C. (2004). The effect of conceptual advancement in jazz music selections and jazz experience on musicians' aesthetic response. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 29-42.
3.
Collins, D. (1999). Teaching choral music (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Daugherty, J.F. (2003). Choir spacing and formation: Choral sound preferences in random, synergistic, and gender-specific chamber choir placements [Electronic version]. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing , 1, 48-59.
5.
Decker, H.A., & Herford, J. (1973). Choral conducting: A symposium. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Eckholm, E. (2000). The effect of singing mode and seating arrangement on choral blend and overall sound. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 123-135.
7.
Flowers, P.J. (2000). The match between music excerpts and written descriptions by fifth and sixth graders. Journal of Research in Music Education , 48, 262-277.
8.
Geringer, J.M., & Madsen, C.K. (1995-1996). Focus of attention to elements: Listening patterns of musicians and nonmusicians. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 80-87.
9.
Geringer, J.M., Madsen, C.K., & Dunnigan, P. (2001). Trumpet tone quality versus intonation revisited . Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education , 148, 65-76.
10.
Geringer, J.M., Madsen, C.K., & Gregory, D. (2004). A fifteen-year history of the continuous response digital interface: Issues relating to validity and reliability. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 160, 65-76.
11.
Giardinare, D.C. (1991). Voice matching: A perceptual study of vocal matches, effect of choral sound, and procedures of inquiry conducted by Weston Noble . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University .
12.
Killian, J.N. (1985). Operant preference for vocal balance in four-voice chorales. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 55-67.
13.
Killian, J.N. (1987). The effect of choral compositional style on operant balance preference. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 213-231). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
14.
Killian, J.N. (2001). The effect of audio, visual and audio-visual performance on perception of musical content. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 148, 77-87.
15.
Kuhn, T. (1980). Instrumentation for the measurement of music attitudes . Contributions to Music Education, 8, 2-38.
16.
LeBlanc, A. (1981). Effects of style, tempo, and performing medium on children's music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 143-156.
17.
LeBlanc, A., & Sherrill, C. (1986). Effect of vocal vibrato and performer's sex on children's music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 222-261.
18.
Lychner, J. (1998). An empirical study concerning terminology relating to aesthetic response to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 303-319.
19.
Madsen, C.K., Brittin, R.V., & Capperella-Sheldon, D.A. (1993). An empirical method for measuring the aesthetic experience to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 57-69.
20.
Madsen, C.K., & Geringer, J.M. (1999). Comparison of good versus bad tone quality/intonation of vocal and string performances: Issues concerning measurement and reliability of the continuous response digital interface. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 141, 86-92.
21.
Noble, W. (2005, February). Voice placing. Presentation at the state convention of the Texas Music Educators Association, San Antonio.
22.
Price, H.E., & Yarbrough, C. (1987). Expressed opinions of composers, musical training, recording ownership, and their interrelationship. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 232-243). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
23.
Sheldon, D.A. (1994). Effects of tempo, musical experience and listening modes on tempo modulation perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 190-202.
24.
Sheldon, D.A., & Gregory, D. (1997). Perception of tempo modulation by listeners of different levels of educational experience. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 367-379.
25.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Sims, W.L. (1995). Children's ability to demonstrate music concept discriminations in listening and singing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 204-221.
27.
Sims, W.L., & Cassidy, J.W. (1997). Verbal and operant responses of young children to vocal versus instrumental song performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 234-244.
