Visual Aesthetic Perceptions and Preferences in Conserved Objects of Plain Silk

Abstract

Three conservation methods were executed on bonnets in plain monochrome silk, to investigate which method is perceived as the most visually aesthetic; 11 bonnets were produced, 10 given identical damages, and 9 were conserved, 3 with each method. The damage was secured onto a support fabric with laid couching, a long stitch fastened with short perpendicular stitches, or brick couching, short stitches placed like brick-work, or covered with crepeline (a semi-transparent silk). The participants were 30 Swedish textile conservators (29 women; ages 29–78 years, M = 51.9, SD = 12.9), and 30 museum visitors (20 women; ages 15–74 years, M = 41.1, SD = 18.3). The participants’ task was to rate the bonnets on a 100-point continuous preference scale, based on how visually attractive they found each bonnet. Preferences were compared between the two groups of participants and the conservation methods. The bonnets with crepeline were the most preferred, and those with laid couching were the least preferred, among both groups of participants.

Keywords

textile conservation silk costumes aesthetic preferences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (AIC). (1994). Code of ethics and guidelines for practice. Retrieved from http://www.conservation-us.org/about-us/core-documents/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice#.VlNwel4V-M8.

Appelbaum

(2007) Conservation treatment methodology, Oxford, England: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

Ashley-Smith, J. (1994). Editorial. V&A Conservation Journal, 11. Retrieved from http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/journals/conservation-journal/issue-11/editorial/.

Ashley-Smith

(2009) The basis of conservation ethics. In: Richmond

Bracker

A. L.

(eds) Conservation [Electronic resource]: Principles, dilemmas and the uncomfortable truth, 1st ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 6–24.

Brajer

(2009) The concept of authenticity expressed in the intervention of wall paintings in Denmark. In: Richmond

Bracker

A. L.

(eds) Conservation: Principles, dilemmas and uncomfortable truths, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 84–99.

European Confederation of Conservator-Restorers’ Organisations (E.C.C.O.). (2002). Professional guidelines code of ethics II, Article 5. Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.ecco-eu.org/about-e.c.c.o./professional-guidelines.html.

Flury-Lemberg

(1988) Textile conservation and research, Bern, Switzerland: Abegg Stiftung.

Gill

(2006) Tapestry as upholstery: The challenges of conserving tapestry-covered seat furniture. In: Lennard

Hayward

(eds) Tapestry conservation: Principles and practice, Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 113–122..

International Council of Museums (ICOM). (2013). ICOM code of ethics for museums. Paris, France. Retrieved from http://icom.museum/the-vision/code-of-ethics/.

10.

Jedrzejewska

(2011) Problems of ethics in the conservation of textiles (1980). In: Brooks

M. M.

Eastop

D. D.

(eds) Changing views of textile conservation, Los Angeles, CA: Getty Conservation Institute, pp. 102–110.

11.

Landi

(1992) The textile conservator’s manual, London, England: Butterworths.

12.

Lennard

Eastop

(2007) Image, object, context: Image re-integration in textile conservation. In: Brown

A. J. E.

(ed.) The postprint of the image re-integration conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Northumbria University Press, pp. 7–14.

13.

Lennard

Ewer

(2010) Treatment options: What are we conserving? In: Lennard

Ewer

(eds) Textile conservation advances in practice, Oxford, England: Elsevier, pp. 53–62.

14.

Lodewijks

Leene

(1972) Restoration and conservation. In: Leene

L. E.

(ed.) Textile conservation, London, England: Butterworths, pp. 137–152.

15.

Muñoz Viñas

(2005) Contemporary theory of conservation, Oxford, England: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

16.

Nilsson

(2005) A survey of the most common support methods used on historical costumes and a preliminary investigation of tests assessing the quality of conserved fabrics. In: Janaway

Wyeth

(eds) Scientific analysis of ancient and historic textiles: Informing preservation, display and interpretation, London, England: Archetype Publications, pp. 79–85.

17.

Nilsson

Axelsson

Ö.

(2015) Attributes of aesthetic quality used by textile conservators in evaluating conservation interventions on museum costumes. Perceptual and Motor Skills 121(1): 199–218. doi:10.2466/27.24.PMS.121c10x7.