Response to Intervention (RtI) has become an important element of policy, practice, and research since the 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. In this article, five metrics recommended by Gresham (2005) were used to evaluate the progress of 127 students who were at risk of developing emotional disturbance and enrolled in a Tier 2 targeted group intervention. Student progress on a daily behavior report card was used to identify responders and nonresponders. Results suggest that percentage of change and effect size were the most useful metrics and identified 67% of the students as responders to the intervention. Additionally, 91% of the responders were not identified for special education, and over 50% reduced their problem behavior ratings on the Social Skills Rating System Teacher Form. These findings suggest that the intervention reduced the student's at-risk status and helped prevent the development of emotional and behavioral disabilities.
Ardoin, S.P., Witt, J.C., Connell, J.E., & Koenig, J.L. (2005). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 362-380.
2.
Bailey, D.B., Aytch, L.S., Odom, S.L., Symons, F., & Wolery, M. (1999). Early intervention as we know it. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 1-14.
3.
Bazelon Center. (2004). Failing to qualify: The first step to failure in school. Retrieved February 16, 2006, from http://www.bazelon.org/issues/education/publications/failingtoqualify/failingtoqualify.pdf
4.
Busk, P., & Serlin, R. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. Kratochwill & J. Levin (Eds.), Single-case design and analysis (pp. 187-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Cella, D., Bullinger, M., Scott, C., & Barofsky, I. (2002). Group vs. individual approaches to understanding the clinical significance of differences or changes in quality of life. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 384-392.
6.
Cheney, D., & Stage, S. (2004). Evidence based practices for severe behavior problems (Award H324P040012). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
7.
Collie, A., Maruff, P., McStephen, M., & Darby D. (2003). Are reliable change (RC) calculations appropriate for determining the extent of cognitive change in concussed athletes? Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 370-372.
8.
Coutinho, M., & Denny, K. (1996). National leadership for children and youth with serious emotional disturbance: Progress and prospects. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 207-227.
9.
Crone, D., Horner, R., & Hawken, L.S. (2004). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program. New York: Guilford.
10.
Duncan, B.B., Forness, S.R., & Hartsough, C. (1995). Students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed in school-based day treatment: Cognitive, psychiatric, and special education characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 238-252.
11.
Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M. (2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children, 73, 288-310.
12.
Gresham, F.M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326-343.
13.
Gresham, F.M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 328-344.
14.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15.
Hawken, L.S., Pettersson, H., Mootz, J., & Anderson, C. (2005). The Behavior Education Program DVD: A check-in, check-out intervention for students at risk. New York: Guilford.
16.
Hester, P.P., Baltodano, H.M., Hendrickson, J.M., Tomelson, S.W., Conroy, M.A., & Gable, R.A. (2004). Lessons learned from research on early intervention: What teachers can do to prevent children's behavior problems. Preventing School Failure, 49, 5-10.
17.
Hoagwood, K., & Erwin, H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based mental health services for children: A 10-year research review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 6, 435-451.
18.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
19.
Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
20.
Medalia, A., & Richardson, R. (2005). What predicts a good response to cognitive remediation interventions? Schizophrenia Bulletin , 31, 942-953.
21.
National Longitudinal Transition Study 2. ( 2004). Facts from NLTS2: School behavior and disciplinary experiences of youth with disabilities. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pdf/NLTS2_Discipline_FS_03_21_06.pdf
22.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Retrieved February 1, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/commissionsboards/whspecialeducation/reports/pcesefinalreport.pdf
23.
Public Agenda. (2004). Teaching interrupted: Do discipline policies in today's public schools foster the common good? Retrieved February 1, 2006, from http://www.publicagenda.org
24.
Reichle, J. (1990). National working conference on positive approaches to the management of excess behavior: Final report and recommendations. Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration .
25.
Rose, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. (2005). The 37th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 41-57.
26.
Samuels, C.A. (2005). RtI method gets boost in special education. Education Week, 25, 1, 19.
27.
Sinclair, M.F., Christenson, S.L., Evelo, D.L., & Hurley, C.M. (1998). Dropout prevention for high risk youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure. Exceptional Children, 65, 7-21.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
29.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Digest of Education Statistics, 2005 (NCES 2006-030, Table 50). Jessup, MD: Author.
30.
U.S. Surgeon General. (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general. Retrieved February 15, 2006, from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/home.html
31.
Wagner, M., & Blackorby, J. (2002). Disability profiles of elementary and middle school students with disabilities. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.seels.net/designdocs/SEELS_disability_profile.pdf
32.
Wagner, M., Friend, M., Bursuck, W.D., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A.J., Sumi, W.C., et al. (2006). Educating students with emotional disturbances: A national perspective on school programs and services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 12-30.
33.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Marder, C. (2003). Going to school: Instructional contexts, programs, and participation of secondary school students with disabilities. Retrieved May 2, 2006, from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_12/nlts2_report_2003_12_execsum.pdf
34.
Walker, H.M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
35.
Walker, H.M., & Severson, H. (1992). Systematic screening of behavior disorders (SSBD): A multiple gating procedure. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
36.
Woods, S.P., Childers, M., Ellis, R.J.Guaman, S., Grant, I., & Heaton, R. (2006). A battery approach for measuring neuropsychological change. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 83-89.
