Abstract
While acute exercise enhances cognitive performance, comparative effects of different maximal-effort exercise modalities remain unclear. This randomised crossover trial examined the differential cognitive impacts of graded maximal aerobic versus supramaximal exercise in active young adults. Forty-two participants (mean age = 24 ± 2 years) completed a progressive treadmill test to volitional exhaustion and a 30-s Wingate test, separated by ≥ 24-h washout. Cognition was assessed immediately before and 5 minutes post-exercise using computerized reaction time and Stroop tasks. Significant Time × Condition interactions revealed superior improvements following supramaximal exercise for simple reaction time (F (1,41) = 5.04, p = .030, ηp2 = 0.11) and incongruent Stroop performance (F (1,41) = 5.75, p = .021, ηp2 = 0.12). Supramaximal exercise produced 12.4 % improvement in reaction time versus 7.2 % for graded aerobic, and 12.8 % improvement in incongruent Stroop versus 7.6 % for graded aerobic. Congruent trials and interference scores showed no significant differences. These findings challenge the assumed superiority of aerobic exercise and demonstrate that brief supramaximal exercise elicits greater acute cognitive benefits than prolonged graded maximal exercise in physically active young adults.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
