The study analyzes and explains on-farm diversification in Emilia-Romagna, a productive and agriculturally intensified region in Italy. The purpose was to contribute to knowledge gaps on the adoption of different diversification strategies in relation to farming system. Based on farm-level census data gathered by the Italian National Institute of Statistics during the sixth general agricultural census, two on-farm diversification pathways were investigated: deepening and broadening. The farmer’s decision to diversify activities and the identification of diversification pathways were analyzed using logit and multinomial logit models. The results show that arable farms adopt broadening strategies, intensive farms opt for deepening ones, and specialized adopters of quality schemes combine both strategies. Furthermore, in contrast to the existing research, the study highlights that intensive farms are more likely than arable farms to diversify. Finally, the findings provide insights to improve analyses in the context of policy and regional strategic support.
AgugliaLHenkeRSalvioniC (2009) Agricoltura Multifunzionale. Comportamenti E Strategie Imprenditoriali Alla Ricerca Della Diversificazione. Italy: INEA. (English version forthcoming).
2.
BarbieriCMahoneyE (2009) Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers. Journal of Rural Studies25(1):58–66.
3.
BartoliniFAndreoliMBrunoriG (2014) Explaining determinants of the on-farm diversification: empirical evidence from Tuscany region. Bio-Based and Applied Economics3(2):137–157.
4.
BenjaminC (1994) The growing importance of diversification activities for French farm households. Journal of Rural Studies10(4):331–342.
5.
BoncinelliFBartoliniFCasiniL. (2016) On farm non-agricultural activities: geographical determinants of diversification and intensification strategy. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences10(1):17–29.
6.
ChaplinHDavidovaSGortonM (2004) Agricultural adjustment and the diversification of farm households and corporate farms in Central Europe. Journal of Rural Studies20(1):61–77.
7.
DriesLPascucciSGardebroekC (2012) Diversification in Italian farm systems: are farmers using interlinked strategies?New Medit11(4):7–15.
European Commission (2008) Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1242/2008 of 8 December 2008 establishing a community typology for agricultural holdings. Official Journal of the European Union L335:3–24.
10.
Eurostat (2013) Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Statistics. Luxemburg: European Union.
11.
FinocchioREspostiR (2008) Determinants of Farm Diversification and Interaction With the CAP. An Application to FADN of Marche region (Italy). In: XII EAAE Conference on People, Food and Environments: Global Trends and European Strategies, Ghent, Belgium, 26–29 August 2008.
12.
García-AriasAIVázquez-GonzálezISineiro-GarcíaF. (2015) Farm diversification strategies in northwestern Spain: factors affecting transitional pathways. Land Use Policy49:413–425.
13.
HenkeRPovellatoA (2012) La diversificazione nelle aziende agricole italiane. Agriregionieuropa8(31):1–7.
14.
HuynhTHFrankeCPiorrA. (2014) Target groups of rural development policies: development of a survey-based farm typology for analysing self-perception statements of farmers. Outlook on Agriculture43:75–83.
15.
IlberyBW (1991) Farm diversification as an adjustment strategy on the urban fringe of the West Midlands. Journal of Rural Studies7(3):207–218.
16.
INEA (2014) Italian Agriculture in Figures. Rome: INEA.
17.
LangeAPiorrASiebertR. (2013) Spatial differentiation of farm diversification: how rural attractiveness and vicinity to cities determine farm households’ response to the CAP. Land Use Policy31:136–144.
18.
McFaddenD (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: ZarembkaP (ed), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 139–145.
19.
McNallyS (2001) Farm diversification in England and Wales—what can we learn from the farm business survey. Journal of Rural Studies17(2):247–257.
20.
McNamaraKTWeissCR (2005) Farm household income and on- and off-farm diversification. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics37:37–48.
21.
MeertHVan HuylenbroeckGVernimmenT. (2005) Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farms. Journal of Rural Studies21:81–97.
22.
MeranerMHeijmanWKuhlmanT. (2015) Determinants of farm diversification in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy42:767–780.
23.
MishraAKGoodwinBK (1997) Farm income variability and the supply of off-farm labor. American Journal of Agricultural Economics79(3):880–887.
24.
MishraAKEricksonKWHarrisJM. (2010) Determinants of farm household income diversification in the United States: evidence from farm-level data. In: 2010 Annual Meeting of Agricultural and Applied Economic Association meeting, Denver, USA, 15–16 April 2010.
25.
PöllingBMergenthalerM (2017) The location matters: determinants for “deepening” and “broadening” diversification strategies in Ruhr Metropolis’ Urban Farming. Sustainability9(7):1168.
26.
PopeRDPrescottR (1980) Diversification in relation to farm size and other socioeconomic characteristics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics62(3):554–559.
27.
RentingHRossingWAHGrootJCJ. (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management90(Suppl 2):S112–S123.
28.
SalvioniCFontanellaL (2013) Diversification strategies and their impact on farm performance. APSTRACT (Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce)7(2–3):57–61.
29.
SalvioniCAscioneEHenkeR (2013) Structural and economic dynamics in diversified Italian farms. Bio-Based and Applied Economics2(3):257–275.
30.
SeunekePLansTWiskerkeJSC (2013) Moving beyond entrepreneurial skills: key factors driving entrepreneurial learning in multifunctional agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies32:208–219.
31.
TaylorJEAdelmanI (2003) Agricultural household models: genesis, evolution, and extensions. Review of Economics of the Household1(1):33–58.
32.
Van Der PloegJDRoepD (2003) Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. In: van HuylenbroeckGDurandG (eds) Multifunctional Agriculture. A new paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. VT (USA) Aldershot (UK): Ashgate, Burlington, pp. 37–53.
33.
VikJMcElweeG (2011) Diversification and the entrepreneurial motivations of farmers in Norway. Journal of Small Business Management49(3):390–410.
34.
WeltinMZasadaIFrankeC. (2017) Analysing behavioural differences of farm households: an example of income diversification strategies based on European farm survey data. Land Use Policy62:172–184.
35.
ZasadaIPiorrA (2015) The role of local framework conditions for the adoption of Rural Development Policy: an example of diversification, tourism development and village renewal in Brandenburg, Germany. Ecological Indicators59:82–93.
36.
ZasadaIReutterMPiorrA. (2015) Between capital investments and capacity building—Development and application of a conceptual framework towards a place-based rural development policy. Land Use Policy46:178–188.
