In addition to the phrase-final accent (FA), the French phonological system includes a phonetically distinct Initial Accent (IA). The present study tested two proposals: that IA marks the onset of phonological phrases, and that it has an independent rhythmic function. Eight adult native speakers of French were instructed to read syntactically ambiguous French sentences (e.g., Les gants et les bas lisses `the smooth gloves and stockings') in a way that disambiguated the scope of the adjective. When the final adjective (lisses) applies to the conjoined NP, a prosodic boundary is warranted immediately before the adjective; when it applies to the second NP alone, a boundary before that NP is more appropriate. Length of the second noun and the adjective were varied from one to four syllables to investigate length-related tendencies toward phonological boundary marking and toward rhythmic placement of IA. For the materials from six speakers whose readings were correctly interpreted by native listeners, incidence of word-initial prosodic peaks was affected by both structure and length, with most reliable occurrence at onsets of Minor/Phonological Phrases. The only effect of rhythmicity independent of phrase structure was omission of FA in stress clash with IA.
Astésano, C. (2001). Rythme et accentuation en français. Invariance et variabilité stylistique. Paris: Editions L'Harmattan.
2.
Beckman, M.E., & Edwards, J. (1992). Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. In Y. Sagisaka (Ed.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure (pp.359-375). Tokyo: OHM Publishing.
3.
Beckman, M.E., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonological Yearbook, 3, 255-309.
4.
Bolinger, D. (1981). Two kinds of vowels, two kinds of rhythm. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
5.
Bolinger, D. (1985). Intonation and its parts. Melody in spoken English . London: Edward Arnold.
6.
Dahan, D., & Bernard, J.M. (1996). Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French. Language and Speech, 39(4), 341-374.
7.
Delais, E. (1994). Prédiction de la variabilité dans la distribution des accents et les découpages prosodiques en français. In Proceedings of XX ièmes Journées d'Études sur la Parole (pp.379-384). Trégastel, France.
8.
Delais, E. (1995). Pour une approche parallèle de la structure prosodique. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.
9.
Delattre, P. (1962). Some factors of vowel duration and their cross-linguistic validity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1141-1143.
10.
Delattre, P. (1966). Studies in French and comparative phonetics. The Hague, Holland: Mouton.
11.
Di Cristo, A. (2000). Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation en français. Deuxième partie: Le modèle. Journal of French Language Studies , 10, 27-44.
12.
Di Cristo, A., & Hirst, D.J. (1993). Rythme syllabique, rythme mélodique et représentation hiérarchique de la prosodie du français. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 15, 13 - 23.
13.
Espesser, R. (1996). MES: Un environnement de traitement du signal . In Proceedings of, XXIe Journées d'Etude sur la Parole (p.447), Avignon , France.
14.
Fant, G., Kruckenberg, A., & Nord, L. (1991). Language specific patterns of prosodic and segmental structures in Swedish, French and English. In Proceedings of ICPhS XII (pp.247-250), Aix-en-Provence, France.
15.
Fónagy, I. (1980). L'accent en français: Accent probabilitaire. In I. Fónagy & P. Léon (Eds.), L'accent en français contemporain (pp. 123-233).
16.
Gee, J.P., & Grosjean, F. (1983). Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 411-458.
17.
Hirst, D.J., & DI Cristo, A. (1984). French intonation: A parametric approach. Die Neueren Sprachen, 83, 554-569.
18.
Hirst, D.J., & Espesser, R. (1993). Automatic modeling of fundamental frequency with a quadratic spline function. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique d'Aix, 15, 71-85.
19.
House, D., Hermes, D., & Beaugendre, F. (1997). Temporal alignment categories of accent-lending rises and falls. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 2 (pp. 879-882), Rhodes, Greece.
20.
Jun, S.A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology (pp.209-242). Dordrecht: KAP.
21.
Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22.
Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity . Glossa, 7, 107-122.
23.
Lucci, V. (1983). Étude phonétique du français contemporain à travers la variation situationnelle. Grenoble, France: Publications de l'Université des Langues et Lettres de Grenoble .
24.
Mertens, P. (1992). L'accentuation de syllabes contiguës. In N. Delbecque & P. Swiggers (Eds.), Études de linguistique générale et romane (Vol. 1, pp.145-165.).
25.
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht : Foris.
26.
Nord, L., Kruckenberg, A., & Fant, G. (1990). Some aspects of rhythm in prose, poetry and music . In I. Raimo (Ed.), Nordic prosody: (Vol. 5, pp.256-265). Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
27.
Pasdeloup, V. (1990). Modèle de règles rythmiques du français appliqué à la synthèse de la parole. Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
28.
Post, B. (2000). Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen , The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
29.
Price, P.J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956-2970.
30.
Raaijmakers, J., Schrijnemakers, J., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
31.
Rolland, G., & Loevenbruck, H. (2002). Characteristics of the accentual phrase in French: An acoustic, articulatory and perceptual study . In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 (pp. 611-614). France: Aix-en-Provence.
32.
Rossi, M. (1985). L'intonation et l'organisation de l'énoncé. Phonetica, 42, 135-153.
33.
Seguinot, A. (1976). L'accent d'insistance en français standard. Studia Phonetica, 12, 1 - 58.
34.
Selkirk, E. (1980). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. Nordic Prosody, 2, 111-140.
35.
Selkirk, E. (1981). On the nature of phonological representation. In T. Myers, J. Laver & J. Anderson (Eds.), The cognitive representation of speech (pp. 379-388). Amsterdam: North Holland.
36.
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Ross, K. (1994). Stress shift and early pitch accent placement in lexical items inAmerican English. Journal of Phonetics , 22, 357 - 388.
38.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 25, 193-247.
39.
Vaissiere, J. (1990). Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In J. Sundberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson. (Eds.), Music, language, speech and brain, (pp.108-120), MacMillan Press.
40.
Watson, D., & Gibson, E. (2004). The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 713-755.
41.
Welby, P. (2002). The realization of early and late rises in French intonation: A production study. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody, 2002 Conference (pp.695-698). France: Aix-en-Provence.
42.
Welby, P. (2006). French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment. Journal of Phonetics, 34(3), 343-371.
43.
Wenk, B.J., & Wioland, F. (1982). Is French really syllable-timed? Journal of Phonetics, 10(2), 193-216.
