In popular media, carceral food places are often depicted as large communal mess halls, but this does not reflect the diversity of such spaces worldwide. Carceral geography, while exploring prison spaces, seldom examines foodplaces in detail. Using empirical data from 21 Dutch penal institutions, we describe how incarcerated persons experience these spaces. Some elements of carceral foodplaces are normalized, but others, such as the gap between the frequency of self-catering and the need for bricolage, are not. We recommend more collaborative construction to better understand facility repurposing and its underlying motivations.
CidJ. (2005). The penitentiary system in Spain: The use of imprisonment, living conditions and rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 7(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474505050439
de GraafK.KiltyJ. M. (2016). You are what you eat: Exploring the relationship between women, food, and incarceration. Punishment & Society, 18(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515623103
5.
EarleR.PhillipsC. (2012). Digesting men? Ethnicity, gender and food: Perspectives from a ‘prison ethnography’. Theoretical Criminology, 16(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612441121
EngstromK. V.van GinnekenE. F. J. C. (2022). Ethical prison architecture: A systematic literature review of prison design features related to wellbeing. Space and Culture, 25(3), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312221104211
GammanL.CaulfieldL. (2022). Made in prison: Understanding knowledge exchange, co-design and production of cell furniture with prisoners to reimagine prison industries for safety, well-being and sustainability. In MoranD.JewkesY.Blount-HillK. L.St. JohnV. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison design (pp. 733–767). Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor books.
11.
JongB. J. D.WillemsP. J. H.TorregrosaL. D. R. (2016). Zelfredzaamheid in Detentie: Evaluatie van de pilot: Participerende Detentie & Maatschappelijke Arbeid PI Nieuwersluis. Den Haag /Woerden, WODC / VanMontfoort.
12.
MarekE. (2022). Recipes for resistance and abolition: Crafting a culinary discourse while incarcerated. Food and Foodways, 30(1–2), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.2022.2030940
13.
MartiI. (2020). A ‘home’ or ‘a place to be, but not to live’: Arranging the prison cell. (pp. 121–142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39911-5_6
14.
McClainN. (2023). Prison, material-organizational bricolage, and precarious frameworks of normality in an era of disruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(9), 1200–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231155378
15.
Ministry of Justice and Security. (2021, July 15). Tender guidelines for the European public procurement procedure with negotiation for food provision for detainees (Reference: IUC 202106071). https://www.tenderned.nl/aankondigingen/overzicht/354911
MinkeL.SmoyerA. (2017). Prison food in Denmark: Normal responsibility or ethnocentric imaginations. In Scharff SmithP.UgelvikT. (Eds.), Scandinavian penal history, culture and prison practice: Embraced by the welfare state? (pp. 353–376). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58529-5_15
18.
MoranD. (2013). Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1068/d18811
19.
MoranD.JewkesY. (2015). Linking the carceral and the punitive state: A review of research on prison architecture, design, technology and the lived experience of carceral space / Associer les états carcéral et punitif : Vers une recherche sur l'architecture carcérale, conception et techniques d'aménagement de la prison et le vécu de l'espace carcéral. Annales de Géographie, 124(702/703), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.702.0163
20.
MoranD.TurnerJ. (2019). Turning over a new leaf: The health-enabling capacities of nature contact in prison. Social Science & Medicine, 231, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.032
21.
MoranD.TurnerJ.SchlieheA. K. (2018). Conceptualizing the carceral in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 666–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517710352
22.
NieuwbeertaP.GroeneveldE.PalmenH.VanhouheA.-S. (forthcoming 2025). De food in custody study: Eerste resultaten van een nieuw langlopend onderzoeksproject naar voeding in detentie. Sancties.
23.
PudduVanhoucheA.-S. (forthcoming 2025). Domestic and shared prison kitchens: The home-ification of prison institutions kitchenismm and collective cooking in prison institutions.
24.
ReiterK.SextonL.SumnerJ. (2018). Theoretical and empirical limits of Scandinavian exceptionalism: Isolation and normalization in Danish prisons. Punishment and Society, 20(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517737273
25.
RijtJ. I. B. V. D.GinnekenE. F. J. C. V.BooneM. M. (2023). Normalisation by default and normalisation by design: A systematic review of empirical studies on the normalisation of prison life.
26.
RobberechtsJ.BeyensK. (2020). Prisoncloud: The beating heart of the digital prison cell. In TurnerJ.KnightV. (Eds.), The prison cell: Embodied and everyday places of incarceration (pp. 283–303). Palgrave Macmillan.
SmoyerA. B. (2014). Good and healthy: Foodways and construction of identity in a women’s prison. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 53(5), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515596520
29.
SmoyerA. B.BlankenshipK. M. (2014). Dealing food: Female drug users’ narratives about food in a prison place and implications for their health. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(3), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.013
30.
SmoyerA. B.MinkeL. K. (2015). Food systems in correctional settings: A literature review and case study. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/326323
31.
SmoyerA. B.MinkeL. K. (2019). Hygge: Food and the construction of safety among incarcerated women in Denmark. Appetite, 141. https://doi.org/ARTN104319
32.
SnackenS. (2002). Normalisation en prison: Concept et défis. In De SchutterO.KaminskiD. (Eds.), L'institution du droit pénitentiaire. Enjeux de la reconnaissance dedroitsaux détenus (pp. 133–152). Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence et Bruylant, Paris-Bruxelles.
33.
TartaroC. (2006). Watered down. Partial implementation of the new generation jail philosophy. The Prison Journal, 86(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885506290851
VanhoucheA.-S. (2022). Prison food: Identity, meaning, practices, and symbolism in European prisons (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96125-1
36.
VanhoucheA.-S.SmoyerA. B.MinkeL. K. (2018). Couscous in Tilburg: Prison food narratives and the quality of prison life in a Belgian-Dutch prison. Prison Service Journal, 238, 3–9.
37.
VillmanE. (2023). Narratives of normality: Finnish prisoners envisioning their future. Punishment & Society, 25(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211007192
