Abstract
A diagnosis of drowning is a challenge in legal medicine, as there is generally a lack of pathognomonic findings indicative of drowning. Diatom analysis has been considered very supportive for a diagnosis of drowning, although the test is still controversial for some investigators. We assessed diatoms association with drowning in the peripheral tissues of drowned rats and the effects of the drowning medium on the diatom yield. A modified acid digestion method was optimised for diatom recovery in water and rat tissues. Eighteen adult Wistar rats were employed for the study, subdivided into six groups of three rats. Groups 1, 3 and 5 were drowned in seawater, lake water, or river water respectively, while groups 2, 4 and 6 were controls (immersed after death in seawater, lake water or river water respectively). Water samples were taken from the sea, lake and river in Málaga and Córdoba (Spain) for the purposes of diatomological mapping and drowning of the rats. Diatoms were successfully recovered from all water samples and matched with tissues of the drowned rats. There were significant differences in diatom numbers between control and test samples for all the tissues studied, as well as within test samples. Histological investigations conducted on lung samples obtained from drowned rats provided complementary and valuable information. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the diatom test as a reliable method for the diagnosis of drowning, especially if adequate precautions are taken to avoid contamination, and if interpretation of the analysis is performed in light of other complementary investigations.
Introduction
When bodies are retrieved from water, the usual questions asked are whether the person died from drowning or from other causes while in the water, or if the body was submerged after death. Drowning is an asphyxial death caused by respiratory impairment from submersion/immersion in a fluid, whether or not the fluid is aspirated into the lungs. Its diagnosis, however, is still a very difficult task in legal medicine. 1 It lacks pathognomonic autopsy findings that are diagnostic of drowning. 2 Several authors have postulated various diagnostic tests, most of which are merely suggestive or supportive of the diagnosis. There are four main objective data sources that can be examined for the diagnosis of drowning: autopsy findings, chemical markers, microscopic/histologic findings and diatom analysis.
At autopsy, drowning decedents may show frothing in the mouth, nostrils and airways, oedematous and heavy lungs, emphysema (inflation), sub-pleural petechiae, water in the nasal sinuses, and pleural effusion. Nevertheless, signs of drowning are scanty and not absolutely specific. Furthermore, these signs may be lost when a considerable period has elapsed between death and retrieval of the body. 3 It is also not uncommon to observe microscopic findings in the lungs that include intracellular swelling, emphysema aquosum, rupture of terminal air spaces, alveolar dilatation, thinning of inter-alveolar septa, a marked increase in alveolar macrophages, and increased phagocytic activity. 4 Chemical ion markers such as chloride, strontium, magnesium and iron concentrations have been investigated for evidence of haemodilution and haemoconcentration. For instance, Gettler 5 suggested that in freshwater drowning, chloride ion concentration was diagnostic of haemodilution if the difference between the right and left ventricles was >25 mg/100 mL blood, although this finding has been refuted by others. 6 This test is flawed by a lack of sensitivity and limited by putrefactive changes. Azparren et al. 7 suggested that blood strontium was diagnostic of haemoconcentration in seawater drowning if the concentration difference was more than 75 µg/L. Recently, Pérez-Cárceles et al. 8 found that strontium was the best serum trace element for the diagnosis of drowning in seawater (significantly higher in the left ventricle than in the right). The drawbacks, however, include the non-specificity of the tests and differences in strontium levels in seawater of varying salinity and at different locations.
The diatom test has been proposed as a marker for the diagnosis of drowning. It may be especially useful for the diagnosis of drowning in putrefied bodies which are impossible to diagnose anatomically and useful for the ecological mapping in relation to the water types and locations.3,9,10 The test is based on the theory that it is possible to recover diatoms in the peripheral organs of drowned decedents if they aspirated water containing diatoms into the lungs which eventually enter the blood circulation.
Since the first discovery of diatoms in the lungs by Hofmann in 1896 and its diagnostic use by Revenstorf in 1904, the method has been used and improved over the years. The test, however, is not without controversy. Some authors11–13 question its reliability, as it is prone to contamination due to the ubiquitous nature of diatoms. Moreover, the possibility of diatoms entering the body through the intestinal tract into the bloodstream has also been proposed.
Our study aimed to establish evidence of a diatom association with drowning by conducting drowning and non-drowning experiments in rats to investigate the effects of water type on diatom recovery.
Materials and methods
Water samples
Samples of water were obtained from three sites between 8 February and 27 April 2013: the Mediterranean Sea at San Luis de Sabinillas, Manilva, Málaga, Spain; Lake Navallana in Alcolea, Córdoba, Spain; and River Guadalquivir in Córdoba, Spain. Samples were obtained with plastic bottles from the seashore and close to the banks of the lake and river respectively. The water samples were used for diatomological mapping of the three sites and the drowning experiments.
Experimental series of animals
Eighteen adult Wistar rats (average weight 453.9 ± 52.6 g) were randomly assigned to one of six groups, each consisting of three animals: Group 1, drowned in seawater; Group 2, control post-mortem submersion in seawater; Group 3, drowned in lake water; Group 4, control post-mortem submersion in lake water; Group 5, drowned in river water; and Group 6, control post-mortem submersion in river water. The rats were maintained under the same laboratory conditions at the School of Medicine, University of Córdoba, under the supervision of an animal technician prior to the experiment.
Batch drowning was conducted according to the allocated groups. Groups 1, 3 and 5 were drowned in seawater, lake water or river water respectively. Each allocated rat was caged and completely submerged in a plastic container filled with water.
The control groups (2, 4 and 6) were anaesthetised by injection with ketamine 75 mg/kg (Imalgene 100 mg/mL; Merial Laboratorios, Lyon, France) and sacrificed by elongation of the cervical spine before submersion in the water. All drowning/submersion procedures were performed at room temperature for a total period of 30 minutes with intermittent movement of the water to ensure adequate interaction between the diatom-rich water and the submerged rats.
The rats were washed thoroughly with deionised water prior to necropsy. Cross-contamination was prevented by using separate sets of surgical instruments for the dissection of external and internal organs for each rat, and all excised tissues were washed with diatom-free deionised water before storage in sterile capped tubes for freezing.
Approximately 10 g of muscle from the superior portion of the posterior limbs and whole samples of liver, kidneys, spleen, lungs, brain and one femur were placed in 15 mL plastic capped tubes and frozen at −21℃. A part of the lung was removed and fixed in diatom-free 10% saline-buffered formalin solution for histological examinations.
Acid digestion of tissues
The criteria for selecting the best digestion method were based on the cleanest sample with least organic matter, integrity of the diatom frustules, high diatom density and availability of diagnostic features for species identification. The optimum procedure was determined by the modification of generally accepted and widely reported methods in the literature.3,14,15
Method development and optimisation.
Optimum conditions achieved.
Fifty µL of well-mixed final cleaned sample was pipetted onto the coverslip (24 mm × 60 mm) and dried on a slide warmer (50–60℃) and mounted. A smear of nail polish was applied to the edges of a clean pre-labelled slide (26 mm × 76 mm) and coverslips were mounted on the slide with the sample side down and pressed gently. Diatoms were examined using an optical microscope fitted with high definition camera (Nikon Eclipse E1000, Tokyo, Japan) at 40× magnification for diatom count and 100× magnification for diatom identification, both in the water samples and tissue samples.
Diatom quantitation and statistical tools
Diatoms were identified and classified by comparison with the available literature.16–18 Diatoms were counted and measured by using the Image-Pro plus v4.5.0.29 imaging software. This program was used to assist the observer in the counting and measuring process, who was blind to the samples. Destroyed diatoms were included in the count if more than half of the frustule was still intact.
Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and STATA applications. Statistical tools employed included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in order to choose the cut-off points, and a non-parametric test such as Kruskal–Wallis one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann–Whitney rank sum test or Tukey’s test for the experimental samples. We considered statistically significant differences at p < .05.
Histological analysis
Lung samples were fixed in 10% saline-buffered formalin and paraffin embedded. Sections 6 µm thick were obtained and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) for light microscope studies under bright-field illumination on a Nikon Eclipse 1000 microscope coupled with a high-definition camera at magnifications of 10× and 40×. The histologists responsible for the analysis were blinded to the groups.
Ethical issues
The experiment was performed according to the Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and was ethically approved by the University of Córdoba bioethics committee before commencement.
Results
Numbers, sizes and types of diatoms in water samples
The ranges of diatom counts per 50 µL pellet of Lake Navallana, River Guadalquivir and the Mediterranean Sea samples collected between the 8 and 14 February 2013 were 97–200 (150 ± 67), 597–859 (700 ± 313) and 166–1007 (404 ± 181) frustules, respectively. Diatom counts from samples collected on 27 April 2013 were 291–459 (354 ± 56) for the lake; 18–123 (50 ± 23) for the river; and 128–239 (183 ± 82) diatom frustules/50 µL for the sea. These counts demonstrated a considerable decrease in sea and river counts between the two different sampling periods; the lake, however, showed an increase in the diatom count.
Diatom sizes for the lake, river and sea from the first sampling period (8–14 February) were 57.53 ± 47.27 µm, 9.73 ± 5.17 µm and 8.50 ± 4.91 µm, respectively. The second batch (collected on 27 April) contained diatoms with sizes of 52.51 ± 46.05 µm, 39.27 ± 23.92 µm and 7.62 ± 6.23 µm respectively for lake, river and sea. This indicates fairly larger diatom sizes in the lake samples relative to the sea and river. A decrease in diatom size was observed between the two sampling periods in the lake and river. The sea, however, showed a considerable increase in diatom sizes within the same period.
Sea samples contained characteristic centric and pennate diatoms predominantly Cyclotella sp, Nitzschia sp, Navicula sp, Cymbella sp and Lyrella sp. Also, lake diatoms consisted predominantly of Nitzschia sp, Navicula sp, Melosira roseana, Gomphoneis herculeana and Gomphonema sp. Diatoms recovered from the river samples were mainly Gomphonema sp, Suriella sp, Amphora sp, Bacillaria sp, Synedra sp and Fragilaria sp.
Diatom quantitation in animal tissues
Diatom numbers per 50 µL recovered from rat tissue samples.
aGroups 1 (G1), 3 (G3) and 5 (G5) refer to test rats drowned in seawater, lake water or river water respectively.
Groups 2 (G2), 4 (G4) and 6 (G6) refer to control rats submerged in seawater, lake water or river water respectively.

Light microscope photographs of some diatoms recovered from (a) liver (Orthoseira Americana), (b) and (f) spleen (Coconeis sp and Aulacoseira sp respectively), (c) and (e) lung (Nitzschia sp) and (d) kidney (Fragilaria crotonensis) in test groups. Magnification: 100×.
Our study adopted a cut-off value for classifying diatom count as positive based on a ROC curve. A minimum of four diatoms/50 µL in the lungs (sensitivity: 89%; specificity: 78%) and one diatom/50 µL in other organs (sensitivity and specificity: 100%) were accepted.
Mann–Whitney rank sum test of control and test samples.
For p < .05, the difference in the median values between the two groups is greater than would be expected by chance; there is a statistically significant difference.
The Kruskal–Wallis test and Tukey’s test also demonstrated general and specific differences in diatom numbers between the drowned tissue samples (p < .05), indicating a significant difference in diatom numbers between the lungs and the other organs observed, except for muscle and spleen.
Estimated diatom sizes recovered from rat tissues were 19.0 ± 13.5 µm for the sea, 33.7 ± 26.4 µm for the lake and 38.6 ± 32.8 µm for the river.
Histological findings
Histological analysis was performed on lung samples of test and control rats in seawater and freshwater.
Sea control samples
The most striking findings were inflammatory infiltrates perivascularly and in the alveolar interstitium. In some zones, the alveoli were collapsed with congestive vessels (see Figure 2).
Control sample (seawater) with (a) perivascular and (b) interstitial infiltration of inflammatory cells and macrophages. Control sample (freshwater) with some ruptured walls, dilated alveoli, and perivascular and interstitial infiltration (c) and thickening of the alveolar septa showing intra-alveolar diatom (d). Stain: Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Magnification: (a) 10×, (b) 40×, (c) 10× and (d) 40×.
Fresh control samples
The findings were similar to those in the control sea group (inflammatory infiltrates around vessels and in the interstitium). Nevertheless, in some cases, dilated alveoli, ruptured walls, thickening of the alveolar septa and reduction of the intra-alveolar space were observed (see Figure 2).
Sea test samples
The most remarkable findings were intra-alveolar haemorrhages and emphysema aquosum, with rupture of several alveolar walls and flattened inter-alveolar septa. Perivascular and intra-alveolar spaces infiltration of inflammatory cells and macrophages were noticeable, as well as foreign material in alveolar spaces, probably algae and diatoms (see Figure 3)
Test sample (seawater). Rupture of alveolar walls and flattened inter-alveolar septa (a); inflammatory infiltrate around vessels (b); many macrophages infiltration into alveolar spaces (c); and foreign material in alveolar space (d) and (e), probably algae and diatoms. Stain: H&E. Magnification: (a) 10× and (b)–(e) 40×.
Fresh test samples
The changes observed were similar to those in the drowning sea cases – intra-alveolar haemorrhage and emphysema aquosum. There was also inflammatory cell infiltrates mainly inter-alveolar, with increasing numbers of macrophages within alveolar spaces, some of them pigmented with hemosiderin.
Discussion
Diatom counts in water samples varied between the two sampling periods with a decrease in diatom numbers in the sea and river samples but an increase in the lake samples. For diatom sizes, the river samples were the smallest for both sampling periods.
Analysis of the water samples indicated larger numbers of intact diatoms recovered in the river and lake compared to the sea. The considerable destruction of sea diatom frustules has been observed by other authors who employed alternative methods.14,20,21 This phenomenon had been attributed to thinner and less resistant siliceous cell walls of sea diatoms, rendering them fragile and vulnerable to harsher treatments. 21 The number of diatoms recovered and identified is influenced by the sampling location, digestion method and microscopic magnification.22,23 Moreover, the variations in diatom counts from the same location are affected by the tidal flow of the sea, conditions of the river and lake, and prevailing changes in weather conditions such as the onset of rainfall. 24 This is in accordance with the findings of our study, suggesting that the changes in diatom numbers and sizes were influenced by changes in weather conditions, especially the onset of rainfall during the collection periods.
In relation to the diatoms recovered from rat tissues, the experiment detected the highest diatom counts and largest sized diatoms in tissues from lake water. Conversely, the tissues from seawater yielded low diatom counts and the smallest sizes. The ability of diatoms to percolate the alveolar walls of the lungs into pulmonary circulation has been attributed to size and morphology. 21 The considerable reduction in diatom counts in test sea samples, despite their relatively small sizes, supports the assertion that perhaps most of the diatom frustules were destroyed by the acid digestion method.
The results generally showed low diatom counts in the tissues of control rats. The numbers of the diatoms counted in test samples ranged from 10 to 221 frustules/50 µL, while those in control (post-mortem submersion) samples ranged from 0 to 5. Furthermore, all the diatoms observed in the tissues of control rats were in the lungs. It was notable that all diatoms in tissues matched the respective drowning media. We want to highlight the fact that the observer was blind to the samples in order to avoid a bias.
A common trend observed was that samples with a positive diatom count for organs such as the kidney, liver, muscle, femur, brain and spleen also showed a positive diatom count for the lungs. Conversely, samples with no diatoms in the lungs did not have any diatoms in the other organs either. This trend was observed by Auer and Möttönen 14 when they performed a diatom analysis using 107 human cadavers.
In this study, we adopted a cut-off value for classifying diatom counts as positive based on a ROC curve. A minimum of four diatoms/50 µL in the lungs and one diatom/50 µL in other organs were accepted, according to our experimental conditions. These values are slightly different from other studies.3,25 However, this study adopted a different criterion for diatom counts in tissue samples. This was due to the different parameters such as the smaller mass (3 g samples) and volume (50 µL pellet) of sample used.
Two of nine (22%) control samples were positive for diatoms in the lungs based on the cut-off values used in this study. The numbers, though not high, are important, as they may affect the interpretation of drowning cases. One of the main challenges in the inclusion of lungs for diagnosis of drowning is the possibility of passive movement of water into the lungs.25–27 It is therefore not the best tissue for diatom analysis, and requires other peripheral organs for more reliable interpretation. This study tested for significant differences between diatom numbers in the tissues of control and test rats using the Mann–Whitney rank sum test. The test revealed a significant difference (p < .05) between the diatom numbers in the lungs and other tissues of control and test rats. In doubtful cases, when organs contained only a few diatoms, or when the density of diatoms was low in water at discovery sites, we could use an additional confirmatory method, such as bacterioplankton detected by PCR, which provides important information about the type of aspirated water.28
Macroscopic and histological findings in the test samples indicated some classical signs of asphyxia, mainly sub-pleural haemorrhages, pulmonary congestion and oedema, though these are mostly non-specific findings of death. The histological findings were mostly similar to those published in the literature for the diagnosis of the ‘drowned lung’, 4 such as emphysema aquosum, thinning and tearing of the alveolar septa, intra-alveolar haemorrhages, and a leading amount of macrophages within alveolar spaces, some of them pigmented with hemosiderin (the latter more evident in freshwater samples). Some results, however, were difficult to interpret, such as some emphysema in control samples (although some authors have claimed that this change can result simply from the hydrostatic pressure caused by submersion in a water depth of 4 m or more in humans), 29 and even the presence of pigmented macrophages (probably haemosiderin is a finding not related to drowning because the short period between submersion and death does not permit this change to be activated). Also, perivascular and interstitial inflammatory infiltrates were noticed in both control and test samples. We observed some foreign material, including probable algae, and diatoms in the intra-alveolar spaces in both control and test samples.
The above-described findings indicate vital submersion and support a diagnosis of drowning in test samples, even though there were diatoms in the histological lung slides of both test and control samples.
Conclusions
This study was successful in using diatom analysis to differentiate drowning from post-mortem submersion in rats. Diatom counts in the control and test groups statistically differentiated the two. Moreover, the diatom yield depended on the technique used, including the tissue size, digestion method and counting method. It also is important to use condition-dependent cut-off values. Finally, the interpretation of the analysis in conjunction with other tests in a contamination-free environment produces reliable results.
A few recommendations include: contamination should be avoided as much as possible, tissues used should be adequate, and alternative less-harsh techniques should be used to analyse seawater diatoms. Finally, lungs should be assessed for diatoms together with other organs.
Limitations of the study
There were specific setbacks and challenges which included the limited sample size used for the experiment. Three rats per experimental group seem inadequate to show outcome patterns exhaustively. Moreover, most of the organs used, including the brain, kidney and spleen, were of low quantity (weight).
Footnotes
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
