Abstract
Blood screening conducted on Singaporeans over 1991–1992 showed exposure to predominately aflatoxin B1 and to a lesser extent G1.
The extent of exposure to B1 among three groups of residents in Singapore, namely normal subjects (n = 423), hepatitis B virus carriers (n = 302) and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC) patients (n = 58) were extensive as reflected by the positive rates of 15.1, 0.7 and 1.7 per cent respectively. However, the degree of individual exposure to this toxin among the three groups was considered low as shown by the low respective mean blood levels of 5.4 ± 3.2 (range 3.0–17), 7.7 (range 7.5–7.9) and 7.5 picogrammes per ml of blood. It is not immediately clear whether or not such low levels would precipitate an undesirable health effect. The higher positive rate seen in normal subjects as compared with the other groups could be due to differences in dietary intake of aflatoxin B1, differences in metabolic patterns or both. About 70 per cent of PHC patients studied were carriers.
The degree of aflatoxin B1 exposure among normal subjects in Singapore was a factor of 22.1 times less than that in Japan, 40.9 times less than that in Indonesia and 51.3 times less than that in the Philippines. Similarly, the extent of exposure among hepatitis B carriers in Singapore was a factor of 8.2 times, 39.6 times and 24.2 times less than those in the other three Asiatic countries respectively. The results reflected stringent Government control over the quality of food stuff imported into this country. As Singapore imports almost all its dietary needs from elsewhere, it can afford to be selective at a cost.
Aflatoxin M1, a metabolite of B1, was most commonly encountered in the liver tissues of deceased (n = 154) who died of causes other than sickness or disease in 1992–93, consistent with our blood findings of prevalence of aflatoxin Bl.
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection using one of the aflatoxins G2 or B2 as an internal standard was used for the detection and quantification of aflatoxins. The use of an internal standard structurally and chemically similar to those required to be quantified minimizes errors in quantifications. This is because differences in the quenching of fluorescence between specimen extracts and spiked-standard extracts were internally standardized and compensated for. The presence of an internal standard also helped to locate aflatoxins of interest more accurately.
Strict decontamination procedures for cleaning glassware and apparatus were adhered to, to reduce cross-contaminations.
Only duplicate-positive results were taken to be positive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.