The cross modal repetition priming paradigm was used to investigate how potential lexically ambiguous no-release variants are processed. In particular we focus on segmental regularities that affect the variant’s frequency of occurrence (voicing of the critical segment) and phonological context in which the variant occurs (status of the following word-initial segment). Primes consisted of carrier words ending in a segment likely (voiced; e.g., BAND) or unlikely (voiceless; PLANT) to be produced in no-release form followed by a consonant or vowel onset context word. Each carrier word had an embedded lexical competitor (embedded word) formed by the segments prior to its final consonant (e.g., plan in plant). Productions of these embedded words (true embedded word) were also used as primes. Both true embedded words (Experiments 1a—1c) and carrier words (Experiments 2a—2c) were used as visual targets. The results are discussed in terms of the contribution of probabilistic speech events to theories of spoken word recognition and lexical competition.
Coady, J.A., Kluender, K.R., & Rhode, W.S. ( 2003) Effects of contrast between onsets of speech and other complex spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 114, 2225-2235.
2.
Connine, C.M. ( 2004). It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition . Psychological Bulletin and Review, 11, 1084-1089.
3.
Connine, C.M., Blasko, D.G., & Wang, J. ( 1994). Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context . Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 624-636.
4.
Crystal, T.H., & House, A.S. ( 1988). The duration of American-English stop consonants: an overview. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 285-294.
5.
Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Gaskell, M.G. ( 2002). Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 218-244.
6.
Deelman, T., & Connine, C.M. ( 2001). Missing information in spoken word recognition: Nonreleased stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 656-663.
7.
Francis, W.N., & Kucera, H. ( 1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Frauenfelder, U.H., & Peeters, G. ( 1990). Lexical segmentation in TRACE: An exercise in simulation . In G. T. M. Altman (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives (pp. 50-86). MIT Press.
9.
Gow, D.W., & Im, A.M. ( 2004). A cross-linguistic examination of assimilation context effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 279-296.
10.
Grosjean, F. ( 1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: evidence and implications. Perception & Psychophysics , 38, 299-310.
11.
Janse, E., Nooteboom, S.G., & Quené, H. (2007). Coping with gradient forms of /t/-deletion and lexical ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 161-200.
12.
LoCasto, P.C., & Connine, C.M. ( 2002). Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 208-219.
13.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Nix, A., & Gaskell, G. ( 1995). Phonological variation in lexical process: Abstractness, inference and English place assimilation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 285-308.
14.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Warren, P. ( 1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review , 101, 653-675.
15.
Martin, J.G., & Bunnell, H.T. ( 1981). Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 559-567.
16.
McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. ( 1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-18.
17.
Mitterer, H., Csépe, V., & Blomert, L. ( 2006). The role of perceptual integration in the perception of assimilation word forms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1395-1424.
18.
Mitterer, H., & Ernestus, M. ( 2006). Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 73-103.
19.
Mitterer, H., Yoneyama, K., & Ernestus, M. ( 2008). How we hear what is hardly there: Mechanisms underlying compensation for /t/-reduction in speech comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 133-152.
20.
Nooteboom, S., Janse, E., Quené, H., & te Riele, S. ( 2000). Proceedings from the Spoken Word Access Processes workshop (pp. 15-18). Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
21.
Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. ( 2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 299-370.
22.
Quené, H., van Rossum, M., & van Wijck, M. ( 1998). Assimilation and anticipation in word perception. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Sydney, Australia.
23.
Ranbom, L.R., & Connine, C.M. ( 2007). Lexical representation of phonological variation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 273-298.
24.
Ranbom, L.R., Connine, C.M., & Yudman, E. ( 2009). Is phonological context always used to recognize variant forms in spoken word recognition? The role of variant frequency and context distribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 1205-1220.
25.
Raphael, L.J. ( 1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants inAmerican English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1296-1303.
26.
Salverda, A.P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J.M. ( 2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90, 51-89.
27.
Streeter, L.A., & Nigro, G.N. ( 1979). The role of medial consonant transitions in word perception . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65, 1533-1541.
28.
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A.G. ( 2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of the final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 322-338.
29.
Warren, P., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 262-275.
30.
Warren, P., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1988). Cues to lexical choice: Discriminating place and voice. Perception & Psychophysics , 43, 21-30.
