Amity Prison-Based Therapeutic Community: 5-Year Outcomes

Abstract

Few studies have examined outcomes of prison-based treatment programs over a 5-year observation period. The present analysis was based on a sample of 715 prisoners randomly assigned either to the Amity therapeutic community program or to a notreatment group. At 5-years postrelease, 90% of the original participants were located and 81% were interviewed. The main findings were based on a conservative intent-to-treat approach. On measures of recidivism, the Amity treatment group had significantly lower rates of reincarceration than the control group, but in multivariate analysis of time to first reincarceration, this main treatment effect disappeared and other factors (age and postrelease treatment) became significant predictors of delayed time to reincarceration. As in previous reports on this cohort, those who attended aftercare had lower levels of reincarceration, longer time to reincarceration, and higher levels of employment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anglin, M. D., Danila, B., Ryan, T., & Mantius, K. (1996). Staying in touch: A fieldwork manual of tracking and procedures for locating substance abusers for follow-up studies. Washington, DC: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, National Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center.

Anglin, M. D., Hser, Y., & Chou, C. (1993). Reliability and validity of retrospective behavioral self-report by narcotics addicts. Evaluation Review, 17(1), 91-108.

Anglin, M. D., & Perrochet, B. (1998). Drug use and crime: A historical review of research conducted by the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(9), 1871-1914.

Beck, A., Gilliard, D., Greenfield, L., Harlow, C., Hester, T., Jankowski, L., et al. (1993). Survey of state prison inmates, 1991. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999a). Correctional populations in the United States—1996 (NCJ-170013). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999b). Prisoners in 1998 (NCJ-175687). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

Chaiken, M. R. (1986). Crime rates and substance abuse among types of offenders. In B. D. Johnson & E. Wish (Eds.), Crime rates among drug-abusing offenders. Final report to the National Institute of Justice. New York: Narcotic and Drug Research, Inc.

Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. R. (1990). Drugs and predatory crime. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 203-239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chou, C., Hser, Y., & Anglin, M. D. (1996). Pattern reliability of narcotics addicts’ self-reported data: A confirmatory assessment of construct validity and consistency. Substance Use and Misuse, 31(9), 1189-1216.

10.

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.

11.

De Leon, G., Melnick, G., & Kressel, D. (1997). Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among cocaine and other drug abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23(2), 169-190.

12.

De Leon, G., Melnick, G., Thomas, G., Kressel, D., & Wexler, H. K. (2000). Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26(1), 33-46.

13.

Derogatis, L. R. (1994). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

14.

Derogatis, L. R., & Lazarus, L. (1994). SCL-90-R, Brief Symptom Inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 217-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Fagan, J. (1990). Intoxication and aggression. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Crime and justice, a review of research (Vol. 13, pp. 241-320). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

General Accounting Office (GAO). (2000). State and federal prisoners: Profiles of inmate characteristics in 1991 and 1997 (GAO/GGD-00-117). Washington, DC: Author.

17.

Graham, W. F., & Wexler, H. K. (1997). The Amity Therapeutic Community Program: Description and approach. In G. De Leon (Ed.), Community as method: Modified therapeutic communities for special populations and special settings. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

18.

Hall, E. A., Zuniga, R., Cartier, J., Anglin, M. D., Danila, B., Ryan, R., et al. (2003). Staying in touch: A fieldwork manual of tracking procedures for locating substance abusers in follow-up studies (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs.

19.

Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., Simpson, D. D. (1999). Prison-based substance abuse treatment, residential aftercare and recidivism. Addiction, 94(6), 833-842.

20.

Hirshi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.

21.

Hser, Y., Anglin, M. D., & Chou, C. (1992). Reliability of retrospective self-report by narcotics addicts. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 207-213.

22.

Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., & Butzin, C. A. (in press). Five-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug-involved offenders after release from prison. Crime and Delinquency.

23.

Johnson, B. (1993). DSTAT 1.10: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

24.

Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal, 79(3), 337-351.

25.

Lowe, L., Wexler, H. K., & Peters, J. (1998). The R. J. Donovan In-Prison and Community Sub-stance Abuse Program: Three-year return-to-custody data. Sacramento: Office of Substance Abuse Programs, California Department of Corrections.

26.

Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Saum, C. A., & Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. Prison Journal, 79(3), 294-320.

27.

McBride, D. C., & McCoy, C. B. (1993). The drugs-crime relationship: An analytic framework. Prison Journal, 73(3-4), 257-278.

28.

McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., Prendergast, M., Wexler, H., Sacks, S., & Hall, E. (in press). Is in-prison treatment enough? A cost-effectiveness analysis of prison-based treatment and aftercare services for substance-abusing offender. Law and Policy.

29.

Mullen, R., Rowland, J., Arbiter, Y., Yablonsky, L., & Fleishman, B. (2001). California’s first prison therapeutic community: A 10-Year report. Offender Substance Abuse Report, 1(2), 17-18, 26-30.

30.

Newcomb, M. D., Galaif, E. R., & Carmona, J. (2001). The drug-crime nexus in a community sample of adults. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(3), 185-193.

31.

Parker, R., & Auerhahn, K. (1998). Alcohol, drugs, and violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 291-311.

32.

Pelissier, B., Camp, S. C., Gaes, G. G., Saylor, W. G., & Rhodes, W. (2003). Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 149-160.

33.

Pelissier, B., Gaes, G. G., Camp, S. C., Wallace, S. B., O’Neil, J. A., & Saylor, W. G. (1998). TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project: Six-month interim report. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons.

34.

Pelissier, B., Rhodes, W., Saylor, W., Gaes, G., Camp, S., Vanyur, S., et al. (2000). TRIAD Drug Treatment Evaluation Project final report of three-year outcomes: Part 1. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Evaluation, Federal Bureau of Prisons.

35.

Pelissier, B., Wallace, S., O’Neil, J. A., Gaes, G. G., Camp, S., Rhodes, W., et al. (in press). Federal prison residential drug treatment reduces substance use and arrests after release. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse.

36.

Porporino, F. J., Robinson, D., Millson, B., & Weekes, J. R. (2002). An outcome evaluation of prison-based treatment programming for substance users. Substance Use & Misuse, 37(8-10), 1047-1077.

37.

Prendergast, M. L., Hall, E. A., & Wexler, H. K. (2003). Multiple measures of outcomes in assessing a prison-based drug treatment program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37(3-4), 65-94.

38.

Rhodes, W., Pelissier, B., Gaes, G., Saylor, W., Camp, S., & Wallace, S. (2001). Alternative solutions to the problem of selection bias in an analysis of federal residential drug treatment programs. Evaluation Review, 25(3), 331-369.

39.

Shover, N., & Thompson, C. Y. (1992). Age, differential expectations, and crime desistance. Criminology, 30(1), 89-104.

40.

Tonry, M., & Wilson, J. Q. (Eds.). (1990). Drugs and crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

41.

Walters, G. D. (1998). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: Psychometric properties and practical utility. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 27(3/4), 9-23.

42.

Walters, G. D., & McDonough, J. R. (1998). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form as a predictor of federal parole/probation/supervised release outcome. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 173-181.

43.

Walters, G. D., White, T. W., & Denney, D. (1991). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: Preliminary data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 406-418.

44.

Wexler, H. K., De Leon, G., Kressel, D., & Peters, J. (1999). The Amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 147-167.

45.

Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Cao, Y. (2004). Risk and prison substance abuse treatment outcomes. A replication and challenge. Prison Journal, 84(1), 106-120.

46.

Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal, 79(3), 321-336.

47.

White, H. R., & Gorman, D. M. (2000). Dynamics of the drug-crime relationship. In B. LaFrente (Ed.), Crime and justice 2000, Vol. 1: The nature of crime: Continuity and change (pp. 151-218). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U. S. Department of Justice.

48.

Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594-604.

49.

Winnett, D. L., Mullen, R., Lowe, L. L., & Missakian, E. A. (1992). Amity Righturn: A demonstration drug abuse treatment program for inmates and parolees. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment and prisons and jails (NIDA Research Monograph 118, pp. 84-98). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.