Two studies examined lying, fair sharing, and trust of Israeli police officers and laypeople to police and non-police target persons in the Ultimatum Game. Participants aimed to retain as many resources as possible in a sharing situation. To this end, they could conceal resources from the target person. Thus, a measure of lying was created by letting participants act in a specific role. Results indicated that police officers lied less to police targets than non-police targets. Conversely, laypeople lied more to police targets and less to non-police targets. Police officers' preference for honest sharing with police targets and laypeople’s selfish sharing with police targets signified the first study’s results. Results were explained by ingroup-outgroup differences, further inspired by severe events undermining the Israeli police’s reputation. One year later, similar but weaker results were obtained in a second study. Police officers trusted police targets more than non-police targets, and laypeople trusted police targets less than non-police targets.
AlpertG. P.NobleJ. J. (2009). Lies, true lies, and conscious deception police officers and the truth. Police Quarterly, 12(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611108327315
2.
BardM. (2022). The status of Arabs in Israel. Jewish Virtual Library.
3.
Ben SolomonA. (2018). How can Israel bring order from anarchy among the Negev Bedouins?Jewish News Syndicate. (June 10, 2018).
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
6.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. The American Psychologist, 62(8), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.728
7.
BudhathokiP.AdhikariK.KoiralaR. (2019). The gap between attitudes and behavior in ethical consumption: A critical discourse. Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 1(2), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.3126/qjmss.v1i2.27446
8.
de CremerD.StoutenJ. (2003). When do people find cooperation most justified? The effect of trust and self-other merging in social dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 16(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022974027023
9.
DemirkolI. C.NallaM. K. (2019). Police culture: An empirical appraisal of the phenomenon. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 20(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818823832
10.
ElaadE. (2018). Personality, demographic, and psychophysiological correlates of people's self-assessed lying abilities. In RosenfeldJ. P. (Ed.), Detecting concealed information and deception: Verbal, behavioral, and biological methods (pp. 353–376). Elsevier. Ch. 15https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812729-2.00015-X
11.
ElaadE.HananiaS. B.MazorS.ZviL. (2020). The relations between deception, narcissism, and self-assessed lie- and truth-related abilities. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(5), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1751328
12.
EverettJ. A. C.FaberN. S.CrockettM. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 15. 13 February 2015https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
13.
GarrettN.LazzaroS.ArielyD.SharotT. (2016). The brain adapts to dishonesty. Nature Neuroscience, 19(12), 1727–1732. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4426
14.
GüthW.SchmittbergerR.SchwarzeB. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. The Journal of Business, 59(S4), S285–S300. https://doi.org/10.1086/296367
17.
LoftusB. (2007). Policing the ‘irrelevant’: Class, diversity, and contemporary police culture. In O'NeillM.MarksM.SinghA. M. (Eds.), Police occupational culture: New debates and directions (pp. 181–204). Jai Press.
18.
MendozaS. A.LaneS. P.AmodioD. M. (2014). For members only: Ingroup punishment of fairness norm violations in the Ultimatum Game. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614527115
19.
OosterbeekH.SloofR.van de KuilenG. (2004). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:exec.0000026978.14316.74
ReynoldsJ. J.Estrada-ReynoldsV.NunezN. (2018). Development and validation of the attitudes towards police legitimacy scale. Law and Human Behavior, 42(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000281
22.
ShernockS. (2007). Police solidarity. In GreenJ. R. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of police science (pp. 994–1000). Routledge.
23.
SkoganW. G.FrydiK. (Eds.), (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. The National Academic Press.
TylerT. R.JacksonJ. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514
29.
YamagishiT.JinN.KiyonariT. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161–197.
