The Perception of Pathologically-disordered Phonation by Gujarati,English,and Spanish Listeners

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of linguistic experience on the perception of pathologically-disordered voices using 18 listeners of American English, which has allophonic breathiness, 12 listeners of Gujarati, which contrasts breathy and modal vowels, and 18 listeners of Spanish, which has neither allophonic nor phonemic breathiness. Listeners rated the similarity of pairs of pathologically-disordered voices. Multidimensional scaling was used to determine the properties that were most correlated with perception for each listener group. Results showed that Gujaratis’ perception was correlated with the difference between the amplitude of the first (H1*) and second (H2*) harmonic (H1*-H2*), which is associated with the production of phonation in Gujarati. English listeners’ judgments were correlated with the measure H1*-H2* and cepstral peak prominence, and Spanish listeners’ judgments were correlated with H1*-H2 and H1*-A1* (the amplitude of the principal harmonic near the first formant). When compared to Esposito (2006), which asked the same listeners to rate the similarity of breathy and modal vowels from Mazatec, results showed that Gujarati listeners classified the pathologically-disordered stimuli in the same way that they classified the Mazatec stimuli, while English and Spanish listeners perceived the pathologically-disordered stimuli and the Mazatec stimuli in slightly different ways.

Keywords

Gujarati pathologically-disordered voices perception phonation voice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrade, A. ( 2003). Intonational phonology of alteño Spanish (Master’s thesis). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

Antoñanzas-Barroso, N. ( 2005). Similarity Rating [computer software]. Los Angeles: Bureau of Glottal

Affairs , Department of Head and Neck, UCLA School of Medicine .

Bickley, C. ( 1982). Acoustic analysis and perception of breathy vowels. Speech Communication Group Working Papers- MIT, 73-93.

Blankenship, B. ( 1997). The time course of breathiness and laryngealization in vowels (PhD dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D. ( 2008). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.0.30) [Computer program]. Retrieved September 10, 2006 from http://www.praat.org/

Canfield, D.L. ( 1981). Spanish pronunciation in the Americas. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Dilley, L. , Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. , & Ostendorf, M. ( 1996). Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 423-444.

Epstein, M. ( 1999). A comparison of linguistic and pathological breathiness using the LF model (Master’s thesis). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

10.

Epstein, M. ( 2002). Voice quality and prosody in English (Doctoral dissertation) . UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

11.

Esposito, C.M. ( 2005). Pilot of the effects of linguistic experience on the perception of phonation. Unpublished manuscript. UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

12.

Esposito, C.M. ( 2006). The effects of linguistic experience on the perception of phonation (Doctoral dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

13.

Fischer-Jørgensen, E. ( 1967). Phonetic analysis of breathy (murmured) vowels. Indian Linguistics, 28, 71-139.

14.

Hanson, H.M. ( 1995). Glottal characteristics of female speakers (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

15.

Hillenbrand, J.M. , Cleveland, R.A. , & Erickson, R.L. (1994). Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research , 37, 769-778.

16.

Holmberg, E.B. , Hillman, R.E. , Perkell, J.S. , Guiod, P.C. , & Goldman, S.L. ( 1995). Comparisons among aerodynamic, electroglottographic, and acoustic spectral measures of female voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1212-1223.

17.

Huffman, M.K. ( 1987). Measures of phonation type in Hmong. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 495-504.

18.

Iseli, M. , Shue, Y.-L. , & Alwan, A. ( 2007). Age, sex, and vowel dependencies of acoustic measures related to the voice source. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2283-2295.

19.

Klatt, D.H. , & Klatt, L.C. ( 1990). Analysis, synthesis and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 820-857.

20.

Kreiman, J. ( 1982). Perception of sentences and paragraph boundaries in natural conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 163-175.

21.

Kreiman, J. , & Gerratt, B.R. ( 1996). The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(3), 1787-1795.

22.

Kreiman, J. , & Gerratt, B.R. ( 1999). Measuring vocal quality. In R. Kent R & M. J. Ball (Eds.), Handbook of voice quality measurement (pp. 73-102). San Diego, CA : Singular Publishing Group, Inc.

23.

Kreiman, J. , & Gerratt, B.R. ( 2000). Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1867-1879.

24.

Kreiman, J. , Gerratt, B.R. , Antonanzas-Barroso, N. , & Berke, G.S. ( 1993). Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 14-20.

25.

Kreiman, J. , Gerratt, B.R. , & Berke, G.S. ( 1994). The multidimensional nature of pathological voice quality . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(3), 1291-1301.

26.

Kreiman, J. , Gerratt, B.R. , & Precoda, K. ( 1990). Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 103-115.

27.

Ladefoged, P. ( 1983). The linguistic use of different phonation types. In D. Bless & J. Abbs (Eds.), Vocal fold physiology: Contemporary research and clinical issues (pp. 351-360). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.

28.

Ladefoged, P. , & Maddieson, I. ( 1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

29.

Laver, J. ( 1980). Phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Löfqvist, A. , & McGowan, R.S. ( 1992). Influence of consonantal environment on voice source aerodynamics. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 93-110.

31.

Pierrehumbert, J. , & Talkin, D. ( 1991). Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 2, 90-117.

32.

Shrivastav, R. , & Sapienza, C. ( 2006). Some difference limens for the perception of breathiness . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(1), 416-423.

33.

Shue, Y. , Keating, P. , & Vicenik, C. ( 2009). VoiceSauce: A program for voice analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society America, 124(4), 2221.

34.

Stevens, K. ( 1977). Physics of laryngeal behavior and larynx modes. Phonetica, 34, 264-279.

35.

Stevens, K.N. ( 1988). Modes of vocal fold vibration based on a two-section model. In O. Fujimura (Ed.), Vocal physiology: Voice production, mechanisms, and function (pp. 357-371). New York: Raven Press.

36.

Stevens, K.N. , & Hanson, H. ( 1995). Classification of glottal vibration from acoustic measurements . In O. Fujimura & M. Hirano (Eds.), Voice quality control (pp. 335-342). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.

37.

Upperman, G. ( 2004). Changing pitch with PSOLA for voice conversion. Retrieved November 16, 2007 from http://cnx.org/content/m12474/latest/