Abstract
This paper addresses the current medico-legal issues surrounding PVS (Permanent Vegetative State), including: the lack of a unified definition of the acronym PVS, the varying criteria for diagnosis of PVS, and the issue of patients who maintain a minimal degree of consciousness and cannot be categorized as PVS patients. First, we analyse the differing medical definitions and criteria for diagnosis in vegetative conditions. We also ask what part ‘consciousness’ plays in treatment decisions made by the family, the healthcare team, and the courts, by analysing a unique Irish case of a patient in a state deemed by the courts as ‘near PVS’. The paper demonstrates that there is now a legal dichotomy in vegetative patients. However, the manner in which the court treated these patients is the same. Underlying this discussion we hope to demonstrate how medical practice is subject to legal decisions and thus the importance of establishing uniform medical guidelines to assist the nonmedical professional.