Abstract
The aims of this study were to explore whether student suicide reporting is consistent with media recommendations for suicide reporting; analyze public opinion and sentiments toward student suicide reports. A keyword search was performed on the WeiboReach platform. This study included 113 student suicide report posts and 176,262 readers’ comments on suicide news reports. Hierarchical generalized linear modeling was used to analyze the relationships between adherence to reporting recommendations and negative emotions in readers’ comments. None of the media reporting of student suicide was consistent with all of the media recommendations for suicide reporting. Netizens were less likely to post negative comments when the reports describe the suicide method used (OR 1.169, 95% CI 1.022∼1.337), and not specifying the cause of suicide was a protective factor for public negative emotion (OR 0.799, 95% CI 0.707, 0.905). The findings suggest improving responsible media reporting on student suicide to reduce negative public emotion.
Keywords
Introduction
Suicide is an important global public health problem. In 2019, suicide was the fourth-leading cause of death among young people aged 15–29, accounting for 1.3% of all deaths worldwide (The World Health Organization, 2021). A total of 37 suicides were reported in 11 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns from February to July 2020, and approximately one-third of the suicides were among students (Manzar et al., 2021). A survey of Chinese students aged 9–18 showed that approximately 32.09% of students had suicidal ideation (Tan et al., 2018). Among middle school students, 23.2% had nonsuicidal self-injury, and 3.2% attempted suicide (Liang et al., 2014). The incidence rates of suicidal ideation among college students are high (Mortier et al., 2018a, 2018b; Yao et al., 2014). Obviously, student suicides have become a public concern (Cheng et al., 2018).
The media can be a double-edged sword that can play a role in suicide prevention or increase the risk of suicide-related social media use behaviors (Choi & Noh, 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Unruh-Dawes et al., 2022). However, the majority of studies have concluded that there is a causal relationship between media coverage of suicides and actual suicide rates (Domaradzki, 2021). The WHO issued a recommendation list of “six don’ts and six dos” for media workers in suicide reporting in 2000 and revised it in 2017 (The World Health Organization, 2017). However, adherence to this recommendation has not been frequent (Arafat et al., 2021; Menon et al., 2020). Some scholars indicated that 51% of Chinese online media reports on suicides from 2015–2020 used sensational headlines, and 39% used photographs or videos of suicide sites/locations (Chu et al., 2021). Newspaper reporting of suicide in Kashmir during 2016–2020 barely adhered to the guidelines, with almost every report explicitly providing information about the identity of the deceased and almost none of the reports providing educational information related to suicide prevention (Shoib & Arafat, 2021). One study in Hong Kong found that inappropriate media coverage of student suicides, such as the release of photos and descriptions of suicide details that are not consistent with the WHO media guidelines, can increase suicidal ideation among adolescents, while student suicide rates can be reduced if the media reports more suicide prevention information (Cheng et al., 2018). Mainstream Chinese publishers most frequently reported suicide among youth (Lai et al., 2021). Some students with psychological disorders may be likely to generate suicidal ideation after harmful suicide exposure, which may lead to copycat behaviors. The adherence to media guidelines of student suicide reports in mainland China needs to be further discussed.
Audience Involvement and Media Reporting of Suicide
Audience involvement is an individual’s psychological relationship with a mediated persona—someone the individual does not know in any other way than through the media (Brown, 2015). Audience involvement with media persona involves four processes: transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship (Brown, 2015). During the process of transportation, audiences become emotionally and psychologically involved in both the narrative and with the characters in the narrative. For example, a study found that celebrity suicide deaths can lead to significant, national increases in internet search volumes for suicide-related terms for celebrities of high prominence (Ortiz et al., 2019). In the process of parasocial interaction, netizens interact with others, including by viewing event-related comments, posting personal opinions, discussing events with other netizens and discussing related people. The identification process occurs when individuals adopt the attitudes, values, and beliefs or behaviors of other individuals or groups (Kelman, 1961). The process of worship involves a strong love for the persona; thus, worship is a much stronger psychological relationship than parasocial interaction. When posters published media reports of student suicide, netizens could become involved in those narratives through the four processes. Netizens generate emotional responses, express their opinions, and even spread their emotions. Social networking sites would be used to grieve and shape a wide range of emotional flow (Akhther & Tetteh, 2023; Moore et al., 2019). If the media reporting of student suicide is too detailed, including the location of the suicide, the method of suicide, and personal information of the people who died by suicide, netizens are more willing to become involved in suicide reporting. They are more likely to identify with suicidal ideation or post negative content than to post supportive content (Guidry et al., 2021).
Suicide Reporting and Public Opinion
As China’s Internet penetration rates and the number of Internet users have increased, online media have developed rapidly. The production mode of news has also changed in on media, and Weibo has the greatest influence on the news production mode. In the era of fragmented information, Weibo has become the center of public opinion due to its characteristics, including timeliness, fragmentation, instantaneousness, interactivity and civilianization. There were 224 million daily active users in September 2020, which makes it recognized as one of the most popular social media platforms in China (Feng & Johansson, 2019; Sina Weibo Data Center, 2020). Sina Weibo can increase news sources and communication effects for suicide reports. In addition, it could cause subtle psychological emotions and facilitate the generation and dissemination of public opinion (Han et al., 2020; Su, 2019; Yi et al., 2022).
To our knowledge, few studies have explored the public response and psychological effects of online media reporting of suicidal behaviors. A qualitative study of a case of suicide in Estonia showed that public comments on suicide reports in the five major online media outlets included value judgments, risk and protective factors, and criticism of the media. The most common emotional orientations of the comments were angry (34.5%), sarcastic (24.7%) and neutral (23.3%) (Sisask et al., 2012). The public reactions and psychological impacts of online suicide reports may vary with the social identities of the bereaved. The communication effects of media reporting on suicide related to celebrities and students were higher than those of reporting on the general population (Chu et al., 2021). Some scholars focused on public expression and emotions toward celebrities and found that people tended to glorify celebrity suicide (Qianchao et al., 2021). Little is known about readers’ reactions to media reports of student suicide. A content analysis of comments about student suicide reports using a manual judgment method found that readers were negative and irrational (Chiang et al., 2021). However, public opinion and the factors influencing the public’s emotional responses to online social media reports of student suicide remain unclear in China.
This study applied text mining methods to focus on suicide posts on Sina Weibo among full student groups, from elementary students to those with doctoral degrees. We classified the quality of student suicide reports using manual coding and explored public opinion and emotional orientation by cluster analysis and sentiment analysis. We aimed to explore the emotional effects that student suicide may have on the public and then find appropriate strategies to prevent public negative sentiment toward student suicide reports.
Method
Collection Process of Online-Reported Student Suicide-Related Events
Data were derived from the Harbin Institute of Technology joint laboratory for social networks and a data mining research platform named WeiboReach, which is one of the most advanced new media (including Weibo, WeChat, and other online media) news propagation analysis tools in China. The events in the platform inclusion criteria included high spreading speed, maintaining a large communication effect over a long period, and generating buzz in online social media.
To obtain online-reported student suicide-related events, this study first determined 19 keywords based on a literature review and an integrated national mortality surveillance system for death registration and mortality surveillance in China (Liu et al., 2016; Meng et al., 2020). These keywords included suicide, to die by suicide, exclusion of homicide, hanging, charcoal burning (a method of suicide involving burning of barbecue charcoal in a confined space, leading to carbon monoxide poisoning), jumping from a building, high fall, slitting the wrist, lightheartedness, taking poison, suicide note, exclusion of criminal case (removing scenarios involving deaths resulting from criminal offenses such as intentional injury and manslaughter), jumping from a cliff, falling from a cliff, and drowning. This study applied these keywords in Chinese to obtain events in the Weibo Reach database from 2015 to January 2022 by a keyword maximization search method. A total of 318 events were obtained, and 167 events remained after removing duplicate events and rumors. Ultimately, this study analyzed 31 student suicides after screening whether each person who died by suicide was a student in the event overviews. The flow diagram is shown in Figure 1. This study selected 13 online suicide reported events of students in which the standardized event impact index (EII) exceeded 65 (Table 1). The detailed information of the EII could be referred in Supplementary Materials. Flow chat of this study, EII, Event Influence Index. The 13 Online-reported Suicide Events of Students (Sorted by the Event Impact Index).
Collection and Preprocessing of Corpus Data
Collection of Suicide Reports Corpus Data and Comments Corpus Data
This study used the above 13 online-reported suicide events of students as keywords to crawl all the search results by Python and GooSeeker, including the content of the posts, author of the post, number of likes, number of comments and number of forward. GooSeeker is a platform that offers web page crawling, information extraction, data extraction, data formatting, and data analysis capabilities (https://www.gooseeker.com/). The function of online data crawling has been well applied in previous studies (Bo & Di, 2020; Huang et al., 2021).
The posts needed to have some comments and spread effect; thus, this study set two standards: 1. number of comments ≥100; and 2. number of forwards ≥100. Posts meeting one or both criteria were included in this study. The posts were sorted according to the number of comments. According to the “top 10 effects” of public opinion in the cyberspace of mainland China, the opinions and comments of the top 10 netizens determine dozens or even hundreds of subsequent opinions and comments on certain news or social phenomena on the Internet, thus forming an online public opinion (Li & Yu, 2013). Thus, approximately 10 posts with the largest number of comments were selected for each event to form the student suicide report post corpus database. A total of 124 posts were obtained in this study.
All comments under each post in the suicide report post corpus database were crawled using GooSeeker to form the comment corpus database. Web crawler is an automated web browsing program capable of retrieving and collecting data from the Internet based on specific rules and algorithms. That is, this study collected all of the comments below the 124 posts of online-reported suicide events on Sina Weibo platform. Due to the long-time span, some bloggers had restricted the display of comments on Sina Weibo; thus, we were unable to obtain those Sina Weibo comments. Finally, a total of 176,262 comments from the 113 online suicide report posts were obtained.
Preprocessing of Student Suicide Posts and Comment Data
We used Python to conduct preprocessing, which included word separation and removing stop words. This study used the Jieba package to conduct word separation of the corpus. At present, the more commonly used Chinese stop words lists are the Chinese stop words list, Harbin University stop words list, and Sichuan University Machine Intelligence Lab stop words list. Then, we obtained the stop thesaurus by integrating and deduplicating these three stop word lists. This study removed the stop words after word segmentation.
Coding for Online Suicide Report Posts of Students
In 2017, the WHO updated its recommendations for the reporting of suicide in the media that included a list of six dos and six don’ts (Appendix table 1). We developed a coding scheme applicable to the online reporting of student suicide according to the list of six dos and six don’ts and the characteristics of media reporting on student suicide. There were 14 coding items and corresponding explanations in the coding scheme (Appendix Table 2). The correspondence between the 14 items and the six dos and don’ts is also presented in Appendix Table 2. Textual content analysis was conducted by three researchers, one of whom was an experienced coder. The three coders were trained at the same time, and the two junior coders encoded the 113 suicide reports of students separately. For posts with emotion feeling symbol, this study codes those posts according to the information expressed by the emotion feeling symbol. For example, a post includes negative emotional symbols such as sadness, fear, disgust, anger, we then code this post conform to item 1 of the coding scheme (Use language which sensationalizes suicide). For posts that were humorous or sarcastic, the coding results were decided by the research group after discussion. This study calculated the consistency between the two coders. Among the 14 coding items, the results of 9 coding items between the two researchers were completely consistent. We assessed intercoder reliability for the other 5 coding items. According to standards provided in the vast majority of scientific literature, coefficients >.80 are considered a high level of agreement, and ≥.70 is considered an acceptable level of agreement (Artstein & Poesio, 2008; Cohen, 1960; Hallgren, 2012). We calculated Cohen’s kappa coefficient for these 5 coding items. The researchers then discussed and revised the explanation of this coding item and then re-encoded it, if the Cohen’s kappa coefficient of a coding item was less than 0.8. And we calculated the Cohen’s kappa coefficient again. If Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.8 or more, the coding of the third experienced coder determined the final coding result. Finally, all of the Cohen’s kappa coefficients were more than 0.80, and the third researcher determined the coding results of those inconsistent posts.
Text Mining for the Comments on Online Student Suicide Posts
Text clustering was used to determine the topics of the comments of online students’ suicide posts. Sentiment analysis for the comments of online student suicide reports was conducted by the sentiment dictionary method. The detailed information, process, and effect evaluation of text clustering and sentiment analysis algorithm could be seen in Supplementary Materials.
Data Analysis
First, this study conducted content analysis to understand compliance with the guidelines for responsible reporting on suicide after the corpus data were collected and preprocessed. Second, this study used GooSeeker to conduct sentiment analysis for the 17,262 comments under 113 student suicide reports. We applied clustering analysis to mine public opinions of student suicide-related reports. Considering netizens expressed their comments under those posts of student suicide reporting, we used 2-level hierarchical generalized linear model (Bernoulli model) was used to analyze the relationships between the characteristics of student suicide posts and readers’ emotions (0 = positive sentiment, 1 = negative sentiment). In hierarchical generalized linear models, fixed effects are parameter estimates that do not vary across groups. Alternatively, random coefficients are parameter estimates that are allowed to vary across groups such as the level-1 regression coefficients. We first conducted random coefficient regression model to investigate whether there is significant variance in the intercepts across groups. According to the results, there was significant variance in the intercept term and the value of ICC1 was 0.219 (more than 0.12) (Chiang, 2023), which indicated that the effect of independent variables (characteristics of student suicide posts) on dependent variables (readers’ emotions) was different across post. We then conducted the intercepts-as-outcomes models with residuals open estimation to assess whether this variance is significantly related to the characteristics of student suicide posts. Seven characteristics (use language that normalizes suicide; use language that presents suicide as a constructive solution to problems; Titles are exaggerated or have a tendency to lead negatively; provide contact details of the bereaved, relatives or friends; report stories of how to get help; provide accurate information about where to seek help; and educate the public about the facts of suicide and suicide prevention) of student suicide posts were excluded from the regression analysis because their frequencies were less than 5%. About 7 item characteristics were included in the 2-level binary logistic regression model as 7 independent variables. We conducted three type of intercepts-as-outcomes models. First, we tested univariable associations between each characteristic of student suicide posts and netizens’ emotional orientation. Second, we adjusted for other characteristics in a model to test independent associations. Finally, we conducted the two-level logistic regression analysis after controlling the education level of student who have suicide behaviour, and the numbers of forwarding, likes, and comments.
Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation) and SAS software 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc) for statistical analyses, and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) 7.0 (Copyright ©2011 By Scientific Software International, Inc All rights reserved.) for the statistical analyses.
Results
Adherence to WHO Media Guidelines on Suicide Reporting Among 113 Student Suicide Posts
Adherence to WHO Recommended Guidelines Among Student Suicide Posts in Sina Weibo From 2015 to 2022 (n = 113).
Our findings also found that few online student suicide report posts provided useful information. Only five of the 113 posts (4.42%) provided stories about how to get help, but none provided accurate information about help, information that is critical for vulnerable people seeking it. Only four posts (3.54%) provided the public with knowledge of suicide prevention.
A minority of posts breached the media guidelines in relation to sensationalized language (12.39%) and used exaggerated or negatively guided titles (3.96%). Nearly 46.02% of posts did not specify an alleged cause of the suicide, and 74.34% did not interview bereaved family or friends. However, none of the online suicide reports about students used language that normalized suicide or provide contact details of the bereaved, relatives or friends. None of those reports presented suicide as a constructive solution to problems.
Text Clustering for the Comments of Online Student Suicide Posts
Microblog Comment Clustering Themes and Representative Comments.
In terms of the discussion of the event itself, some netizens focused on the truth of the event. They analyzed, discussed and guessed the reasons related to the suicide reported in the media. There were also some comments about where the responsibility belonged. Most of the comments were emotional and irrational. Netizens blamed the bereaved, suicide-related schools, teachers, and parents. In addition, some comments were about the long-term impact of the media reporting on suicide. The comments included public worries about the future, such as being afraid to send children to school, how to protect themselves, and avoiding student suicidal behaviors. However, most of the comments were also negative and more about the negative impact and consequences.
There were two clusters in the extended discussions. One cluster was the evaluation of the strategies of the relevant organization or departments. Some of the comments were mild and rational, urging people to trust the government and wait for responses. However, some of the aggressive comments criticized the department’s treatment measures, arguing that it had failed in its duty. The other cluster was thinking about the educational significance; most of the comments indicated that the current education style did not prepare students to cope with life challenges. Some comments also discussed education styles.
The Evaluation of Sentiment Analysis Algorithm
The total accuracy of the sentiment analysis algorithm was 0.906. the precise rate of positive emotion was 0.727, and the recall rate was 0.955. The precise rate of negative emotion was 0.884, and the recall rate was 0.890, which was more consistent with the manual recognition.
Relationship Between Characteristics of Student Suicide Posts and Comment Emotions
Relationship Between Characteristics of Student Suicide Posts (n1 = 113) and the Emotions Among Public Opinion (n2 = 176,262).
Note. CI: Confidence Interval. This study only included the items with a coverage rate of more than 5%. Model 1 represents the associations between each of those seven characteristics of student suicide posts and the emotions among public opinion. Model 2 represents the independent effect of each characteristic of student suicide posts on public emotions after adjusting for confounding by the other six characteristics.
Discussion
This study focused on the compliance of media reporting guidelines for suicide reporting updated by the WHO in 2017 and explored public opinion and appropriate strategies to reduce netizens’ negative sentiments from the perspective of enhancing responsible suicide reporting.
Student Suicide Reports are Not Consistent With all of the Media Reporting Guidelines
Previous studies found that there were common harmful reporting practices in reports containing suicide-related words in the headline and disclosing images of the bereaved, and there has been limited information about support programs in suicide reporting on social media (Chun et al., 2018; Lai et al., 2021; Pitman & Stevenson, 2015). In terms of student suicide reports, this study found that none of the posts under investigation in the current study were consistent with the WHO reporting guidelines. There is insufficient knowledge of suicide prevention provided in reporting, which is consistent with previous findings (Chu et al., 2018). Only 5 of the 113 media reports on student suicide provided information about suicide prevention and how to seek help. Our results were similar to previous findings about the quality of media reporting of suicide in some countries (Chu et al., 2018; Menon et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2022). In these reports, suicide prevention knowledge takes up very little space and largely fails to capture the reader’s attention. Information on sources of support is even omitted entirely in some media (Arafat et al., 2019; Pitman & Stevenson, 2015). High-intensity preventive reporting had a protective effect on reducing copycat suicide behaviors among students (Cheng et al., 2018). This study recommended that the media conduct more preventive reporting.
This study found that some online reports of student suicide provide detailed information, such as the detailed site/location, suicide method, and even identity of the student who died by suicide. The Internet and social media might have particularly important roles in spreading suicidal behaviour. Detailed descriptions of suicide can increase the risk of a vulnerable individual imitating the act (Knipe et al., 2022; Mars et al., 2015). The detailed site/location may make the people living in this area find something in common with the bereaved and increase their attention and exposure to media reporting student suicide events for longer periods. Some reports even have detailed photographs of the location where the bereaved committed suicide and bodies of suicide victims, which could have a substantial impact on readers. Media reporting about the detailed site or location could even have subsequent potential impact on individuals’ behaviors, such as suicidal ideation, self-harm, and copycat suicide behavior risk. Self-harm refers to any type of self-injurious behaviour, including suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury. One study found that the Internet could be directly associated with individuals’ self-harm thoughts and behaviours (Kirtley et al., 2021). The associations between social media use and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors have been verified in previous studies (Nesi et al., 2021; Tørmoen et al., 2023). In addition, those individuals with history of self-harm are more likely to search information related to suicide and to view media reports about self-harm and suicide (Mars et al., 2015). This vicious circle highlights the need for social media to be more cautious in reporting suicide events and avoid providing detailed descriptions of the site or location of suicides.
Including details on the suicide method may have a large impact on the number of suicides in the general population if they have high suicidal ideation or suicidal thoughts (Niederkrotenthaler et al., 2020). Some media reports of student suicides directly described the student’s identity and even the school’s name of the bereaved. A history of suicide among friends and acquaintances was significantly associated with an increased risk of suicidal behavior (Liu et al., 2019). Not adhering to the recommendations for suicide reports might affect readers’ suicide-related perceptions, information searches and psychology (Kim et al., 2015), and are likely to influence the population’s suicidal attempts and completed suicides (Chu et al., 2018). Responsible media reporting of suicide is important to prevent the Werther effect. This study recommended improving responsible reporting on student suicide, especially providing more prevention information, avoiding providing details about the site/location and methods, and avoiding using suicide-related photographs.
Guiding Public Opinion About Media Reporting of Student Suicidal Behaviors
Media portrayals of suicide are an important factor in shaping how the public understands the issue of suicide and reducing its stigma (O’Brien, 2021). Detailed and exaggerated media portrayals of suicide contribute to public discussion of the event. Some scholars found that comments about online media suicide reports were about family relations, blame for the people who died by suicide, suicide locations and methods, prevention, and media reporting styles. The comments on student suicide reports focused on the event itself and extended discussions about the event, such as the treatment measures taken by relevant departments and the educational significance. The public may discuss causes of suicide, blame people who are related to a suicide victim, and even be concerned about the further influence of these student suicide behaviors. Schools, teachers and parents are the focus of discussion in all student suicides. The public’s words of blame, abuse, and accountability may cause serious psychological harm to these groups. Insufficient public awareness and understanding of suicide issues, negative attitudes and prejudices, and labeling those people who died by suicide as selfish and weak have exacerbated the stigma and discrimination against suicides. Because of the stigma and taboo around mental illness and suicide, people with suicidal ideation are underrecognized and undertreated. Stigmatization also affects survivors of suicide (Witte et al., 2010). The grief of the survivors of suicide is not recognized by society, resulting in a lack of social support for the survivors of suicide, resulting in more guilt and self-blame, which can easily deteriorate into negative emotional reactions such as depression and suicidal ideation (Hanschmidt et al., 2016). A greater focus on prevention in media reporting could reduce public stigma and suicide copycat behavior (Sorensen et al., 2021). This study suggests that health educators disseminate correct suicide prevention information and carry out relevant life education and training to reduce stigma around suicide, thereby improving the effectiveness of suicide prevention efforts.
Government Responding to the Concerns of Netizens in a Timely Manner to Enhance Its Credibility
With respect to some media reporting on student suicide related to social issues, the objects of netizens’ discussions include the government, society, and even the country. If government information is not disclosed proactively and in a timely manner, it is easy for the public to cause misunderstandings or doubts. Evolving public opinion and risk have a negative impact on the government’s image and credibility. The Chinese government should be aware of the severity of negative public opinion on suicide reporting among students and take action to respond to the concerns of netizens.
Reducing the associations of student suicide reporting with potentially harmful characteristics on public negative emotions
Social media can be a platform on which netizens experience their emotions, feelings and thoughts. Celebrity suicide news reports can evoke the expression of negative emotions (Niederkrotenthaler et al., 2019; Rosen et al., 2020). This study found that most of the comments toward student suicide news were negative, and not adhering to media guidelines on student suicide reporting may have a negative effect on public sentiment. The psychological impact of suicide reports on readers may affect public mental health (Fahey et al., 2018). The suicide attempters may be more impulsive when they experience negative emotional states (You et al., 2020). There is an ongoing relationship in which suicide causes a negative mood, which in turn causes emotions of irrationality and agitation, leading to negative emotional contagion in the network. Thus, appropriate strategies need to be implemented to reduce the negative content in public opinion.
Language can play a large role in reflecting and shaping assumptions (Whorf, 2012), and it is a key tool in health care (Richards, 2019). Inappropriate language may strike a chord in netizens who are in situations similar to that reported. This study indicated that avoiding describing suicide method and using suicide-related headlines, and omitting specifying the causes of suicide are beneficial for reducing the likelihood of negative comments. More detailed information about student suicide reports and suicide-related headlines can attract the reader’s attention more by emphasizing and giving the essence of the story. This study highlights the importance of adhering to language recommendations for suicide reporting, and media professionals should be careful when writing headlines about suicides.
Limitations
First, this study analyzed the content of reports and comments on only the Sina Weibo platform, and only included 113 suicide reports in the content analysis. The Netizens also may discuss student suicide on other social media channels in China, such as WeChat, TikTok, BiliBili, and Little Red Book (Chinese equivalent of Instagram). As Weibo is one of China’s largest social media platforms, this study discussed Sina Weibo to make theoretical contributions to improving responsible student suicide reporting and reducing the negative impact of suicide reporting on public opinion. The 113 suicide reports include in the content analysis generated wide public attention and discussion. These posts may affect public sentiment infection or spread. This study analysed whether these posts are consistent with to the reporting guidelines, as well as analyzed the relationship between the adherence to the guidelines and commenter’s emotions. It would be of great significance in creating a preventive media environment for student suicide reporting. Certainly, future studies need to further expand the representativeness of samples. Adherence to student suicide reporting guidelines on other social media platforms and readers’ comments also need to be investigated. Second, this study analyzed public opinion toward student suicide reports based on cluster analysis and sentiment analysis. We did not investigate readers regarding the impact of student suicide media reports. Moreover, future studies should investigate the mechanism by which netizens’ opinions or emotions arise or spread to reduce the negative impact of student suicide media reports on public mental health. Finally, the sentiment analysis data of netizens’ comments in this study were mainly based on text content, and emoji- and image-based postings were excluded, which may have caused bias. Further analysis of video and picture content is needed in the future to obtain more convincing conclusions.
Theoretical Implications
Our findings add evidence that media reports of suicide impact public sentiment about student suicide events in China. This study has theoretical implications for leading netizens to be actively involved in the narrative of student suicide. When more details are provided in media covering suicide events (such as describing the method used; using suicide-related headlines; and reporting the causes of suicide), people have greater perceptions of the relevance of the suicide to themselves, thus stimulating negative public sentiment.
Practical Implications
This study also has practical implications for media professionals, social media platforms, society and netizens. We suggest that media workers be more rational and kinder when reporting student suicide behaviors. While maintaining the authenticity of their reports and adhering to the reporting guidelines, media professionals should pay more attention to the mental health of netizens. They should think about whether their reports will cause secondary harm to people who are related to the suicide victim and others and control the associations of the language used and manner of reporting on public mental health, including the stigma and prejudice around suicide.
Social media platforms should strengthen their control and management of the online environment by proposing and revising their suicide reporting guidelines. Given the distinctive characteristics of the student population, it is crucial for social media to approach reporting on student suicides with caution, considering the potential negative emotional impact on the public. Platforms should also exploit their strengths and take responsibility in promoting audience involvement in student suicide behavior, such as publishing suicide prevention public service announcements (Harris & Krishnan, 2023). They should monitor and identify public emotional orientations to suicide news early, especially for posts providing suicide details, using suicide-related headlines, or presenting the causes of suicide. Currently, China lacks national policies and guidelines for suicide intervention. We aspire for this study to contribute towards the formulation of suicide intervention laws and regulations, especially concerning media reporting guidelines.
Preventive efforts should target Weibo bloggers who irresponsibly report on student suicide and foster a good and positive cyber environment. The government should strengthen its public opinion response ability and awareness of public opinion risk prevention and control. We recommend that the government closely monitor and collect emerging public opinion and take the initiative to set agendas to beat the instant dissemination of irresponsible media reporting of student suicide on social media.
This study highlighted that netizens must remain rational and avoid being emotional when involved in narratives about student suicidal behavior. Authorities and social media platforms can adopt a combined approach of guidance and governance to get netizens to remain rational in such events. Firstly, social media platforms should publish responsible reports to prevent secondary emotional harm to the public. Secondly, after the student suicide events, positive guidance can be provided to encourage the public to enhance their self-judgment abilities and urge them not to post extremely emotional information, especially the influential users. Finally, social media platforms can also consider establishing monitoring and warning mechanisms. When there is extremely negative information, governance measures should be initiated, such as counseling for posters and commenters and post deletion. Moreover, it is critical to take actions to prevent the spread of this negative message. Those measures included the use of moderation strategies that remove inappropriate content (Boberg et al., 2018), requiring users to sign in to prevent anonymous commenting (Santana, 2019), and implementing interventions such as emotional tagging to promote implicit emotion regulation in online news comments, thereby encouraging people to be rational and reducing the further dissemination of negative information (Syrjämäki et al., 2022). The Internet provides a good platform for individual expression, but there are potential negative effects of free speech. Improving the ability to technically control the Internet can limit online communication to a certain extent, but it violates the right of citizens to freedom of speech. Therefore, solving the problem of online public expressions could focus on reacting and providing guidance. After the occurrence of suicide incidents, health education workers and social media managers should monitor public opinion in real time and guide citizens to publish suicide prevention information to reduce the associations between media reporting of suicide with potentially harmful characteristics on public emotion.
Conclusion
This study crawled social media information on online reporting of student suicide from 2015 to 2022 on Sina Weibo. We explored whether these reports reflected the WHO recommendations and discussed public opinion. Few online student suicide reports applying these WHO recommendations well. Moreover, student suicide news reports use emotional words. Qualified suicide reports can play a positive role in public mental health. This study found that using describing suicide methods was the independent risk factor associated with commenters’ negative emotions, and not specifying the causes of suicide was the independent protective factor after adjusting all of the confounders. These guidelines for responsible reporting should be more widely implemented and promoted, especially when reporting on the deaths of students by suicide. The government and social media should work together to improve media reporting of suicide and positively lead audience involvement to reduce the associations between the narrative of media reporting of suicide with potentially harmful characteristics on public negative emotion.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material - Improving responsible Media Reporting on Student Suicide to Reduce Negative Public Opinion: Text Mining Based on Sina Weibo in China
Supplemental Material for Improving responsible Media Reporting on Student Suicide to Reduce Negative Public Opinion: Text Mining Based on Sina Weibo in China by Meijie Chu, Chun-Yang Lee, Shiling Huang, Xiaoke Zhang, Lijie Wang, Tianmu Chen, and Yi-Chen Chiang in OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying.
Footnotes
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Yi-Chen Chiang, Meijie Chu, and Chun-Yang Lee; Methodology: Xiaoke Zhang, Meijie Chu, and Shiling Huang; Formal analysis and investigation: Xiaoke Zhang, Meijie Chu, and Shiling Huang; Writing - original draft preparation: Meijie Chu, Shiling Huang, and Lijie Wang; Writing - review and editing: Meijie Chu, and Shiling Huang; Funding acquisition: Yi-Chen Chiang; Supervision: Yi-Chen Chiang, Chun-Yang Lee and Tianmu Chen.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Scientific Research Grant of Fujian Province of China (grant no. Z0230104), and JingZe Bio Cohort Study Center, School of Public Health, Xiamen University.
Ethical Statement
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Y-C C], upon reasonable request.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Author Biographies
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
