Homonegative Attitudes and their Correlates Among Vietnamese College Students

Abstract

This study investigated sex differences in homonegativity and their correlates among 197 Vietnamese college students (males = 49, females = 148, M = 20.9 years, SD = 2.9) in Ho Chi Minh City. The survey included Vietnamese-language versions of four scales measuring attitudes toward homosexuality (ATHS), traditional masculinity ideology, knowledge of homosexuality, and contact experiences with homosexuals. An exploratory factor analysis indicated a 3-factor structure for the ATHS: Homonegativity, Tolerance, and Positive Images. Male respondents reported significantly higher scores on homonegativity. Traditional masculinity ideology was positively related to females’ homonegativity, but negatively correlated with tolerant attitudes of both males and females. Knowledge about homosexuality was negatively correlated with homonegativity. Media contact with homosexuals was negatively correlated with males’ homonegativity, but positively correlated with both females and males’ tolerant attitudes. Results suggest that future research develop a new scale to measure Vietnamese’s homonegativity and that media contact as well as ample and accurate knowledge about homosexuality can alter homonegativity.

Keywords

homonegativity traditional masculinity ideology knowledge about homosexuality Vietnam

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamczyk

Cheng

Y. H. A.

(2015) Explaining attitudes about homosexuality in Confucian and non-Confucian nations: Is there a ‘cultural’ influence? Social Science Research 51: 276–289.

Adela

(2010) Social perception of homosexuality in Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 5: 45–49.

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991) Multiple regression, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

Blanc

M. E.

(2005) Social construction of male homosexualities in Vietnam: Some keys to understanding discrimination and implications for HIV prevention strategy. International Social Science Journal 57(186): 661–673.

Colby

Cao

N. H.

Doussantousse

(2004) Men who have sex with men and HIV in Vietnam: A review. AIDS Education and Prevention 16(1): 45–54.

Davies

(2004) Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. Journal of Sex Research 41(3): 259–266.

Feng

Lou

Gao

Cheng

Emerson

M. R.

Zabin

L. S.

(2012) Adolescents’ and young adults’ perception of homosexuality and related factors in three Asian cities. Journal of Adolescent Health 50(3): 52–60.

Hayashi

(2002) Development of Japanese version of the Male Role Norms Inventory (JMRNI). Psychological Report of Sophia University 26: 135–144.

Herek

G. M.

(1988) Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research 25(4): 451–477.

10.

Herek

G. M.

Capitanio

J. P.

(1996) “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(4): 412–424.

11.

Komlenović

Abramović

Grabovac

Mustajbegović

Milošević

(2014) Attitudes towards and knowledge about homosexuality among medical students in Zagreb. Collegium Antropologicum 38(1): 39–45.

12.

LaMar

Kite

(1998) Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Sex Research 35(2): 189–196.

13.

Levant

R. F.

Fischer

(1998) The Male Role Norms Inventory. In: Davis

C. M.

Yarber

W. H.

Bauserman

Schreer

Davis

S. L.

(eds) Sexuality-related measures: A compendium, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 469–472.

14.

Mazur

Emmers-Sommer

(2002) The effect of movie portrayals on audience attitudes about nontraditional families and sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality 44(1): 157–178.

15.

McGorry

S. Y.

(2000) Measurement in a cross-cultural environment: survey translation issues. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 3(2): 74–81.

16.

Millsap

R. E.

Maydeu-Olivares

(2009) The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

17.

Pedhazur

E. J.

Schmelkin

L. P.

(1991) Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

18.

Schiappa

Gregg

P. B.

Hewes

D. E.

(2006) Can one TV show make a difference?: Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality 51(4): 15–37.

19.

The Body. (2002) Vietnam media call homosexuality “social evil,” Vow Crackdown. Retrieved May 31, 2014, from http://www.thebody.com/content/art22986.html.

20.

Vandello

J. A.

Bosson

J. K.

Cohen

Burnaford

Weaver

(2008) Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6): 1325–1339.

21.

Wada

(1996) Seinen no douseiai ni taisuru taido: Sei oyobi seiyakuwari douitsusei ni yoru seisa. [Adolescents’ attitudes toward male and female homosexuality: Effects of sex and gender role identity]. Japanese Psychological Research 12(1): 9–19.

22.

Wada

(2008) Douseiai ni taisuru taido no seisa: Douseiai ni tsuite no chishiki, douseiaisha to no sesshoku, oyobi jendaa taipu to no kanren. [Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexuals: Examining the relationships among knowledge about homosexuality, contact with homosexuals and type of gender]. Japanese Journal of Adolescentology 26(3): 322–334.

23.

Wells

J. W.

Franken

M. L.

(1987) University students' knowledge about and attitudes toward homosexuality. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 26(2): 81–95.

24.

Whitley

B. E.

Jr. (2001) Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles 45(11–12): 691–721.