On the Relation Between Processing the Roman and the Cyrillic Alphabets: a Preliminary Analysis with Bi-Alphabetical Readers

Abstract

Serbo-Croatian is read, to a greater or lesser degree depending on locale, in two alphabets, the Roman and the Cyrillic. While most letters are solely members of one or the other alphabet, some letters are shared and of these, some are ambiguous in that they are read differently in the two alphabets. The order in which the alphabets are acquired depends on geography: in the eastern part of the country the order is Cyrillic then Roman; in the western part of the country the order is Roman then Cyrillic. A series of six experiments is reported examining the relation, in processing terms, between the two alphabets. Evidence is presented for a processing asymmetry. Processing the letters of the first-acquired alphabet is more similar to processing the letters of the second-acquired alphabet than vice versa. Additionally, it is shown that searching for a letter in the other alphabet is faster than searching for a letter in the same alphabet, suggesting that alphabet categorization may precede letter identification. The results are discussed in terms of the general problem of operating with two separately used symbol systems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brand, J. ( 1971). Classification without identification in visual search. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 23, 178-86.

Broadbent, D.E. ( 1971). Decision and Stress (London).

Brown, J. ( 1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quart . J. exp. Psychol., 10, 12-21.

Clark, H.H. ( 1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav., 12, 335-59.

Coltheart, M. ( 1975). Iconic memory: a reply to Professor Holding. Memory & Cognition, 3, 42-8.

Dick, A.O. ( 1974). Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Percep. Psychophys., 16, 575-96.

Egeth, H. Jonides, J. and Wall, S. ( 1972). Parallel processing of multi-element displays . Cogn. Psychol., 3, 674-98.

Forster, K.I. and Bednall, E.S. ( 1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access . Memory & Cognition, 4, 53-61.

Gibson, E.J. ( 1965). Learning to read. Science, 148, 1066-72.

10.

Gibson, E.J. ( 1969). Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development (New York).

11.

Haber, R.N. ( 1969). Information processing analyses of visual perception: an introduction. In R.N. Haber (ed.), Information Processing Approaches to Visual Perception (New York) .

12.

Ingling, N. ( 1972). Categorization: a mechanism for rapid information processing . J. exp. Psychol., 94, 239-43.

13.

Jonides, J. and Gleitman, H.A. ( 1972). A conceptual category effect in visual search: 0 as letter or digit. Percep. Psychophys., 12, 457-60.

14.

Neisser, U. ( 1967). Cognitive Psychology (New York).

15.

Peterson, L.R. and Peterson, M.J. ( 1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items . J. exp. Psychol., 58, 193-8.

16.

Posner, M.I. ( 1969). Abstraction and the process of retention. In G.H. Bower and J.T. Spence (eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 3, (New York).

17.

Posner, M.I. ( 1970). On the relationship between letter names and superordinate categories. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.., 22, 279-87.

18.

Reynolds, A.G. and Flagg, P.W. ( 1977). Cognitive Psychology (Cambridge, Mass.).

19.

Sperling, G. ( 1960). The information available in brief visual presentations . Psychol. Monogr., 74, (Whole No. 498).

20.

Sperling, G. , Budiansky, J. , Spivak, J.G. and Johnson, M.C. ( 1971). Extremely rapid visual search: the maximum rate of scanning letters for the presence of a numeral. Science , 174, 307-11.

21.

Tomić, T. ( 1975). Statistical properties of Serbo-Croatian language . Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference of ETAN .

22.

Tversky, A. ( 1977). Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. , 84, 327-52.

23.

Wickens, D.D. ( 1970). Encoding categories of words: an empirical approach to meaning. Psychol. Rev., 77, 1-15.