Abstract
The informal status of a patient is a very important topic because the vast majority of mental patients in hospital are informal. The origins of the status are traced to the Royal Commissions of 1924–6 and 1954–7 which recommended voluntary admissions and informal admissions, respectively. It is pointed out, inter alia, that it is only generally true to say the informal patient has consented to admission and cannot be treated without his or her consent because exceptionally he or she can be given such treatment, e.g. on the grounds of necessity, as held by the House of Lords in R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health Trust (1998) and that today there are two types of informal patients: those who can, and do, consent to admission, and those who cannot consent to admission, but do not show willingness to leave hospital.
It is argued that there is only a power under the Mental Health Act 1983 to admit patients informally. Finally, the informal patient's consent to admission, consent to treatment, other rights, leaving hospital, and how his or her position can be improved are looked at.