Using a unique data set from the US to examine the association between employment
stability and childcare stability, we find that childcare use is fairly stable for
current and former welfare recipients. In addition, although childcare instability
contributes to employment instability, it does not appear to be the major reason
women leave their jobs. In this case, employment retention programmes in the US,
while not losing focus on childcare issues, should also address other barriers to
keeping jobs, such as limited education and lack of work experience.
Blau, D.
and
Robins, P.
(1991a),
‘Turnover in child care arrangements’
, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73,
1, pp.
152-157
.
2.
Blau, D.
and
Robins, P.
(1991b),
‘Child care demand and labor supply of young mothers over time’
, Demography, 28, 3, pp.
333-351
.
3.
Blau, D.
and
Robins, P.
(1998),
‘A dynamic analysis of turnover in employment and child care’
, Demography, 35, 1, pp.
83-96
.
4.
Bloom, D.
,
Anderson, J.
,
Wavelet, M.
,
Gardiner, K.N.
and
Fishman, M.E.
(2002a), New Strategies to Promote Stable Employment and
Career Progression: An Introduction to the Employment Retention and Advancement
Project,
US Department of Health and Human Services
.
5.
Bloom, D.
,
Kemple, J.
,
Morris, P.
,
Scrivener, S.
,
Verma, N.
and
Hendra, R.
(2002b), The Family Transition Programme: Final Report on
Florida’s Initial Time-Limited Welfare Programme,
New York, MDRC
.
6.
Bloom, D.
,
Scrivener, S.
,
Michalopoulos, C.
,
Morris, P.
,
Hendra, R.
,
Adams-Ciardullo, D.
and
Walter, J.
(2002), Jobs First: Final Report on Connecticut’s
Welfare Reform Initiative,
New York, MDRC
.
7.
Francesconi, M.
and
Van der Klaauw, W.
(2004), ‘The socioeconomic consequences of
‘in-work’ benefit reform for British lone
mothers’,
mimeo, University of Essex
.
8.
Fuller, B.
,
Kagan, S.
,
Caspary, G.
and
Gauthier, C.
(2002),
‘Welfare reform and child care options for low-income families’
, Future of Children12(1).
9.
Gennetian, L.
and
Michalopoulos, C.
(2003), ‘Child care and employment: evidence from
random assignment studies of welfare and work programmes’, Next
Generation Working Paper No. 17,
New York, MDRC
.
10.
Gennetian, L.
and
Miller, C.
(2000), Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work: Final Report on
the Minnesota Family Investment Programme: Volume 2: Effects on Children,
New York, MDRC
.
11.
Gennetian, L.
,
Morris, P.
and
Vargas, W.
(2001), ‘Dynamics of child care subsidy use under a
welfare reform policy’,
New York, MDRC
.
12.
Harries, T.
,
La Valle, I.
and
Dickens, S.
(2004), Childcare: How Local Markets Respond to National
Initiatives, Research Report RR526,
Department for Education and Skills
.
13.
Hayes, C.
,
Palmer, J.
and
Zaslow, M.
(1990), Who Cares for America’s Children? Child
Care Policy for the 1990s,
Washington, DC, The National Academy of
Sciences Press
.
14.
Hofferth, S.
,
Brayfield, A.
,
Deich, S.
and
Holcomb, P.
(1991), National Child Care Survey, 1990,
Washington, D.C., The Urban Institute
.
15.
Isaacs, J.
and
Lyon, M.
(2000), A Cross-State Examination of Families Leaving
Welfare: Findings from the ASPE-Funded Leavers Studies,
Division of Data and Technical Analysis, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services
.
16.
Knox, V.
,
Miller, C.
and
Gennetian, L.
(2000), Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work: A Summary of
the Final Report on the Minnesota Family Investment Programme,
New York, MDRC
.
17.
Millar, J.
and
Evans, M.
(eds) (2003), Lone Parents and Employment: International
Comparisons of What Works,
Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy
.
18.
Schumacher, R.
and
Greenberg, M.
(1999), ‘Child care after leaving welfare: early
evidence from state studies’,
Washington D.C., Center for Law and Social Policy
.
19.
Woodland, S.
,
Miller, M.
and
Tipping, S.
(2004), Repeat Study of Parents’ Demand for Child
Care, Research Report RR348,
Department for Education and Skills
.
