The present study investigated object-spatial imagery and verbal cognitive styles in high school students. We analyzed the relationships between cognitive styles, object imagery ability, spatial visualization ability, verbal-logical reasoning ability, and preferred modes of processing math information. Data were collected from 348 students at six high schools in two school districts. Spatial imagery style was not correlated with object imagery style and was negatively correlated with verbal style. Object imagery style did not correlate significantly with any cognitive ability measure, whereas spatial imagery style significantly correlated with object imagery ability, spatial visualization ability, and verbal-logical reasoning ability. Lastly, spatial imagery style and verbal-logical reasoning ability significantly predicted students’ preference for efficient visual methods. The results support the cognitive style model, in which visualizers are characterized as two distinct groups who process visual-spatial information and graphic tasks in different ways.
AspinwallL.ShawK. L.PresmegN. C. (1997) Uncontrollable mental imagery: Graphical connections between a function and its derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics33: 301–317.
2.
BattistaM. T. (1990) Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education21: 47–60.
3.
BettsG. H. (1909) The distribution and functions of mental imagery, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
BlazhenkovaO. (2016) Vividness of object and spatial imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills122(2): 490–508.
5.
BlazhenkovaO.KozhevnikovM. (2009) The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology23: 638–663.
6.
BremiganE. G. (2005) An analysis of diagram modification and construction in students’ solutions to applied calculus problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education36(3): 248–277.
7.
BrownT. A. (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
8.
CampbellK. J.CollinsK. F.WatsonJ. M. (1995) Visual processing during mathematical problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics28: 177–194.
9.
CarlsonM.JacobsS.CoeE.LarsenS.HsuE. (2002) Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education33: 352–378.
10.
DeanG. M.MorrisP. E. (2003) The relationship between self-reports of imagery and spatial ability. British Journal of Psychology9: 245–273.
11.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H. (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12.
Ferrini-MundyJ. (1987) Spatial training for calculus students: Sex differences in achievement in visualization ability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education18: 126–140.
13.
Galindo, E. (1994). Visualization in the calculus class: Relationship between cognitive style, gender, and use of technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
14.
GaltonF. (1883) Inquiries into human faculty and its development, London, England: Macmillan.
15.
HaciomerogluE. S. (2016) Object-spatial visualization and verbal cognitive styles, and their relation to cognitive abilities and mathematical performance. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice16: 987–1003.
16.
HaciomerogluE. S.AspinwallA.PresmegN. C. (2010) Contrasting cases of calculus students’ understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning12(2): 152–176.
17.
HaciomerogluE. S.ChickenE. (2012) Visual thinking and gender differences in high school calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology43(3): 303–313.
18.
HaciomerogluE. S.ChickenE.DixonJ. (2013) Relationships between gender, cognitive ability, preference, and calculus performance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning15: 175–189.
19.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999) Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology91: 684–689.
20.
KozhevnikovM.HegartyM.MayerR. E. (2002) Revising the visualizer–verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction20(1): 47–77.
21.
KozhevnikovM.KosslynS. M.ShepardJ. (2005) Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition33(4): 710–726.
22.
KrutetskiiV. A. (1976) The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
LeanG.ClementsK. (1981) Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics12: 267–299.
24.
LowrieT. (2001) The influence of visual representations on mathematical problem solving and numeracy performance. In: BobisJ.PerryB.MitchelmoreM. (eds) Numeracy and beyond. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sydney, Australia: MERGA, pp. 354–361.
25.
MarksD. F. (1973) Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology64: 17–24.
26.
MayerR. E.MassaL. (2003) Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology95: 833−841.
27.
McAvinueL.RobertsonI. (2006/2007) Measuring visual imagery ability: A review. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality26(3): 191–211.
28.
Moses, B. E. (1977). The nature of spatial ability and its relationship to mathematical problem solving (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
29.
PaivioA. (1971) Imagery and verbal processes, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30.
Presmeg, N. C. (1985). The role of visually mediated processes in high school mathematics: A classroom investigation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
31.
PresmegN. C. (1986) Visualization and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics17: 297–311.
32.
PresmegN. C. (2006) Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: Emergence from psychology. In: GutierrezA.BoeroP. (eds) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp. 205–235.
33.
RichardsonA. (1977) Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery1: 109–126.
34.
RidingR. J. (2001) The nature and effects of cognitive style. In: SternbergR. J.ZhangL. (eds) Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 47–72.
35.
Samuels, J. (2010). The use of technology in calculus instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York.
36.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2001) A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In: SternbergR. J.ZhangL. F. (eds) Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1–21.
37.
Suwarsono, S. (1982). Visual imagery in the mathematical thinking of seventh grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
38.
TaubG. E.FloydR. G.KeithT. Z.McGrewK. V. (2008) Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics achievement. School Psychology Quarterly23(2): 187–198.
39.
ThomasP. R.McKayJ. B. (2010) Cognitive styles and instructional design in university learning. Learning and Individual Differences20: 197–202.
40.
ThompsonP. W. (1994) Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics26: 229–274.
41.
VannucciM.MazzoniG. (2009) Individual differences in object and spatial imagery: Personality correlates. Personality and Individual Differences46: 402–405.
