Navigating Gender Bias in Academia: Experiences of Women Music Teacher Educators

Abstract

In this phenomenological study, we explored women music teacher educators’ experiences navigating gender bias in academia. Our research questions were: (1) How do participants describe their experiences in academia? and (2) How do age, rank, experience, geographic region, or school type/size impact their descriptions of their experiences with gender bias and marginalization in academia? We explored the experiences of eight participants in varied stages of their careers (assistant, associate, full professor ranks), concentration areas (chorus, general, instrumental), and schools and locations throughout the United States. Analysis of the data revealed two overarching themes. The first theme, socialization, included four subthemes: (a) socialized gender expectations in the workplace and in their personal lives; (b) gendered service expectations; (c) faculty life, including students’ expectations of their professors; and (d) family life, including unsupportive institutional policies related to maternity leave and childcare. The second theme, coping strategies, included how tenure protections empowered participants to advocate for themselves and others. Developing coalitions with other women colleagues also was impactful. Recommendations for further research and suggestions for practice are discussed.

Keywords

gender equity academia women music teacher educators implicit bias

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiston

S. J.

C. K.

(2021). The silence/ing of academic women. Gender and Education, 33(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716955

Beck

Cadwell

Kern

Dickerson

Howard

(2022). Critical feminist analysis of STEM mentoring programs: A meta-synthesis of the existing literature. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(1), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12729

Bernard

Ryan

G. W.

(2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Sage.

Bettis

Price

P. G.

Benjamin

C. P.

Han

E. J.

(2020). Gender ideology, socialization, and culture. In Naples

N. A.

(Ed.), Companion to women’s and gender studies (pp. 213–234). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/978119315063.ch11

Bird

S. R.

(2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x

Boyle

Boice

(1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22(3), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025183225886

Correll

S. J.

Bernard

Paik

(2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10/1086/511799

De Welde

Stepnick

. (2023). Disrupting the culture of silence: Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education. Stylus Pub. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444299

Dean

Churchill

Ruppanner

(2021). The mental load: Building a deeper theoretical understanding of how cognitive and emotional labor overload women and mothers. Community, Work & Family, 25(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.2002813

10.

Fassinger

R. E.

(2008). Workplace diversity and public policy: Challenges and opportunities for psychology. American Psychologist, 63(4), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.63.4.252

11.

Fitzpatrick

Sweet

(2023). Motherhood in the music academy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 71(44), 373–397. https://doi.org.10.1177/00224294231154277

12.

Gadbois

Graham

(2012). New faculty perceptions of supervision and mentoring: The influence of graduate school experiences. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 5, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v

13.

Garvey

C. M.

Jones

(2021). Is there a place for theoretical frameworks in qualitative research? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920987959

14.

Gill

M. J.

(2020). Phenomenology as qualitative methodology. In Mik-Meyer

Järvinen

(Eds.), Qualitative analysis: Eight approaches for the social sciences (pp. 73–94). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714333.n28

15.

Green

(2017). Gender identity, musical experience and schooling. In Wright

(Ed.), Sociology and music education (pp. 161–176). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090887-7

16.

Harper

E. P.

Baldwin

R. G.

Gansneder

B. G.

Chronister

J. L.

(2001). Full-time women faculty off the tenure track: Profile and practice. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 237–257. https://dx-doi-org-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1353/rhe.2001.0003

17.

Heidegger

(1999). Ontology: Hermeneutics of facticity ( van Buren

Trans.) Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1928)

18.

Johnson-Bailey

Cervero

(2008). Different worlds and divergent paths: Academic careers defined by race and gender. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.2.nl53n670443651l7

19.

Macfarlane

Burg

(2019). Women professors and the academic housework trap. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1589682

20.

Merriam

S. B.

Tisdell

E. J.

(2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616671930

21.

Misra

Lundquist

J. H.

Holmes

Agiomavritis

(2011). The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe, 97(1), 22–26.

22.

Morse

J. M.

(1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), Handbook for qualitative research (pp. 220–235). Sage. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.020213

23.

Morse

J. M.

(1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323500500201

24.

Moustakas

(1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

25.

Patton

M. Q.

(2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199109000-00006

26.

Patton

T. O.

(2004). Reflections of a Black woman professor: Racism and sexism in academia. Howard Journal of Communications, 15(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170490483629

27.

Robnett

R. D.

Vierra

K. D.

(2023). Gender development within patriarchal social systems. In Zurbriggen

E. L.

Capdevila

(Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of power, gender, and psychology (pp. 319–339). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41531-9_18

28.

Roos

P. A.

(2008). Together but unequal: Combating gender inequity in the academy. Journal of Workplace Rights, 13(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.13.2.f

29.

Saldaña

(2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.

30.

Saldaña

Omasta

(2022). Qualitative research: Analyzing life (2nd ed.). Sage.

31.

Schram

T. H.

(2003). Conceptualizing qualitative inquiry: Mindwork for fieldwork in education and the social sciences. Merrill/Prentice Hall.

32.

Shouldice

H. N.

(2023). Gender microaggressions: An examination of existing research on the experiences of female band directors. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 41(3), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221094835

33.

Shouldice

H. N.

Eastridge

(2020). A comparison of Virginia band performance assessments in relation to director gender. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10/1177/0022429420922137

34.

Smith

T. D.

Dansereau

D. R.

Bylica

Dubrot

Hendricks

K. S.

(2024). Interrogating the myth that sexism no longer exists in the music education academy. In Schei

T. B.

Holdhus

Ehrlich

(Eds.), Methodological musings: Thinking with narrative in music education research (pp. 103–117). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67965-0_8

35.

Trollinger

L. M.

(2021). Sex/gender research in music education: A review. Visions of Research in Music Education, 16, Article 5. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/vrme/vol16/iss5/5

36.

van Manen

. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.

37.

Walby

(1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.117/003803589023002004