Reactions Toward Varying Degrees of Accentedness in the Speech of Spanish-English Bilinguals

Abstract

Approximately 100 college students were asked to evaluate Spanish-English bilingual speakers on the basis of taped readings of an English text. The speakers were chosen to represent a wide range of accentedness. The relationship between the amount of accentedness heard and the attributed characteristics of the speaker was investigated. The results show that the students made rather fine discriminations among varying degrees of accentedness in rating a speaker's personal attributes and speech. Support was thus found for the proposition that Spanish-accented English is negatively stereotyped and that the more accented the speech, the stronger the stereotype. By employing a seven-point rating scale with large groups rather than more involved scaling techniques based on individual testing, this study attempted to generalize the results of recent research which indicated that linguistically naive persons can reliably rate varying degrees of accentedness. Indeed, since the more convenient group-administered rating scale procedure provided high correlations with the accentedness scores obtained via more complicated scaling techniques, research concerned with reactions to a range of accentedness can progress rapidly.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baird, S.J. ( 1969). Employment Interview Speech: a Social Dialect Study in Austin, Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas , Austin.

Barker, G.C. ( 1947). Social functions of language in a Mexican-American community . Acta Americana, 5, 185-202.

Brennan, E.M. , Ryan, E.B. and Dawson, W.E. ( 1975). Scaling of apparent accentedness by magnitude estimation and sensory modality matching. J. psycholing. Res. , 4, 27-36.

Carter, T.P. ( 1970). An interview with Thomas P. Carter. National Elementary Principal, 50, 94-7.

D'Anglejan, A. and Tucker, G.R. ( 1973). Sociolinguistic correlates of speech style in Quebec . In Shuy, R. and Fasold, R. (eds.), Language Attitudes; Current Trends and Prospects (Washington, D.C.).

Eisler, H. ( 1962). On the problem of category scales in psychophysics. Scandinavian J. Psychol., 3, 81-7.

Engen, T. ( 1971). Psychophysics II. Scaling methods. In Kling, L.W. and Riggs, L. A. (eds.), Woodworth & Schlosberg's Experimental Psychology, 3rd ed. (New York ).

Fishman, J.A. and Hofman, J.E. ( 1966). Mother tongue and nativity in the American population . In Fishman, J. A. (ed.), Language Loyalty in the United States (London).

Giles, H. ( 1970). Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Rev., 22, 211-27.

10.

Giles, H. ( 1972). The effects of stimulus mildness-broadness in the evaluation of accents. Language and Speech, 15, 262-9.

11.

Keppel, C. ( 1973). Design and Analysis: A Researchers Handbook (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).

12.

Metcalf, A.A. ( 1972). Mexican American English in Southern California , Western Rev., 9, 13-21.

13.

Ornstein, J. ( 1971). Sociolinguistic research on language diversity in the American Southwest and its educational implications. Mod. Lang. J., 55, 223-9.

14.

Ortego, P.D. ( 1969). Some cultural implications of a Mexican-American border dialect of American English. Studies in Linguistics , 21, 77-84.

15.

Ryan, E.B. and Carranza, M.A. ( 1975). Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. J. of Personality and Social Psychol., 31, 855-63.

16.

Tucker, G.R. and Lambert, W.E. ( 1969). White and Negro listeners' reactions to various American English dialects. Social Forces, 47, 463-8.

17.

Williams, F. , Hewett, N. , Miller, L.M. , Naremore, R.C. and Whitehead, J.L. ( 1976). Explorations of the Linguistic Attitudes of Teachers (Rowley, Massachusetts).