Motor impairments such as lack of standing and/or independent ambulation are common among persons with multiple disabilities. These two studies assessed technology-aided programs for persons with those impairments. Specifically, Study I assessed a program to teach two non-ambulatory adults to hand reach a stimulation-linked object by standing up. Study II assessed a program to teach a child and a man to ambulate while holding a rail or following a corridor wall. Standing increased from below 15% to about or over 80% of the session duration in Study I. The participants of Study II managed to complete brief ambulation trials independent of guidance. These performance achievements were discussed in relation to the technology-aided programs employed in the studies and the programs’ applicability in daily contexts.
AdolphK. E.Tamis-LeMondaC. S. (2014) The costs and benefits of development: The transition from crawling to walking. Child Development Perspectives8: 187–192.
2.
ApkonS. D. (2012) Moving forward: Exercise as an intervention to improve bone health in children with disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology54: 490–491.
3.
BarlowD. H.NockM.HersenM. (2009) Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change, 3rd ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
BloemenM. A.BackxF. J.TakkenT.WittinkH.BennerJ.MollemaJ.de GrootJ. F. (2015) Factors associated with physical activity in children and adolescents with physical disability: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology57: 137–148.
5.
BorgJ.LarssonS.ÖstergrenP. O. (2011) The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom?Disability and Society26: 151–167.
6.
BorreroC. S. W.VollmerT. R.BorreroJ. C.BourretJ. C.SlomanK. N.SamahaA. L.DalleryJ. (2010) Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: Experimental applications of the matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior93: 455–469.
7.
CallahanK.HensonR.CowanA. K. (2008) Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders38: 678–692.
8.
CarraroA.GobbiE. (2014) Exercise intervention to reduce depressive symptoms in adults with intellectual disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills119: 1–5.
9.
CarterE. W.OwensL.TrainorA. A.SunY.SwedeenB. (2009) Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities114: 179–192.
10.
CataniaA. C. (2012) Learning, 5th ed. New York: Sloan.
11.
DahlinE.RydénM. (2011) Assistive technology for persons with psychiatric disabilities: Accessibility and cost-benefit. Assistive Technology Research Series29: 294–299.
12.
DamcottM.BlochlingerS.FouldsR. (2013) Effects of passive versus dynamic loading interventions on bone health in children who are nonambulatory. Pediatric Physical Therapy25: 248–255.
13.
DamianoD. L.DeJongS. L. (2009) A systematic review of the effectiveness of treadmill training and body weight support in pediatric rehabilitation. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy33: 27–44.
14.
DiehrP.HirschC. (2010) Health benefits of increased walking for sedentary, generally healthy older adults: Using longitudinal data to approximate an intervention trial. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A — Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences65A: 982–989.
15.
DillonC. M.CarrJ. E. (2007) Assessing indices of happiness and unhappiness individuals with developmental disabilities: A review. Behavioral Interventions22: 229–244.
16.
FoleyA.FerriB. A. (2012) Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs12: 192–200.
17.
GharibN. M. M.El-MaksoudG. M. A.Rezk-AllahS. S. (2011) Efficacy of gait trainer as an adjunct to traditional physical therapy on walking performance in hemiparetic cerebral palsied children: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation25: 924–934.
18.
GibsonB. E.TeachmanG.WrightV.FehlingsD.YoungN. L.McKeeverP. (2012) Children’s and parents’ beliefs regarding the value of walking: Rehabilitation implications for children with cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health and Development38: 61–69.
19.
HolburnS.NguyenD.VietzeP. M. (2004) Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions19: 25–37.
20.
Hubbard WinklerS. L.VogelB.HoenigH.Cowper RipleyD. C.WuS.FitzgeraldS. G.RekerD. M. (2010) Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by Medicare and VA. Medical Care48: 558–562.
21.
KarimiM. T. (2012) The influence of walking with an orthosis on bone mineral density by determination of the absolute values of the loads applied on the limb. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine35: 55–61.
22.
KazdinA. E. (2001) Behavior modification in applied settings, 6th ed. New York: Wadsworth.
23.
KazdinA. E. (2011) Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings, 2th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
KetelaarM.VermeerA.HartH.Van Petegem-van BeekE.HeldersP. J. M. (2001) Effects of a functional therapy program on motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy81: 1534–1545.
25.
LancioniG. E.O’ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.GreenV. A.OlivaD.CampodonicoF.BuonoS. (2013) Technology-aided programs to support exercise of adaptive head responses or leg-foot and hands responses in children with multiple disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation16: 230–236.
26.
LancioniG. E.O’ReillyM. F.SinghN. N.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.AntonucciM.BasiliG. (2008) Microswitch-based programs for persons with multiple disabilities: An overview of some recent developments. Perceptual and Motor Skills106: 355–370.
27.
LancioniG. E.SigafoosJ.O’ReillyM. F.SinghN. N. (2013) Assistive technology: Interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities, New York: Springer.
28.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O’ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.AlbertiG.BoccasiniA.BuonoS. (2013) Technology-based programs to improve walking behavior of persons with multiple disabilities: Two single-case studies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology8: 92–98.
29.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O’ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.AlbertiG.PerilliV.BuonoS. (2014) Microswitch-aided programs to support physical exercise or adequate ambulation in persons with multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities35: 2190–2198.
30.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O’ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.CampodonicoF.BuonoS. (2013) Walker devices and microswitch technology to enhance assisted indoor ambulation by persons with multiple disabilities: Three single-case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities34: 2191–2199.
31.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O’ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.CampodonicoF.LangR. (2014) Persons with multiple disabilities exercise a complex response scheme to counter incorrect head and shoulder positions via a microswitch-aided program. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability39: 363–369.
32.
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N.O’ReillyM. F.SigafoosJ.OlivaD.SmaldoneA.GroenewegJ. (2010) Promoting ambulation responses among children with multiple disabilities through walkers and microswitches with contingent stimuli. Research in Developmental Disabilities31: 811–816.
33.
LenkerJ. A.HarrisF.TaugherM.SmithR. O. (2013) Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology8: 373–380.
34.
LundbergS. (2014) The results from a two-year case study of an information and communication technology support system for family caregivers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology9: 353–358.
35.
MaloneL. A.BarfieldJ. P.BrasherJ. D. (2012) Perceived benefits and barriers to exercise among persons with physical disabilities or chronic health conditions within action or maintenance stages of exercise. Disability and Health Journal5: 254–260.
36.
MalottR. (2007) Principles of behaviour, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
37.
MechlingL. C. (2006) Comparison of the effects of three approaches on the frequency of stimulus activation, via a single switch, by students with profound intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Special Education40: 94–102.
38.
MumfordL.LamR.WrightV.ChauT. (2014) An access technology delivery protocol for children with severe and multiple disabilities: A case demonstration. Developmental Neurorehabilitation17: 232–242.
39.
NäslundR.GardelliÅ. (2013) ‘I know, I can, I will try’: Youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disability and Society28: 28–40.
40.
NewmanM.BarkerK. (2012) The effect of supported standing in adults with upper motor neurone disorders: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation26: 1059–1077.
41.
NicolsonA.MoirL.MillsteedJ. (2012) Impact of assistive technology on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology7: 345–349.
42.
PalisanoR. J.ChiarelloL. A.KingG. A.NovakI.StonerT.FissA. (2012) Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation34: 1041–1052.
43.
PigaM.TradoriI.PaniD.BarabinoG.DessìA.RaffoL.MathieuA. (2014) Telemedicine applied to kinesiotherapy for hand dysfunction in patients with systematic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis: Recovery of movement and telemonitoring technology. Journal of Rheumatology41: 1324–1333.
44.
RipatJ.WoodgateR. (2011) The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology6: 87–96.
45.
RoaneH. S.KelleyM. E. (2008) Decreasing problem behavior associated with a walking program for an individual with developmental and physical disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis41: 423–428.
46.
SchererM. J.CraddockG.MackeoghT. (2011) The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation33: 811–817.
47.
SegibaevaM. O.PogodinM. A.LavrovaI. N.BalykinM. V.AleksandrovaN. P. (2011) Effect of head-down tilt on respiratory responses and human inspiratory muscle activity. Human Physiology37: 171–177.
48.
ShihC. H.ChenL. C.ShihC. T. (2012) Assisting people with disabilities to actively improve their collaborative physical activities with Nintendo Wii Balance Boards by controlling environmental stimulation. Research in Developmental Disabilities33: 39–44.
49.
ShihC. H.ShihC. T. (2010) Assisting two children with multiple disabilities and minimal motor skills control environmental stimuli with thumb poke through a trackball. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy38: 211–219.
50.
ShihC. H.ShihC. J.ShihC. T. (2011) Assisting people with multiple disabilities by actively keeping the head in an upright position with Nintendo Wii remote controller through the control of an environmental stimulation. Research in Developmental Disabilities32: 2005–2010.
51.
SiegelS. E.CastellanN. J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
SrikanthR.CassidyG.JoinerC.TeeluckdharryS. (2011) Osteoporosis in people with intellectual disabilities: A review and a brief study of risk factors for osteoporosis in a community sample of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research55: 53–62.
53.
StewartS.MachaR.HebblethwaiteA.HamesA. (2009) Residential carers knowledge and attitudes towards physiotherapy interventions for adults with disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities37: 232–238.
54.
TamG. M.PhillipsK. J.MudfordO. C. (2011) Teaching individuals with profound multiple disabilities to access preferred stimuli with multiple microswitches. Research in Developmental Disabilities32: 2352–2361.
55.
VerdugoM. A.GómezL. E.AriasB.NavasP.SchalockR. L. (2014) Measuring quality of life in people with intellectual and multiple disabilities: Validation of the San Martín scale. Research in Developmental Disabilities35: 75–86.
56.
WallaceJ. (2011) Assistive technology funding in the United States. Neuro Rehabilitation28: 295–302.
57.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. H. (2013) Establishing a causal relationship between intervention to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education46: 195–210.
