Perception of Place and Secondary Articulation Contrasts in Different Syllable Positions: Language-Particular and Language-Independent Asymmetries

Abstract

This study investigated the perception of place and secondary articulation contrasts in different syllable positions by Russian and Japanese listeners. The consonants involved in the study were the Russian plain (velarized) and palatalized labial and coronal voiceless stops in syllable-initial and syllable-final positions at word boundaries. The findings revealed substantial asymmetries in the perception of the contrasts by both groups of listeners: With respect to positions, consonants in syllable-final position were characterized by lower correct identification rates and (less consistently) longer reaction time than the same consonants in syllable-initial position. Positional differences were accompanied by differences in segment-specific contexts. With respect to individual consonants, the palatalized labial /p ^j/ and the plain coronal /t/ showed a lower correct identification rate and smaller perceptual distance than the plain labial /p/ and the palatalized coronal /t^j/. The results also showed some differences between Russian and Japanese listeners in the perception of the contrast. These differences can be explained by phonotactic differences between the two languages, as well as by differences in the phonetic realizations of the consonants. The results of the study provide evidence for the role of both universal and language-particular factors in speech perception.

Keywords

palatalization perception phonotactics place syllable position

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ando, A. (Ed.) (1997). Roshiago mini-jiten [Russian mini-dictionary]. Tokyo: Hakusuisha.

Avanesov, R.I. (1972). Russkoe literaturnoe proiznoshenie [Russian literary pronunciation]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie .

Best, C.T. , McRoberts, G. , & Sithole, N. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345 - 360.

Bolla, K. (1981). A conspectus of Russian speech sounds. Cologne: Bölau.

Byrd, D. (1992). Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: A gestural model. Phonetica, 49,1-24.

Cohen, J.D. , MacWhinney, B. , Flatt, M. , & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 257-271.

Flemming, E.S. (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

Fujimura, O. , Macchi, M. , & Streeter, L.A. (1978). Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Speech, 21, 337-346.

Hume, E. , & Johnson, K. (2001a). A model of the interplay of speech perception and phonology. In E. Hume & K. Johnson (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp. 3 - 26). New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.

10.

Hume, E. & Johnson, K. (Eds.) (2001b). The role of speech perception in phonology. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.

11.

Hura, S. , Lindblom, B. , & Diehl, R. (1992). On the role of perception in shaping phonological assimilation rules. Language and Speech, 35, 59-72.

12.

Ito, I. ( 1993) Furiiuei Roshiago [Freeway Russian]. Tokyo: Natsume.

13.

Ito, J. , & Mester, A. (2003). Japanese morphophonemics: Markedness and word structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

14.

Johnson, K. (2003). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

15.

Jones, D. , & Ward, D. (1969). The phonetics of Russian. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Jun, J. ( 1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An Optimality Theoretic approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

17.

Kavitskaya, D. (to appear). Perceptual salience and palatalization in Russian. Papers in Laboratory Phonology VIII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

18.

Kingston, J. (to appear). Keeping and losing contrasts. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2002.

19.

Kochetov, A. (2002). Production, perception, and emergent phonotactic patterns: A case of contrastive palatalization. New York /London: Routledge. [University of Toronto Ph.D. Thesis, 2001.]

20.

Kochetov, A. (2005). Free choice task effects in cross-linguistic stop perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(4), Pt.2, 2457.

21.

Kochetov, A. (to appear). Syllable position effects and gestural organization: Evidence from Russian. In C. Best , L. Goldstein , & D. Whalen (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology VIII. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

22.

Kochetov, A. , & Goldstein, L. (2001). Competing recoverability factors and inter-gestural phasing in Russian stop clusters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Linguistic Society of America, January 2001.

23.

Kuhl, P.K. , Williams, K.A. , Lacerda, F. , Stevens, K.N. , & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by six months of age. Science, 255, 606-608.

24.

Ladefoged, P. , & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's language. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

25.

Ohala, J. (1990). The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation . In J. Kingston and M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 258-275). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Perkell, J. , Cohen, M. , Svirsky, M. , Matthies, M. , Garabieta, I. , & Jackson, M. (1992). ``Electro-magnetic midsagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements,'' Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3078-3096.

27.

Redford, M.A. , & Diehl, R. (1999). The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 106(3), 1555 - 1565.

28.

Shepard, R.N. (1972). Psychological representation of speech sounds . In E.E. David & B. Denes (Eds.), Human communication: A unified view (pp. 67-113). New York: McGraw Hill.

29.

Silverman, D. (1997). Phasing and recoverability. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.

30.

Steriade, D. (2001). Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account. In E. Hume & K. Johnson (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp.219-250). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

31.

Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

32.

Surprenant, A. , & Goldstein, L. (1998). The perception of speech gestures. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 104, 518-529.

33.

Timberlake, A. (1993). Russian. In B. Comrie & G. G. Corbett (Eds.), The Slavonic languages (pp. 827-886). New York, N.Y. : Routledge.

34.

Tsujimura, N. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

35.

Vance, T.J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. New York, N.Y.: SUNY Press.

36.

Vihman, M.M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell .

37.

Winters, S. (2001). VCCV Perception: Putting place in its place. In E. Hume & K. Johnson (Eds.), Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 55, 70-81.

38.

Wright, R. (2001). Perceptual cues in contrast maintenance. In E. Hume & K. Johnson (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp. 251-277). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

39.

Wright, R. (2003). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation . In J. Local , R. Ogden , & R. Temple (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI (pp. 75 - 87). Cambridge University Press.

40.

Zsiga, E.C. (2000). Phonetic alignment constraints: Consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. Journal of Phonetics , 28(1), 69-102.