Subject-Controlled Performance Feedback and Learning of a Closed Motor Skill 1

Abstract

Research on knowledge of results and knowledge of performance has been directed toward identification of the optimal schedule for administering feedback. The purpose of this investigation was to assess whether a schedule based on performance feedback controlled by the learner would be a more effective means of delivering feedback than any predetermined or random schedule. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five conditions: (a) control group receiving no performance feedback, (b) 50% relative performance feedback, (c) summary performance feedback, (d) subject-controlled performance feedback, and (e) yoked control group. Data were collected during an acquisition phase (four blocks of 10 trials) and a retention phase (two blocks of 10 trials) in which subjects performed an underhand ball toss. Repeated-measures analyses indicated significant main effects for the absolute error (AE). Participants in the subject-controlled performance feedback condition performed significantly better on both retention trials than the other groups. Analysis suggests that a feedback schedule which is controlled by the learner may be a more effective means of delivering augmented feedback than other schedules which have been examined.

References

Adams

J. A.

, Goetz

E. T.

, & Marshall

P. H.

(1972) Response feedback and motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 391–397.

Baird

I. S.

, & Hughes

G. H.

(1972) Effects of frequency and specificity of information feedback on the acquisition and extinction of a positioning task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 567–572.

Bilodeau

E. A.

, & Bilodeau

I. M.

(1958) Variable frequency knowledge of results and learning of a simple skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 379–383.

Boyce

B. A.

(1987) The effects of an instructional strategy with two schedules of augmented KP feedback upon skill acquisition of a selected shooting task. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11, 47–58.

Chen

, & Singer

R. N.

(1992) Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport participation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 277–300.

Fishman

, & Tobey

(1978) Augmented feedback. In W. G. Anderson & G. T. Barrette (Eds.), What's going on in gym: descriptive studies of physical education classes. Motor Skills: Theory into Practice, Monograph 1, 51–62.

Hardy

, & Nelson

(1988) Self-regulation training in sport and work. Ergonomics, 31, 1573–1583.

Holt

(1982) How children fail. New York: De Lacorte Press.

Magill

R. A.

(1989) Motor learning: concepts and applications. Dubuque, IA: Brown.

10.

Newell

K. M.

(1976) Knowledge of results and motor learning. In Keogh

, & Hutton

R. S.

(Eds.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol. 4. Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates. Pp. 195–228.

11.

Salmoni

A. W.

, Schmidt

R. A.

, & Walter

C. B.

(1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.

12.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1982) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

13.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1988) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. (2nd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

14.

Schmidt

R. A.

, & Shapiro

D. C.

(1986) Optimizing feedback utilization in motor skill training. (Tech. Rep. Contract No. MDA903-85-K-0225) Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute.

15.

Schmidt

R. A.

, Young

D. E.

, Shapiro

D. C.

, & Swinnen

(1989) Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352–359.

16.

Schneider

, & Pressley

(1989) Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer-Verlag.

17.

Seidentop

(1991) Developing teaching skills in physical education. (3rd ed.) Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

18.

Seigler

R. S.

(1991) Children's thinking. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

19.

Watkins

(1984) Students’ perceptions of factors influencing tertiary learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 3, 33–50.

20.

Winstein

C. J.

(1987) Relative frequency of information feedback in motor performance and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of California, Los Angeles.

21.

Winstein

C. J.

, & Schmidt

R. A.

(1990) Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677–691.

22.

Young

D. E.

, & Schmidt

R. A.

(1992) Augmented kinematic feedback for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 261–273.

23.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(1989) Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In Zimmerman

B. J.

, & Schunk

D. H.

(Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement theory, research, and practice: progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 1–26.