While listeners are recognizing words from the connected speech stream, they are also parsing information from the intonational contour. This contour may contain cues to word boundaries, particularly if a language has boundary tones that occur at a large proportion of word onsets. We investigate how useful the pitch rise at the beginning of an accentual phrase (APR) would be as a potential word-boundary cue for Japanese listeners. A corpus study shows that it should allow listeners to locate approximately 40—60% of word onsets, while causing less than 1% false positives. We then present a word-spotting study which shows that Japanese listeners can, indeed, use accentual phrase boundary cues during segmentation. This work shows that the prosodic patterns that have been found in the production of Japanese also impact listeners’ processing.
Atterer, M., & Ladd, D.R. ( 2004). On the phonetics and phonology of "segmental anchoring" of f0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 177-197.
2.
Beckman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255-309.
3.
Boersma, P. ( 2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer . Glot International, 5, 341-345.
4.
Byrd, D., Krivokapić, J., & Lee, S. ( 2006). How far, how long: On the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 120, 1589-1599.
5.
Cho, T., McQueen, J.M., & Cox, E.A. ( 2007). Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 210-243.
6.
Christophe, A., Peperkamp, S., Pallier, C., Block, E., & Mehler, J. ( 2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access . I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 523-547.
7.
Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218-236.
8.
Cutler, A., & Carter, D. ( 1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142.
9.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech , 40, 141-201.
10.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. ( 1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals . Cognitive Psychology, 24, 381-410.
11.
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. ( 1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
12.
Cutler, A., Norris, D., & McQueen, J.M. ( 1996). Lexical access in continuous speech: Language-specific realisations of a universal model. In T. Otake & A. Cutler (Eds.), Phonological Structure and Language Processing (pp.227-242). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
13.
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. ( 2002). Rhythmic categories in spoken-word recognition . Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 296-322.
14.
Goldinger, S.D., & Azuma, T. ( 2003). Puzzle-solving science: The quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 305-320.
15.
Gout, A., Christophe, A., & Morgan, J.L. ( 2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access. II. Infant data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 548-567.
16.
Haraguchi, S. ( 1977). The tone pattern of Japanese: An autosegmental theory of tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha .
17.
Harrington, J., Watson, G., & Cooper, M. ( 1989). Word boundary detection in broad class and phoneme strings . Computer Speech and Language, 3, 367-382.
18.
Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. ( 1998). A survey of intonation systems. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems (pp.1 -44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Kim, S. ( 2004). The role of prosodic phrasing in Korean word segmentation. unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, UCLA, U.S.A.
20.
Ladd, D.R., & Schepman, A. ( 2003). "Sagging transitions" between high pitch accents in English: Experimental evidence. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 81-112.
21.
Maekawa, K., & Igarashi, Y. ( 2007). Prosodic phrasing of bimoraic accented particles in spontaneous Japanese. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Saarbrücken2007. Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://www.icphs2007.de/
22.
Maekawa, K., Kikuchi, H., Igarashi, Y., & Venditti, J.J. (2002). X-JToBI: An extended J-ToBI for spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (pp.1545-1548) . Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/icslp_2002/i02_1545.html
23.
McClelland, J., & Elman, J. ( 1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
24.
McQueen, J.M. ( 1996). Word spotting. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 695-699.
25.
McQueen, J.M. ( 1998). Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics . Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 21-46.
26.
McQueen, J.M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. ( 1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
27.
McQueen, J.M., Otake, T., & Cutler, A. ( 2001). Rhythmic cues and possible-word constraints in Japanese speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language , 45, 103-132.
28.
Milotte, S., René, A., Wales, R., & Christophe, A. (2008). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 874-885.
29.
Muthusamy, Y.K., Cole, R.A., & Oshika, B.T. ( 1992). The OGI multi-language telephone speech corpus . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (pp.895-898). Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/icslp_1992/i92_0895.html
30.
Nakatani, L.H., & Schaffer, J.A. (1978). Hearing "words" without words: Prosodic cues for word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 234-245.
31.
Norris, D. ( 1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
32.
Norris, D., & McQueen, J.M. ( 2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition . Psychological Review, 115, 357-395.
33.
Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., Mehler, J. ( 1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese . Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 258-278.
34.
Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. ( 1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge : MIT Press.
35.
Poser, W. ( 1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, U.S.A.
36.
Salverda, A.P., Dahan, D., McQueen, J.M. ( 2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90, 51-89.
37.
Salverda, A.P., Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M.K., Crosswhite, K., Masharov, M., & McDonough, J. ( 2007). Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition. Cognition, 105, 466-476.
38.
Speer, S.R., Warren, P., & Schafer, A. ( 2003). Intonation and sentence processing. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 3-9 August 2003. Retrieved July 11, 2009, from http://www.2.hawaii.edu/~aschafer/SWS_ICPhS03.pdf
39.
Suomi, K., McQueen, J.M., & Cutler, A. ( 1997). Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish . Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 422-444.
40.
Vaissière, J. ( 1983a). The search for language-independent prosodic features . In La percezione del linguaggio (pp.311-388). Florence : Presso l’Accad. della Crusca.
41.
Vaissière, J. ( 1983b). Language-independent prosodic features. In A. Cutler & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements, (pp.53-66). Berlin : Springer Verlag.
42.
Vance, T.J. ( 1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany State University of New York Press.
43.
Venditti, J.J. ( 2005). The J_ToBI model of Japanese intonation. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology and Intonation of Phrasing, (pp.172-200). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
44.
Venditti, J.J., Maekawa, K., & Beckman, M.E. (in press). Prominence marking in the Japanese intonation system. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Warner, N., & Arai, T. ( 2001). The role of the mora in the timing of spontaneous Japanese speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 109, 1144-1156.
46.
Warner, N., Kim, J., Davis, C., & Cutler, A. ( 2005). Use of complex phonological patterns in processing: Evidence from Korean. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 353-387.
47.
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. ( 2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 119, 597-607.
48.
Welby, P.S. ( 2003). The slaying of Lady Mondegreen, being a study of French tonal association and alignment and their role in speech segmentation . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, U.S.A.
49.
Welby, P.S. ( 2006). French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment . Journal of Phonetics, 34, 343-371.
50.
Welby, P.S. ( 2007). The role of early fundamental frequency rises and elbows in French word segmentation. Speech Communication , 49, 28-48.
51.
Wittenburg, P., Nagengast, J., & Baumann, H. ( 1998). NESU: The Nijmegen experiment setup. In A. Trapp, N. Hammond , & C. Manning (Eds.), CIP98 conference proceedings (pp.92-93).York: CTI Centre for Psychology.
