Accuracy of Subjective Performance Appraisal is Not Modulated by the Method Used by the Learner During Motor Skill Acquisition

Abstract

The present experiment examined whether the method of subjectively appraising motor performance during skill acquisition would differentially strengthen performance appraisal capabilities and subsequent motor learning. Thirty-six participants (18 men and 18 women; M age = 20.8 years, SD = 1.0) learned to execute a serial key-pressing task at a particular overall movement time (2550 ms). Participants were randomly separated into three groups: the Generate group estimated their overall movement time then received knowledge of results of their actual movement time; the Choice group selected their perceived movement time from a list of three alternatives; the third group, the Control group, did not self-report their perceived movement time and received knowledge of results of their actual movement time on every trial. All groups practiced 90 acquisition trials and 30 no knowledge of results trials in a delayed retention test. Results from the delayed retention test showed that both methods of performance appraisal (Generate and Choice) facilitated superior motor performance and greater accuracy in assessing their actual motor performance compared with the control condition. Therefore, the processing required for accurate appraisal of performance was strengthened, independent of performance appraisal method.

Keywords

motor learning knowledge of results error-detection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agarwal

P. D.

Karpicke

J. D.

Kang

S. H. K.

Roediger

H. L.

McDermott

K. D.

(2008) Examining the testing effect with open and closed book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22: 861–876.

Black

C. B.

Wright

D. L.

Magnuson

C. E.

Brueckner

(2005) Learning to detect error in movement timing using physical and observational practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 76: 28–41.

Blandin

Proteau

(2000) On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A: 846–867.

Bruchert

Lai

Shea

C. H.

(2003) Reduced knowledge of results enhances error detection. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 74: 467–472.

Butler

Roediger

H. L.

(2007) Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19: 154–525.

Carter

M. J.

Carlsen

A. N.

Ste Marie

D. M.

(2014) Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: A replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology: Movement Science and Sport Psychology 5, 1325.

Carter

M. J.

Patterson

J. T.

(2012) Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science 31: 1459–1472.

Craik

F. I. M.

McDowd

J. M.

(1987) Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 3: 474–479.

Green

Sherwood

D. E.

(2000) The benefits of random variable practice for accuracy and temporal error detection in a rapid aiming task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71: 398–402.

10.

Guadagnoli

M. A.

Kohl

R. R.

(2001) Knowledge of results for motor learning: Relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. Journal of Motor Behavior 33: 217–224.

11.

Guadagnoli

M. A.

Lee

T. D.

(2004) Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 33: 217–224.

12.

Hadwin

A. F.

Webster

E. A.

(2013) Calibration in goal setting: Examining the nature of judgements of confidence. Learning and Instruction 24: 37–47.

13.

Hasher

Zacks

R. T.

(1979) Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108: 356–388.

14.

Hogan

J. C.

Yanowitz

B. A.

(1978) The role of verbal estimates of movement error in ballistic skill acquisition. Journal of Motor Behaviour 10: 133–138.

15.

Kantak

S. S.

Winstein

C. J.

(2012) Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioral Brain Research 228: 219–231. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028.

16.

Lee

T. D.

Swinnen

S. P.

Serrien

D. J.

(1994) Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46: 328–344.

17.

Lewthwaite

Wulf

(2010) Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63: 738–749.

18.

Liu

Wrisberg

C. A.

(1997) The effects of knowledge results delay and the subjective estimation of movement form on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 68: 145–151.

19.

Makoshi

Kroliczak

van Donkelaar

(2011) Human supplementary motor area contribution to predictive motor planning. Journal of Motor Behavior 43: 303–309.

20.

Mayr

Erdfelder

Buchner

Faul

(2007) A short tutorial of G power. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 3: 51–59.

21.

Newell

K. M.

(1974) Knowledge of results and motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 6: 235–244.

22.

Newell

K. M.

Chew

R. A.

(1974) Recall and recognition in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 6: 245–253.

23.

Salmoni

A. W.

Schmidt

R. A.

Walter

C. B.

(1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95: 355–386.

24.

Sanli

E. A.

Lee

T. D.

(2014) What roles do errors serve in motor skill learning? An examination of two theoretical predictions. Journal of Motor Behaviour 46: 329–337.

25.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82: 225–260.

26.

Schmidt

R. A.

Lee

T. D.

(2014) Motor learning and performance: From principles to application, 5th ed. Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics.

27.

Schmidt

R. A.

White

J. L.

(1972) Evidence for an error detection and correction mechanism in motor skills: A test of Adams’ closed loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior 4: 1453–2153.

28.

Sherwood

D. E.

(1996) The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error detection in a rapid aiming task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 67: 35–43.

29.

Sherwood, D.E. (2008). Generalization of error detection across motor tasks by men and women. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 557–572.

30.

Sherwood

D. E.

(2009) Spatial error detection in rapid in unimanual and bimanual aiming movements. Perceptual and Motor Skills 108: 3–14.

31.

Sherwood

D. E.

(2010) Detecting and correcting errors in rapid aiming movements. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 81: 300–309.

32.

Stock

A. K.

Wascher

Beste

(2013) Differential effects of motor efference copies and proprioceptive information on response evaluation processes. PLoS One 8(4): e62335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062335.

33.

Swinnen

S. P.

(1990) Interpolated activities during the knowledge-of-results delay and post knowledge-of-results interval: Effects on performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16: 692–705.

34.

Swinnen

S. P.

Schmidt

R. A.

Nicholson

D. E.

Shapiro

D. C.

(1990) Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16: 706–716.