Two experiments were conducted with the purpose of investigating the ability of right- and left-hemisphere-damaged individuals to produce and perceive the acoustic correlates to phrase boundaries. In the production experiment, the utterance pink and black and green was elicited in three different conditions corresponding to different arrangements of colored squares. Acoustic analyses revealed that both left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients exhibited fewer of the expected acoustic patterns in their productions than did normal control subjects. The reduction in acoustic cues to phrase boundaries in the utterances of both patient groups was perceptually salient to three trained listeners. The perception experiment demonstrated a significant impairment in the ability of both left-hemisphere-damaged and right-hemisphere-damaged individuals to perceive phrasal groupings. Results are discussed in relation to current hypotheses concerning the cerebral lateralization of speech prosody.
BAUM, S. (1992). The influence of word length on syllable duration in aphasia: acoustic analyses. Aphasiology, 6(5), 501–513.
2.
BAUM, S. (1993). An acoustic analysis of rate of speech effects on vowel production in aphasia. Brain and Language, 44, 414–430.
3.
BAUM, S., BLUMSTEIN, S., NAESER, M., & PALUMBO, C. (1990). Temporal dimensions of consonant and vowel production: An acoustic and CT scan analysis of aphasic speech. Brain & Language, 39, 33–56.
4.
BAUM, S., KELSCH DANILOFF, J., DANILOFF, R., & LEWIS, J. (1982). Sentence comprehension by Broca's aphasics: Effects of some suprasegmental variables. Brain and Language, 17, 261–271.
5.
BAUM, S., & PELL, M. (1997). Production of affective and linguistic prosody by brain-damaged patients. Aphasiology, 11, 177–198.
6.
BAUM, S., & PELL, M. (in press). The neural bases of prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. In M. Lynch (Ed.), The cognitive science of prosody: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
7.
BAUM, S., & RYAN, L. (1993). Rate of speech effects in aphasia: Voice onset time. Brain and Language, 44, 431–445.
8.
BEACH, C., KATZ, W., & SKOWRONSKI, A. (1996). Children's processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1148–1160.
9.
BEHRENS, S. (1985). The perception of stress and lateralization of prosody. Brain and Language, 26, 332–348.
10.
BEHRENS, S. (1988). The role of the right hemisphere in the production of linguistic stress. Brain and Language, 33, 104–127.
11.
BEHRENS, S. (1989). Characterizing sentence intonation in a right hemisphere-damaged population. Brain and Language, 37, 181–200.
12.
BLONDER, L., PICKERING, J., HEATH, R., SMITH, C., & BUTLER, S. (1995). Prosodic characteristics of speech pre- and post-right hemisphere stroke. Brain & Language, 51, 318–335.
13.
BLUMSTEIN, S. (1991). Phonological aspects of aphasia. In M. T. Sarno (ed.), Acquired Aphasia.San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
14.
BLUMSTEIN, S., & BAUM, S. (1987). Consonant production deficits in aphasia. In J. Ryalls (ed.), Phonetic approaches to speech production in aphasia and related disorders (pp. 3–22). Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
15.
BLUMSTEIN, S., & COOPER, W. (1974). Hemispheric processing of intonation contours. Cortex, 10, 146–158.
16.
BRÅDVIK, B., DRAVINS, C., HOLTÅS, S., ROSÉN, I., RYDING, E., & INGVAR, D. (1991). Disturbances of speech prosody following right hemisphere infarcts. Acta Neurologica Scandanivica, 84(2), 114–126.
17.
BRYAN, K. (1989). Language prosody and the right hemisphere. Aphasiology, 3(4), 285–299.
18.
CANCELLIERE, A., & KERTESZ, A. (1990). Lesion localization in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension. Brain and Cognition, 13, 133–147.
19.
CAPLAN, D. (1992). Language: Structure, process, and disorders.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
COOPER, W., PACCIA, J., & LAPOINTE, S. (1978). Hierarchical coding in speech timing. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 154–177.
21.
COOPER, W., SOARES, C., NICOL, J., MICHELOW, D., & GOLOSKIE, S. (1984). Clausal intonation after unilateral brain damage. Language and Speech, 27, 17–24.
22.
COOPER, W., & SORENSEN, J. (1981). Fundamental frequency in sentence production.New York: Springer Verlag.
23.
DANLY, M., COOPER, W., & SHAPIRO, B. (1983). Fundamental frequency, language processing, and linguistic structure in Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 19, 1–24.
24.
DANLY, M., & SHAPIRO, B. (1982). Speech prosody in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 171–190.
25.
DYKSTRA, K., GANDOUR, J., & STARK, R. (1995). Disruption of prosody after frontal lobe seizures in the nondominant hemisphere. Aphasiology, 9, 453–476.
26.
EMMOREY, K. (1987). The neurological substrates for prosodic aspects of speech. Brain and Language, 30(2), 305–320.
27.
GANDOUR, J., & DARDARANANDA, R. (1983). Identification of tonal contrasts in Thai aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 18, 98–114.
28.
GANDOUR, J., DECHONGKIT, S., PONGLORPISIT, S., & KHUNADORN, F. (1994). Speech timing at the sentence level in Thai after unilateral brain damage. Brain & Language, 46, 419–438.
29.
GANDOUR, J., DECHONGKIT, S., PONGLORPISIT, S., KHUNADORN, F., & BOONGIRD, P. (1993). Intraword timing relations in Thai after unilateral brain damage. Brain and Language, 45, 160–179.
30.
GANDOUR, J., LARSEN, J., DECHONGKIT, S., PONGLORPISIT, S., & KHUNADORN, F. (1995). Speech prosody in affective contexts in Thai patients with right hemisphere lesions. Brain and Language, 51, 422–443.
31.
GANDOUR, J., PONGLORPISIT, S., KHUNADORN, F., DECHONGKIT, S., BOONGIRD, P., & BOONKLAM, R. (1992a). Lexical tones in Thai after unilateral brain damage. Brain and Language, 43, 275–307.
32.
GANDOUR, J., PONGLORPISIT, S., KHUNADORN, F., DECHONGKIT, S., BOONGIRD, P., BOONKLAM, R., & POTISUK, S. (1992b). Lexical tones in Thai after unilateral brain damage. Brain and Language, 43, 275–307.
33.
GAUTHIER, L., DEHAUT, F., & JOANETTE, Y. (1989). The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 49–54.
34.
GOODGLASS, H., & KAPLAN, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders.Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
35.
GROSJEAN, F., & HIRT, C. (1996). Using prosody to predict the end of sentences in English and French: Normal and brain-damaged subjects. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 107–134.
36.
HEILMAN, K., BOWERS, D., SPEEDIE, L., & COSLETT, H. (1984). Comprehension of affective and nonaffective prosody. Neurology, 34, 917–920.
37.
KATZ, W., BEACH, C., JENOURI, K., & VERMA, S. (1996). Duration and fundamental frequency correlates of phrase boundaries in productions by children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3179–3191.
38.
KENT, R., & ROSENBEK, J. (1983). Acoustic patterns of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 26, 231–248.
39.
KLATT, D. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 129–140.
40.
LADD, D.R. (1988). Declination “reset” and the hierarchical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 530–544.
41.
LANCKER, D. Van. (1980). Cerebral lateralization of pitch cues in the linguistic signal. International Journal of Human Communication, 13(2), 227–277.
42.
LANCKER, D. Van, & SIDTIS, J. (1992). The identification of affective-prosodic stimuli by left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects: All errors are not created equal. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 963–970.
43.
LEHISTE, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 107–122.
44.
LEHISTE, I., OLIVE, J., & STREETER, L. (1976). Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1199–1202.
45.
McNEIL, M., LISS, J., TSENG, C.-H., & KENT, R. (1990). Effects of speech rate on the absolute and relative timing of apraxic and conduction aphasic sentence production. Brain & Language, 38, 135–158.
46.
MERTUS, J. (1989). BLISS User's Manual. Providence: Brown University.
47.
OUELLETTE, G., & BAUM, S. (1993). Acoustic analysis of prosodic cues in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Aphasiology, 8(3), 257–283.
48.
PELL, M. (1997). An acoustic characterization of speech prosody in right-hemisphere-damaged patients: Interactive effects of focus distribution, sentence modality, and emotional context. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
49.
PELL, M., & BAUM, S. (1997). The ability to perceive and comprehend intonation in linguistic and affective contexts by brain damaged adults. Brain and Language, 57, 80–99.
50.
PERKINS, J., BARAN, J., & GANDOUR, J. (1996). Hemispheric specialization in processing intonation contours. Aphasiology, 10, 343–362.
51.
PRICE, P., OSTENDORF, M., SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S., & FONG, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956–2970.
52.
RYALLS, J. (1982). Intonation in Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 20(3), 355–360.
53.
RYALLS, J., JOANETTE, Y., & FELDMAN, L. (1987). An acoustic comparison of normal and right-hemisphere-damaged speech prosody. Cortex, 23, 685–694.
54.
SCOTT, D. (1982). Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 996–1007.
55.
SHAPIRO, B., & DANLY, M. (1985). The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts. Brain and Language, 25, 19–36.
56.
STREETER, L. (1978). Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1582–1592.
57.
't HART, J., & COHEN, A. (1973). Intonation by rule: A perceptual quest. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 309–327.
58.
WEINTRAUB, S., MESULAM, M. -M., & KRAMER, L. (1981). Disturbances in prosody: A right-hemisphere contribution to language. Archives of Neurology, 38, 742–744.
59.
WIGHTMAN, C., SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S., OSTENDORF, M., & PRICE, P. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1707–1717.
60.
WIIG, E., & SECORD, W. (1987). Test of Language Competence---Expanded Edition.San Antonio, TX: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich, Inc.
