Teacher Decision Making in the Selection of Educational Programming Priorities for Severely Handicapped Children

Abstract

Special education teachers of severely handicapped children are expected to identify appropriate educational priorities from among multiple programming needs. While such decisions are initially formulated with parents and other professionals at the Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting, little is known regarding decisions teachers themselves are most likely to make on behalf of handicapped children. Study 1 investigated the relative importance attributed to various reasons for selecting target behaviors by teachers in comparison with ratings of naive subjects and clinical psychology doctoral students. A factor analysis suggested possible decision dimensions reflecting professional education practices. Study 2 presented special education teachers with a simulated but realistic IEP experience in which they were asked to formulate and rank their annual goals and objectives based upon a child's diagnostic and assessment data. The frequency of the child's excess behaviors had significant impact on the nature of identified educational programming priorities, while developmental level did not. Implications for the IEP process and for the quality of school programs for children with multiple behavior problems are emphasized.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown, L. , Branston, M.B. , Hamre-Nietupski, S. , Pumpian, I. , Certo, N. , & Gruenewald, L. A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 1979, 13, 81-90.

Bricker, W.A. , & Campbell, P.H. Interdisciplinary assessment and programming for multihandicapped students. In W. Sailor , B. Wilcox , & L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1980.

Cooper, H.M. Pygmalion grows up: A model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence. Review of Educational Research , 1979, 49, 389-410.

Cowen, E.L. , Pederson, A. , Babigian, H. , Izzo, L.D. , & Trost, M.A.

Long-term follow-up of early detected vulnerable children

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973 , 41, 438-446.

Elstein A.S. , & Bordage, G. Psychology of clinical reasoning. In G. C. Stone , F. Cohen , & N. E. Adler (Eds.). Health psychology - A handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1979.

Elstein, A.S. , Shulman, L.S. , & Sprafka, S.A. Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press , 1978.

Gaylord-Ross, R. A decision model for the treatment of aberrant behavior in applied settings . In W. Sailor , B. Wilcox , & L. Brown (Eds.). Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes , 1980 .

Green, K.D. , Beck, S.J. , Forehand, R. , & Vosk, B. Validity of teacher nominations of child behavior problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1980, 8, 397-404.

Grossman, H.J. Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency , 1973.

10.

Heads, T.B. Ethical and legal considerations in behavior therapy. In D. Marholin (Ed.). Child behavior therapy . New York: Gardner Press, 1978.

11.

Kaplan, H.F. , & Schwartz, S. Human judgment and decision processes. New York : Academic Press, 1975.

12.

Nelson, R.O. , & Hayes, S.C. Some current dimensions of behavioral assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 1979, 1, 1-16.

13.

Page, E.B. Tests and decisions for the handicapped: A guide to evaluation under the new laws. Journal of Special Education, 1980, 14, 423-483.

14.

Reschly, D.J. , & Lamprecht, M.J.

Expectancy effects of labels: Fact or artifact ?

Exceptional Children, 1979, 46, 55-58.

15.

Rivett, P. Model building for decision analysis. New York : Wiley, 1980.

16.

Rubin, R.A. , & Balow, B. Prevalence of teacher identified behavior problems: A longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 1978, 45, 102-111.

17.

Schroeder, S.R. , Mulick, J.A. , & Schroeder, C.S. Management of severe behavior problems of the retarded. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1978.

18.

Shepherd, M. , Oppenheim, B. , & Mitchell, S. Childhood behaviour and mental health. New York : Grune & Stratton, 1971.

19.

Stolz, S. B and Associates. Ethical issues in behavior modification: Report of the American Psychological Association Commission. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978 .

20.

Tharp, R.G. , & Wetzel, R.J. Behavior modification in the natural environment. New York : Academic Press, 1969.

21.

Voeltz, L.M. , & Evans, I.M. : The assessment of behavioral interrelationships in child behavior therapy . Behavioral Assessment, 1982, 4, 131-165.

22.

Wilson, G. D. (Ed.). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press , 1973.

23.

Wilson, F.E. , & Evans, I.M. The reliability of target-behavior selection in behavioral assessment . Behavioral Assessment, in press.

24.

OSE Policy Paper : Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), Part B, Education of the Handicapped Act, as amended by P.L. 94-142. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, Office of Special Education, May 1980.