The use of parole as an institutional control mechanism is designed to reward inmate conformity with early release and punish nonconformity with continued confinement. Although much research has examined factors affecting parole board decisions, little research has focused on the control function of the parole decision. The present study, using deterrence theory, analyzes 233 offenders at the offender board review to determine the impact of the board's decision on offender misconduct. Results show lower rates of postreview misconduct for offenders denied parole hearings compared to offenders granted parole hearings. Furthermore, deterrence was strongest for high-and medium-rate offenders who were denied parole hearings. However, misconduct also decreased for high-rate offenders who were granted parole hearings. The authors recommend that correctional administrators consider the importance of parole as a mechanism for controlling institutional behavior among incarcerated inmates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abadinsky, H. (1987). Probation and parole: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Andenaes, J. (1974). Punishment and deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Anderson, A. B., Harris, A. R., & Miller, J. (1983). Models of deterrence theory. Social Science Research, 12, 232-262.
4.
Bridges, G. S., & Stone, J. A. (1986). Effects of criminal punishment on perceived threat of punishment: Toward an understanding of specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 207-239.
5.
Cao, L., Zhao, J., & VanDine, S. (1997). Prison disciplinary tickets: A test of the deprivation and importation models. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 103-113.
6.
Carey, R. J., Garske, J. P., & Ginsberg, J. (1986). The prediction of adjustment to prison by means of an MMPI-based classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 347-365.
7.
Carroll, J. S., Weiner, R., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alibrio, J. (1982). Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law and Society Review, 17, 199-228.
8.
Champion, D. J. (1994). Measuring offender risk. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
9.
Colvin, M. (1992). The penitentiary in crisis: From accommodation to riot in New Mexico. New York: State University of New York Press.
10.
Conley, J. A., & Zimmerman, S. (1982). Decision making by a part time parole board. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 396-431.
11.
Cooper, R. P., & Werner, P. D. (1990). Predicting violence in newly admitted inmates: A lens analysis of staff decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 431-447.
12.
Craddock, A. (1996). A comparative study of male and female prison misconduct careers. The Prison Journal, 76, 60-80.
13.
Feit, M. A. (1973). Prison discipline and the inmate sense of injustice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York.
14.
Gibbs, J. P. (1989). Control: Sociology's central notion. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
15.
Green, D. E. (1989a). Measure of illegal behavior in individual level deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 253-275.
16.
Green, D. E. (1989b). Past behavior as a measure of actual future behavior: An unresolved issue in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 80, 781-804.
17.
Hawkins, G. (1969). Punishment and deterrence: The educative, moralizing, and habitutative effects. In S. E. Grupp (Ed.), Theories of punishment (pp. 163-180). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
Hoffman, P. B. (1972). Paroling policy feedback. Crime and Delinquency, 9, 117-133.
19.
Jensen, G. F., & Stitt, B. G. (1982). Words and misdeeds: Hypothetical choices versus past behavior as measures of deviance. In J. Hagan (Ed.), Deterrence reconsidered: Methodological innovations (pp. 33-55). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researchers handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Kingsnorth, R. F., Alvis, L., & Gavia, G. (1993). Specific deterrence and the DUI offender: The impact of a decade of reform. Justice Quarterly, 10, 93-111.
22.
Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27, 721-746.
23.
Kramer, S. (1990). An economic analysis of criminal attempt: Marginal deterrence and the optimal structure of sanctions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 398-417.
24.
Lindquist, C. A. (1980). Prison discipline and the female offender. Journal of Offender Counseling Services and Rehabilitation, 4, 305-318.
25.
Moffitt, T. E. (1983). The learning theory model of punishment: Implications for delinquency deterrence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 10, 131-158.
26.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1991). The preventive effects of the perceived risk of arrest: Testing an expanded conception of deterrence. Criminology, 29, 561-585.
27.
Nebraska Board of Parole. (1995). Annual report. Lincoln: Nebraska Department of Corrections.
28.
O'Leary, V., & Glaser, D. (1972). The assessment of risk in parole decision making. In D. J. West (Ed.), The future of parole (pp. 135-198). London: Duckworth.
29.
Parsonage, W., Bernat, F., & Helfgott, J. (1994). Victim impact testimony and Pennsylvania's parole decision making process: A pilot study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 6, 187-206.
30.
Proctor, J. L. (1994). Evaluating a modified version of the federal prison system's inmate classification model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 256-272.
31.
Proctor, J. L. (1999). The new parole: An analysis of parole board decision making as a function of eligibility. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22, 193-217.
32.
Schneider, A. L., & Ervin, L. (1990). Specific deterrence, rational choice and decision heuristics: Applications in juvenile justice. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 585-601.
33.
Talarico, S. M. (1988). The dilemma of parole decision making. In G. F. Cole (Ed.), Criminal justice: Law and politics (pp. 442-451). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
34.
Weisburd, D., Waring, E., & Chayet, E. (1995). Specific deterrence in a sample of offenders convicted of white collar crimes. Criminology, 33, 587-607.
35.
Yu, J. (1994). Punishment celerity and severity: Testing a specific deterrence model on drunk driving recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 355-366.
36.
Zamble, E., & Porporino, F. J. (1988). Coping, behavior, and adaptation in prison inmates. New York: Springer-Verlag.
