Accentedness Ratings and Phonological Variables as Measures of Variation in Pronunciation

Abstract

Verbally neutral, spontaneous speech samples were selected from interviews with 16 younger and 16 older males (mean ages 17 and 69 years, respectively) varying in socio-economic status (SES). All informants were native of Nijmegen, a city in the mideast of the Netherlands. The speech samples were rated with respect to the degree of accentedness and the pronunciation of six phonological variables with variants typical for the Nijmegen dialect. A factor analysis based on the correlations among the phonological variables yielded two factors, the first with high loadings of the four vowels, the second with a high loading of one of the two consonants, the /v/. The other consonant, the /z/, did not contribute to either factor. There was a strong correlation between the factor-1 scores on the one hand and accentedness and SES on the other. The factor-2 scores correlated with age. Some methodological and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asendorpf, J. and Wallbott, H.G. ( 1979). Masse der Beobachtungsübereinstimmung: Ein systematischer Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Socialpsychologie , 10, 243-252.

Brennan, E.M. and Brennan, J.S. ( 1981a). Measurements of accent and attitude toward Mexican-American speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 487-501.

Brennan, E.M. and Brennan, J.S. ( 1981b). Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech, 24, 207-221.

Brennan, E.M. , Ryan, E.B. and Dawson, W.E. ( 1975). Scaling of apparent accentedness by magnitude estimation and sensory modality matching. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 27-36.

Brouwer, D. and Hout, R. Van ( 1984). Amsterdam vernacular: The analysis of style shifting and covariation. In H. Bennis and W.U.S. van Lessen Kloeke (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (Dordrecht/Cinnaminson), pp. 33-43.

Chambers, J.K. and Trudgill, P. ( 1980). Dialectology (Cambridge).

Giles, H. ( 1972). The effect of stimulus mildness-broadness in the evaluation of accents. Language and Speech, 15, 262-269.

Giles, H. , Scherer, K.R. and Taylor, D.M. ( 1979). Speech markers in social interaction. In K.R. Scherer and H. Giles (eds.), Social Markers in Speech (London), pp. 343-381.

Gussenhoven, C. and Bremmer Jr., R.H. ( 1983). Voiced fricatives in Dutch: Sources and present-day usage . North-Western European Language Evolution, 2, 55-71.

10.

Hout, R. Van ( 1978). Het trekken van steekproeven in sociolinguistisch onderzoek . Mededelingen van de Nijmeegse Centrale voor Dialect- en Naamkunde, 16, 47-93.

11.

Hout, R. Van ( 1979). Kennis van een dialect: Norm en regel. Gramma, 3, 135-157.

12.

Hout, R. Van ( 1984a). Sociolinguistics in the Netherlandic language area. In K. Deprez (ed.), Sociolinguistics in the Low Countries (Amsterdam), pp. 1-41.

13.

Hout, R. Van ( 1984b). The need for a theory of choice in sociolinguistics . Linguistische Berichte, 90, 39-57.

14.

Hudson, R.A. ( 1980). Sociolinguistics (Cambridge).

15.

Labov, W. ( 1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City (Washington, D.C.).

16.

Labov, W. ( 1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns (Philadelphia).

17.

Ma, R. and Herasimschuk, E. ( 1972). Speech styles in Puerto Rican bilingual speakers . In J. Fishman (ed.), Advances in the Sociology of Language, Vol. II (The Hague / Paris), pp. 268-295.

18.

Ryan, E.B. ( 1973). Subjective reactions toward accented speech. In R.W. Shuy and R.W. Fasold (eds.), Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects (Washington D.C.), pp. 60-73.

19.

Sankoff, D. and Laberge, S. ( 1978). Statistical dependence among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In D. Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods (New York), pp. 119-126.

20.

Terpstra, L.C.P. ( 1952). Het Nijmeegse uitstralingsgebied van de stemloze f, s, sj en ch. Taal en Tongval, 4, 101-115.

21.

Thelander, M. ( 1982). A qualitative approach to quantitative data of speech variation. In S. Romaine (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation in Speech Communities (London), pp. 65-84.

22.

Trudgill, P. ( 1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich (London) .

23.

Weinreich, U. , Labov, W. and Herzog, W. ( 1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change . In. W.P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics (Austin), pp. 95-188.

24.

Westerlaak, J.M. Van , Kropman, J.A. and Collaris, J.W.M. ( 1975). Beroepenklapper. Internal publication of the Institute for Applied Sociology, Nijmegen.