The Taxonic Latent Structure and Taxometrics in Forensic Mental Health

Abstract

Recently, researchers in the field of forensic mental health have attempted to address the technical, empirical question of whether important clinical problems, such as psychopathy or malingering, constitute taxa (i.e., discrete conditions). In this paper, we provide a detailed elucidation of the foundational logic of the quantitative methods employed to answer this question, focusing on the taxometric procedures developed by Paul Meehl and colleagues. We attempt to demonstrate that research on taxonicity is hampered by (a) researchers’ unfamiliarity with or misunderstanding of the logic underlying latent variable technologies and (b) the fundamental incapacity of Meehlian procedures to provide a test of taxonicity. We conclude by discussing the utility of taxometric procedures to research in forensic mental health and, more broadly, in the field of applied psychological measurement.

Keywords

taxonic latent structure taxometrics dimensional structure psychopathy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Basawa

Rao

(1980) Statistical inference for stochastic processes, New York, NY: Academic Press.

Cattell

R. B.

(1952) Factor analysis: An introduction and manual for the psychologist and social scientist, Oxford, England: Harper.

Cronbach

L. J.

Meehl

P. E.

(1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 52: 281–302.

Dwyer

J. H.

(1983) Statistical models for the social and behavioral sciences, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Edens

Marcus

Lilienfeld

Poythress

(2006) Psychopathic, not psychopathic: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115(1): 131–144.

Frazier

Youngstrom

Naugle

Haggerty

Busch

(2007) The latent structure of cognitive symptom exaggeration on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 22(2): 197–211.

Freedman

D. A.

(1985) Statistics and the scientific method. In: Mason

Fienberg

(eds) Cohort analysis in social research, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

Guay, J. P., & Knight, R. A. (2003, July). Assessing the underlying structure of psychopathy factors using taxometrics. Poster presented at the Developmental and Neuroscience Perspectives on Psychopathy conference, Madison, Wisconsin.

Guay

J. P.

Ruscio

Knight

R. A.

Hare

R. D.

(2007) A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: Evidence for dimensionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 116(4): 701–716.

10.

Hare

R. D.

(1991) The psychopathy checklist—Revised manual, Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

11.

Hare

R. D.

Neumann

C. S.

(2008) Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4: 217–246.

12.

Harris

Rice

Quinsey

(1994) Psychopathy as a taxon: Evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62: 387–397.

13.

Haslam

Holland

Kuppens

(2012) Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychpathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychological Medicine 42(5): 903–920.

14.

Holland

P. W.

Thayer

D. T.

(1988) Differential item functioning and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In: Wainer

Braun

H. I.

(eds) Test validity, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 129–145.

15.

Horan

W. P.

Blanchard

J. J.

Gangestad

S. W.

Kwapil

T. R.

(2004) The psychometric detection of schizotypy: Do putative schizotypy indicators identify the same latent class? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113: 339–357.

16.

Joreskog

Sorbom

(1993) LISREL 8: User’s guide, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

17.

Lord

Novick

(1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores, London, England: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

18.

Maraun, M. (2003). [Myths and confusions: Psychometrics and the latent variable model]. Unpublished manuscript.

19.

Maraun

(2016) The object detection logic of latent variable technologies. Quality and Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-015-0303-0.

20.

Maraun, M., Halpin, P., & Gabriel, S. (2007). [On the detection of latent structures: An analytic consideration of Meehl’s MAXCOV, MAMBAC, and MAXSLOPE procedures]. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/∼maraun/assets/on-the-detection-of-latent-structures–an-analytic-consideration-of-meehl%E2%80%99s-maxcov%2c-mambac%2c-and-maxslope-procedures-pdf.

21.

Maraun

Slaney

(2005) An analysis of Meehl’s MAXCOV-HITMAX procedure for the case of continuous indicators. Multivariate Behavioral Research 40(4): 489–518.

22.

Maraun

Slaney

Gabriel

(2009) The Augustinian methodological family of psychology. New Ideas in Psychology 27: 148–162.

23.

Maraun

Slaney

Goddyn

(2003) An analysis of Meehl's MAXCOV-HITMAX procedure for the case of dichotomous items. Multivariate Behavioral Research 38(1): 81–112.

24.

Mardia

Kent

Bibby

(1980) Multivariate analysis, London, England: Academic Press.

25.

McDonald

R. P.

Mulaik

S. A.

(1979) Determinacy of common factors: A nontechnical review. Psychological Bulletin 86(2): 297–306.

26.

McGrath

R. E.

Walters

G. D.

(2012) Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure. Psychological Methods 17(2): 284–293.

27.

Meehl

P. E.

(1965) Seer over sign: The first good example. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 1: 27–32.

28.

Meehl

P. E.

(1968) Detecting latent clinical taxa, II: A simplified procedure, some additional hitmax cut locators, a single-indicator method, and miscellaneous theorems (Report No. PR-68-4), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry.

29.

Meehl

P. E.

(1972) Specific genetic etiology, psychodynamics and therapeutic nihilism. International Journal of Mental Health 1: 10–27.

30.

Meehl

P. E.

(1973) Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

31.

Meehl

P. E.

(1992) Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality 60: 117–174.

32.

Meehl

P. E.

(1995) Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American psychologist 50(4): 266–275.

33.

Meehl

P. E.

(2004) What's in a taxon? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113: 39–43.

34.

Meehl

P. E.

Golden

(1982) Taxometric methods. In: Kendall

Butcher

(eds) Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology, New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 127–181.

35.

Meehl

P. E.

Yonce

L. J.

(1994) Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports 74(3, Pt 2): 1059–1274.

36.

Meehl

P. E.

Yonce

L. J.

(1996) Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV PROCEDURE). Psychological Reports 78(3, pt 2): 1091–1227. Monograph Supplement.

37.

Miller

(1996) Limitations of Meehl’s MAXCOV-HITMAX procedure. American Psychologist 51: 554–556.

38.

Parry

Steiner

Tellefsen

Dietz

(1970) Chemistry: Experimental foundations, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

39.

Royce

J. R.

(1958) The development of factor analysis. Journal of General Psychology 58: 139–164.

40.

Rummel

R. J.

(1970) Applied factor analysis, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

41.

Ruscio

(2007) Taxometric analysis: An empirically-grounded approach to implementing the method. Criminal Justice and Behavior 24: 1588–1622.

42.

Ruscio

Kaczetow

(2009) Differentiating categories and dimensions: Evaluating the robustness of taxometric analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research 44(2): 259–280.

43.

Ruscio

Marcus

D. K.

(2007) Detecting s mall taxa using simulated comparison data: A reanalysis of Beach, Amir, and Bau’s (2005) data. Psychological Assessment 19: 241–246.

44.

Ruscio

A. M.

Keane

T. M.

(2004) Using taxometric analysis to distinguish a small latent taxon from a latent dimension with positively skewed indicators: The case of Involuntary Defeat Syndrome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113: 145–154.

45.

Skilling

T. A.

Harris

G. T.

Rice

M. E.

Quinsey

V. L.

(2002) Identifying persistently antisocial offenders using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist and the DSM antisocial personality disorder criteria. Psychological Assessment 14: 27–38.

46.

Spearman

(1904) General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology 15: 201–293.

47.

Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May 30). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society in Iowa City, USA.

48.

Strong

D. R.

Greene

R. L.

Schinka

J. A.

(2000) A taxometric analysis of MMPI-2 infrequency scales [F and F(p)] in clinical settings. Psychological Assessment 12: 166–173.

49.

Vasey

Kotov

Frick

Loney

(2005) The latent structure of psychopathy in youth: A taxometric investigation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 33(4): 411–429.

50.

Waller

N. G.

Meehl

P. E.

(1998) Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

51.

Walters

Duncan

Mitchell-Perez

(2007) The latent structure of psychopathy: A taxometric investigation of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in a heterogeneous sample of male prison inmates. Assessment 14: 270–278.

52.

Walters

G. D.

Berry

D. T. R.

Rogers

Payne

J. W.

Granacher

R. P.

(2009) Feigned neurocognitive deficit: Taxon or dimension? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 31: 584–593.

53.

Walters

G. D.

Rogers

Berry

D. T. R.

Miller

H. A.

Duncan

S. A.

McCusker

P. J.

Granacher

R. P.

(2008) Malingering as a categorical or dimensional construct: The latent structure of feigned psychopathology as measured by the SIRS and MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment 20: 238–247.